Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma misdiagnosed as heterotopic ossification after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A case report

Pages
118–123
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, careful attention and thorough evaluation with multiple imaging tests may be necessary for the differential diagnosis of these entities

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a malignant tumor of soft tissue characterized by osteoid production and has a very low prevalence, comprising approximately 4% of all osteosarcomas and about 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas, and a total of about 350 cases have been reported until now.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report a case of an 86-year-old woman with a history of total hip arthroplasty (THA), in which open reduction and internal fixation were done for periprosthetic femoral Fracture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, careful attention and thorough evaluation with multiple imaging tests may be necessary for the differential diagnosis of these entities
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a malignant tumor of soft tissue characterized by osteoid production and has a very low prevalence, comprising approximately 4% of all osteosarcomas and about 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas, and a total of about 350 cases have been reported until now. Heterotopic ossification is a pathological finding of bony tissue in soft tissue regions such as muscle, skin and subcutaneous tissue. We report a case of an 86-year-old woman with a history of total hip arthroplasty (THA), in which open reduction and internal fixation were done for periprosthetic femoral Fracture. The ossified lesion misdiagnosed as heterotopic ossification initially was diagnosed as extraskeletal osteosarcoma at 6 months after the surgery. Both extraskeletal osteosarcoma and heterotopic ossification have no definite symptoms, but show radiopaque shadows on simple radiograph. Therefore, careful attention and thorough evaluation with multiple imaging tests may be necessary for the differential diagnosis of these entities

🔖

Cite This Article

SUNG, I., SON, H., PARK, J., SONG, Y., PARK, K. (2020). Extraskeletal osteosarcoma misdiagnosed as heterotopic ossification after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A case report. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 118–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/142826

References (3)

  1. Goldstein-Jackson SY, Gosheger G, Delling G, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma has a favourable prognosis when treated like conventional osteosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005; 131: 520-6. [CrossRef] Ahmad SA, Patel SR, Ballo MT, et al. Extraosseous osteosarcoma: Response to treatment and long-term outcome. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 521-7. [CrossRef] Lee S, Lee MR, Lee SJ, et al. Extraosseous osteosarcoma: Single institutional experience in Korea. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2010; 6: 126-9. [CrossRef] Lidang Jensen M, Schumacher B, Myhre Jensen O, Steen Nielsen O, Keller J. Extraskeletal osteosarcomas: A clinicopathologic study of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 588-94. [CrossRef] McCarthy EF, Sundaram M. Heterotopic ossification: A review. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34: 609-19. [CrossRef] Shehab D, Elgazzar AH, Collier BD. Heterotopic ossification. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:346-353.
  2. Neal B, Gray H, MacMahon S, Dunn L. Incidence of heterotopic bone formation after major hip surgery. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72: 80821. [CrossRef] Nystrom LM, Reimer NB, Reith JD, Scarborough MT, Gibbs CP Jr. T he treatment and outcomes of extraskeletal osteosarcoma: institutional experience and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 2016; 36: 98-103.
  3. Bane BL, Evans HL, Ro JY, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma. A clinicopathologic review of 26 cases. Cancer 1990; 65: 2762-70. 10. Choi LE, Healey JH, Kuk D, Brennan MF. Analysis of outcomes in extraskeletal osteosarcoma: A review of fifty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: e2. [CrossRef] 11. Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The etiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res 2009; 152: 15-32. [CrossRef] 12. Visuri T, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P. Malignant tumors at the site of total hip prosthesis. Analytic review of 46 cases. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 311-23. [CrossRef] 13. Kirkpatrick CJ, Alves A, Kohler H, et al. Biomaterial-induced sarcoma: A novel model to study preneoplastic change. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 1455-67. [CrossRef] 14. Kavalar R, Fokter SK, Lamovec J. Total hip arthroplasty-related osteogenic osteosarcoma: Case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2016; 21: 8. [CrossRef] 15. Lohmann CH, Singh G, Willert HG, Buchhorn GH. Metallic debris from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty regulates periprosthetic tissues. World J Orthop 2014; 5: 660-6. [CrossRef] 16. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoc’h M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or