Journals / Central Bank Review / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Forecasting industrial production and inflation in Turkey with factor models

Pages
149–161
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Factor models perform better than the combination of bi-variate forecasts which indicates that pooling information improves over pooling individual forecasts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, industrial production growth and core inflation are forecasted using a large number of domestic and international indicators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A comprehensive analysis is carried out to understand the sensitivity of the forecast performance of factor models to various modelling choices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Factor models perform better than the combination of bi-variate forecasts which indicates that pooling information improves over pooling individual forecasts.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, industrial production growth and core inflation are forecasted using a large number of domestic and international indicators. Two methods are employed, factor models and forecast combination, to deal with the curse of dimensionality problem stemming from the availability of ever growing data sets. A comprehensive analysis is carried out to understand the sensitivity of the forecast performance of factor models to various modelling choices. In this respect, effects of factor extraction method, number of factors, data aggregation level and forecast equation type on the forecasting performance are analyzed. Moreover, the effect of using certain data blocks such as interest rates on the forecasting performance is evaluated as well. Out-of-sample forecasting exercise is conducted for two consecutive periods to assess the stability of the forecasting performance. Factor models perform better than the combination of bi-variate forecasts which indicates that pooling information improves over pooling individual forecasts.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, M. (2018). Forecasting industrial production and inflation in Turkey with factor models. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 149–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/142743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Akkoyun, H.Ç., Günay, M., 2012. Nowcasting Turkish GDP Growth. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper, (12/33). Altug, S., Uluceviz, E., 2014. Identifying leading indicators of real activity and inflation for Turkey, 1988-2010. OECD J.: J. Bus. Cycle Meas. Anal. 2014 (1), 1e37. Bai, J., 2003. Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica 71 (1), 135e171. Bai, J., Ng, S., 2002. Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica 70 (1), 191e221. Bai, J., Ng, S., 2007. Determining the number of primitive shocks in factor models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 52e60. Bai, J., Ng, S., 2008. Large dimensional factor analysis. Found. Trends Econom. 3 (2), 89e163. Barhoumi, K., Darne, O., Ferrara, L., 2010. Are disaggregate data useful for fore-casting French GDP with dynamic factor models? J. Forecast. 29 (1e2), 132e144. Barhoumi, K., Darne, O., Ferrara, L., 2013. Testing the number of factors: an empirical assessment for a forecasting purpose. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 75 (1), 64e79. Boivin, J., Ng, S., 2005. Understanding and comparing factor based macroeconomic forecasts. Int. J. Cent. Bank. 1 (3), 117e152. Boivin, J., Ng, S., 2006. Are more data always better for factor analysis? J. Econom. 132 (1), 169e194. D'Agostino, A., Giannone, D., 2012. Comparing alternative predictors based on large-panel factor models. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 74 (2), 306e326. Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., Reichlin, L., 2000. The generalized dynamic-factor model: identification and estimation. Rev. Econ. Stat. 82 (4), 540e554. Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., Reichlin, L., 2003. Do financial variables help fore-casting inflation and real activity in the euro area? J. Monetary Econ. 50 (6), 1243e1255. Forni, M., Hallin, M., Lippi, M., Reichlin, L., 2005. The Generalized dynamic factor model: one sided estimation and forecasting. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100, 830e840. Günay, M., 2015. Forecasting Turkish industrial production growth with static factor models. Int. Econom. Rev. (IER) 7 (2), 64e78. Kapetanios, G., Marcellino, M., 2009. A parametric estimation method for dynamic factor models of large dimensions. J. Time Anal. 30 (2), 208e238. Modugno, M., Soybilgen, B., Yazgan, E., 2016. Nowcasting Turkish GDP and news decomposition. Int. J. Forecast. 32 (4), 1369e1384. F., Akdogan, K., Bas¸ er, S., Chadwick, M.G., Ertug, D., Hülagü, T., Kosem,€ S., Ogünç, Ozmen, M.U., Tekatl, N., 2013. Short-term inflation forecasting models for Turkey a