Journals / Acta Medica / 2019 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Pain Management of Multiple Rib Fractures based on Early Reduction and Fixation in Patients without Intensive Care Unit

Pages
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of our study suggest that open rib reduction and fixation can be a better treatment option than the surveillance only approach in terms of pneumonia rates, hospitalization time, thoracic deformity rates and pain management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Blunt thoracic traumas are often complicated with rib fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Cases with 3 or more rib fractures were evaluated in our study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of our study suggest that open rib reduction and fixation can be a better treatment option than the surveillance only approach in terms of pneumonia rates, hospitalization time, thoracic deformity rates and pain management.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Blunt thoracic traumas are often complicated with rib fractures. The decision-making process of the treatment approaches not clear for clinicians. So, we aim to investigate the effect of surgical intervention on pain management of patients as treatment indication. Methods: Cases with 3 or more rib fractures were evaluated in our study. Between 2014-2018, 367 patients with multiple rib fractures were admitted to our hospital. Of the 367 patients, 238 were included in this study. Among them 84 cases with multiple rib fractures that underwent surgery within fist 36 hours, 27 cases were operated after the 7th day 127 patients were managed conservatively. The results of hospitalization time, pneumonia, rates, thoracic deformity rates on 6.month thorax computerized tomography, intercostal blockage requirement, postoperative 6.month quality of life questionnaire for pain and clinical outputs were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The average hospitalization was found that it was significantly different in favor of the surgical group (z = 6.674; p <0.001). Thoracic deformity rates, intercostal blockage requirement was found to be different between the surgery and non-surgery groups (χ2=7.149;p<0.001), (χ2=22.462;p<0.001). Pain and quality of life scores had also significant difference in favor of the surgical group, respectively (z = 9.270; p <0.001) and (z = 8.796; p <0.001). Additionally, there was a statistical difference in pneumonia rates (p= 0.020). We did not reach a statistically significant result between the early and late groups in pain 1 and pain 2 results (p1: 0.727, p2: 0.069). Conclusions: There is no consensus on the treatment of rib fractures. The results of our study suggest that open rib reduction and fixation can be a better treatment option than the surveillance only approach in terms of pneumonia rates, hospitalization time, thoracic deformity rates and pain management.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞABABAOĞLU, İ., YILDIZ, Ö. Ö., ETHEMOGLU, F. B. Ç., SANİOĞLU, Y. S. (2019). Pain Management of Multiple Rib Fractures based on Early Reduction and Fixation in Patients without Intensive Care Unit. Acta Medica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/142572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Özkan S, Tetik GB, Tahtacı R, et al. Retrospective Analysis of 513 Cases Diagnosed with Rib Fracture Secondary to Blunt Thorax Trauma. J Clin Anal Med 2017;8(3):181-4
  2. Tanaka H, Yukioka T, Yamaguti Y, et al. Surgical stabilization of internal pneumatic stabilization?: a prospective randomized study of management of severe flail chest patients. J Trauma 2002;52:727-32
  3. Soderlund T, Ikonen A, Pyhalto T, et al. Factors associated with in-hospital outcomes in 594 consecutive patients suffering from severe blunt chest trauma. Scand J Surg 2015;104:115–20
  4. Witt CE, Bulger EM. Comprehensive approach to the management of the patient with multiple rib fractures: a review and introduction of a bundled rib fracture management protocol. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 2017;2:1–7
  5. Pape HC, Remmers D, Rice J, et al. Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making. J Trauma 2000;49:496–504
  6. Todd SR, McNally MM, Holcomb JB, et al. A multidisciplinary clinical pathway decreases rib fracture-associated infectious morbidity and mortality in high-risk trauma patients. Am J Surg 2006;192:806-11
  7. Elie G, Pierre EF, Nicola S, et al. Does surgical stabilization improve outcomes in patients with isolated multiple distracted and painful non-flail rib fractures? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2012;14:312–315
  8. Jaap S, J. C. Goslings, T. Schepers. Operative management versus non-operative management of rib fractures in flail chest injuries: a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017;43:163–68
  9. Martin TJ, Eltorai AS, Dunn R, et al. Clinical management of rib fractures and methods for prevention of pulmonary complications: A review. Injury 2019;50(6):1159-65
  10. Eun Gu Hwang, Yunjung Lee. Effectiveness of intercostal nerve block for management of pain in rib fracture patients. J Exerc Rehabil 2014; 10(4): 241–44
  11. Khosa AH, Durrani HD, Wajid W et al. Choice of Analgesia in Patients with Critical Skeletal Trauma. Cureus 2019;11(5): e4694
  12. Kerr VMA, Arthur M, Mullins RJ, et al. Rib fracture pain and disability: Can we do better? J Trauma 2003;54(6):1058-63
  13. Richardson JD, Miller FB, Carrillo EH, et al. Complex thoracic injuries. Surg Clin North Am 1996;76(4):725-48
  14. Mayberry JC, Kroeker AD, Ham LB, et al. Long-term morbidity, pain, and disability after repair of severe chest wall injuries. Am Surg 2009;75(5):389-94. [15