Journals / Central Bank Review / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

On income and wealth inequality in Turkey

Pages
95–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we quantify the welfare cost of inequality, and report that in order not to switch to the unequal Turkish economy, a utilitarian benevolent planner of Turkey's counter-factual representative-agent economy would be indifferent to forgoing 25.15% of steady-state consumption along with working an extra 33.61% of steady-state hours indefinitely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we study Turkey's income and wealth distribution using a model-based approach via a modified Aiyagari (1994) model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In doing so, we use recent parameter estimates for Turkey and calibrate our model to match Turkey's income and wealth inequality measures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we quantify the welfare cost of inequality, and report that in order not to switch to the unequal Turkish economy, a utilitarian benevolent planner of Turkey's counter-factual representative-agent economy would be indifferent to forgoing 25.15% of steady-state consumption along with working an extra 33.61% of steady-state hours indefinitely.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, we study Turkey's income and wealth distribution using a model-based approach via a modified Aiyagari (1994) model. In doing so, we use recent parameter estimates for Turkey and calibrate our model to match Turkey's income and wealth inequality measures. We document that our calibrated model matches Turkey's empirical economic inequality metrics with high precision, therefore can be used to infer Turkey's wealth distribution, which lacks data and detailed analysis. We compare Turkey's inequality measures with other countries, and display that by any conventional metric, Turkey qualifies as one of the more unequal economies. Finally, we quantify the welfare cost of inequality, and report that in order not to switch to the unequal Turkish economy, a utilitarian benevolent planner of Turkey's counter-factual representative-agent economy would be indifferent to forgoing 25.15% of steady-state consumption along with working an extra 33.61% of steady-state hours indefinitely.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUL, O., ÖZTUNALI, O. (2018). On income and wealth inequality in Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 95–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/142745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A., 2015. The rise and decline of general laws of capital-ism. J. Econ. Perspect. 29 (1), 3e28. Aiyagari, S.R., 1994. Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Q. J. Econ. 109 (3), 659e684. Aldan, A., Gaygısız, E., 2006. Convergence across provinces of Turkey: a spatial analysis. In: Working Paper No:0609, Research and Monetary Policy Depart-ment, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Alstadsæter, A., Johannesen, N., Zucman, G., 2017. Who Owns the Wealth in Tax Havens? Macro Evidence and Implications for Global Inequality. Technical Report (National Bureau of Economic Research). Altınbas¸, S., Dogruel, F., Günes¸, M., 2002. Türkiye’de Bolgesel€ Yakınsama: Kalkın- mada Oncelikli Iller Politikas Basar l M ? VI, pp. 11e14. ODTÜ Uluslararas Ekonomi Kongresi. Alvaredo, F., Assouad, L., Piketty, T., 2017. Measuring inequality in the Middle East 1990-2016: the World's most unequal region? WID.world Working Paper. Series No: 2017/15. Arrow, K.J., 1999. Discounting, morality, and gaming. In: Discounting and Inter-generational Equity, pp. 13e21. Bakıs¸, O., Polat, S., 2015. Wage inequality in Turkey, 2002e10. Econ. Transit. 23 (1), 169e212. Bas¸ levent, C., Dayıoglu, M., 2005. A household level examination of regional income disparity in Turkey. METU Studies in Development 32 (2), 275e302. Bewley, T., 1986. In: Stationary Monetary Equilibrium with a Continuum of Inde-pendently Fluctuating Consumers, vol. 79. North-Holland. Bick, A., Fuchs-Schündeln, N., Lagakos, D., 2018. How do hours worked vary with Income? Cross-Country evidence and implications. Am. Econ. Rev. 108 (1), 170e199. Brinca, P., Holter, H.A., Krusell, P., Malafry, L., 2016. Fiscal multipliers in the 21st century. J. Monetary Econ. 77, 53e69. Castaneda,~ A., Díaz-Gimenez, J., Rios-Rull, J.V., 2003. Accounting for the us earnings and wealth inequality. J. Polit. Econ. 111 (4), 818e857. Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., Weber, A., 2011. Are micro and macro labor supply elasticities Consistent? A review of evidence on the intensive and extensive margins. Am. Econ. Rev. 101 (3), 471e475. Çiçek, D., Elgin, C., 2011. Not-quite-great depressions of Turkey: a quantitative analysis of economic growth over 1968e2004. Econ. Modell. 28 (6), 2691e2700. Conesa, J.C., Kitao, S., Krueger, D., 2009. Taxing Capital? Not a bad idea after all! Am. Econ. Rev. 99 (1), 25e48. Cowell, F., Nolan, B., Olivera, J., VanKerm, P., 2016.
  2. Wealth, Top Incomes and Inequality. Credit Suisse, 2014