Journals / Central Bank Review / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

A cross-country analysis of total factor productivity using micro-level data

Pages
13–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Total factor productivity (TFP) is a crucial measure of efŞciency and thus an important tool for policymakers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, research on comparison of TFP performances using micro-level data across developingcountries has been limited due to the unavailability of homogenous data sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Total factor productivity (TFP) is a crucial measure of efŞciency and thus an important tool for policymakers. However, research on comparison of TFP performances using micro-level data across developingcountries has been limited due to the unavailability of homogenous data sources. This study aims toŞllthis crucial gap by using a data set which has been collected through a large body of surveys conductedacross 69 developing countries following the same methodology. The homogenous nature of the dataand the diverse set of questions included in the surveys provide unique opportunity to compare averageproductivity performances ofŞrms across a large set of characteristics and business environment factors.The analysis performed here provides the groundwork for testing various stylized facts about TFP and itsrelated factors such as exporting, innovation, access toŞnance, foreign ownership, and regulations acrossdeveloping countries.© 2018 Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, M., SALİOLA, F. (2018). A cross-country analysis of total factor productivity using micro-level data. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 13–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/142742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Atesagaoglu, O.E., Elgin, C., Oztunalı, O., 2017. TFP growth in Turkey revisited: the effect of informal sector. Cebtral Bank. Rev. 17 (1), 11e17. Audretsch, D.B., 2002. The dynamic role of small firms: evidence from the U.S. Small Bus. Econ. 18 (1-3), 13e40. Baily, M.N., Hulten, C., Campbell, D., 1992. The distribution of productivity in manufacturing plants. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Microecon. 4, 187e267. Bartelsman, E.J., Dhrymes, P.J., 1998. Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants, 1972e1986. J. Prod. Anal. 9 (1), 5e34. Bartlesman, E.J., Doms, M., 2000. Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata. J. Econ. Lit. 38 (3), 569e594. Ericson, R., Pakes, A., 1995. Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econ. Stud. 62 (1), 53e82. Escribano, A., Orte, M.D., Pena, J., 2009. Econometric Analysis of Turkish Investment Climate Analysis Based on Firm Level Data of the Manufacturing Sector in 2008 and 2005.
  2. Working Paper. World Bank, USA. Eslava, M., Haltiwanger, J., Kugler, A., Kugler, M., 2004. The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitability enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia. J. Dev. Econ. 75, 333e371. Fernandes, A.M., 2008. Firm Productivity in Bangladesh Manufacturing Industries. In: Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3988. World Bank, Washington, DC. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., Krizan, C.J., 2001. Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence. In: Hulten, C.R., Dean, E.R., Harper, M.J. (Eds.), New Developments in Productivity Analysis. University of Chicago Press,
  3. Chicago. Gollin, Douglas, 2002. Getting income shares right. J. Polit. Econ. 110 (2), 458e474. Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Q. J. Econ. 114 (1), 83e116. Hall, R.E., 1990. Invariance Properties of Solows Productivity Residual. In: Diamond, Peter (Ed.), Growth, Productivity, Employment. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 1e53. Hallward-Driemeier, M., Iarossi, G., Sokoloff, K.L., 2002. Exports and Manufacturing Productivity in East Asia: a Comparative Analysis with Firm-level Data. NBER Working Paper No. 8894. Hsieh, C.-T., Klenow, P.J., 2010. Development accounting. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2, 207e223. Hopenhayn, H.A., 1992. Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica 60 (5), 1127e1150. Imrohoroglu, Ays ¸ e, Üngor, Murat, 2016. Total Factor Productivity Levels: Some € Anomalies in Pen World Tables. W