Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

How Appropriate Are the Indications for Parenteral Nutrition Patients?

Parenteral Beslenen Hastaların Endikasyonları Ne Kadar Uygun?

Pages
116–123
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that the recommendations of the hospital nutritional support team (NDE) should be taken into consideration against the risk of inappropriate indication and insufficient calorie administration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a treatment method that provides intravenous nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PN may improve clinical outcomes and may lead to an increase in mortality and morbidity due to complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that the recommendations of the hospital nutritional support team (NDE) should be taken into consideration against the risk of inappropriate indication and insufficient calorie administration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a treatment method that provides intravenous nutrition. PN may improve clinical outcomes and may lead to an increase in mortality and morbidity due to complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications of PN, to determine the incidence of inappropriate initiation of PN , and to investigate caloric adequacy. Method: All patients who started to receive PN were identified from the hospital database and visited by the nutrition nurse and dietician. Demographic data, service, diagnosis, PN compliance, indications, calorie intake and adequacy of the patients were evaluated. Each patient receiving PN was examined according to the guidelines of the European Association of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and classified as “appropriate” and “inappropriate”. In addition, patients receiving PN were divided into 4 categories as Peripheral PN, Central PN, Enteral+PN, Oral+PN. Results: In our hospital, 333 patients underwent PN for six months. PN was started due to vomiting preventing oral intake (37%), obstructive bowel disease (27%), severe diarrhea (12%) and severe malabsorption (12%). In 153 (45.9%) patients PN were started with inappropriate indication. The most frequent reasons for inappropriate indication were the preference of the doctor for conservative PN (142 cases, 92.8%). While 256 (76.9%) of the patients who started PN were receiving inadequate calorie intake. Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) (155 cases, 46.5%) was most frequently preferred in the nutrition of the patients, inappropriate indication for PN (40%) and inadequate calorie intake (98.1%) were seen in this group. Conclusion: In patients who cannot receive adequate oral or enteral nutrition for any reason, PN is initiated alone or in addition to enteral nutrition. In order to minimize the risks associated with PN, PN indications should be well known and nutrition-oriented training should be planned. We believe that the recommendations of the hospital nutritional support team (NDE) should be taken into consideration against the risk of inappropriate indication and insufficient calorie administration.

Özet

Amaç: Parenteral nütrisyon (PN), intravenöz beslenme sağlayan bir tedavi yöntemidir. PN klinik sonuçları iyileştirebildiği gibi, komplikasyonlara bağlı olarak mortalite ve morbiditede artışa neden olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmamızın amacı, PN endikasyonlarını değerlendirmek, uygun olmayan PN başlanma oranını belirlemek ve kalori yeterliliğini incelemektir. Yöntem: PN başlanan tüm hastalar, nütrisyon hemşiresi ve diyetisyen tarafından hastane veri tabanından belirlenerek ziyaret edildi. Hastaların demografik verileri, yattığı servisi, tanısı, PN uygunluğuna, endikasyonlarına, alınan kalori miktarı ve yeterliliğine bakıldı. PN alan her bir hasta, Avrupa Klinik Beslenme ve Metabolizma Derneği (ESPEN) klavuzuna göre incelenerek “uygun” ve “uygun olmayan” olarak sınıflandırıldı. Ayrıca PN alan hastalar, Periferal PN, Santral PN, Enteral+PN, Oral+PN olarak 4 kategoriye ayrıldı. Bulgular: Hastanemizde altı aylık süre boyunca 333 hastaya PN uygulandığı saptandı. PN’na, beslenmeye engel kusma (%37), obstrüktif bağırsak hastalığı (%27), ağır diyare (%12) ve ağır malabsorbsiyon (%12) nedeniyle başlanmıştı. Hastaların 153 (%45.9)’üne uygun olmayan endikasyon ile başlanmıştı. Uygun olmayan endikasyon nedenleri arasında en sık doktorun konservatif olarak PN tercih etmesinin (142 olgu, %92.8) olduğu görüldü. PN başlanan hastaların 256’sı (%76.9) yetersiz kalori almaktaydı. Hastaların beslenmesinde en sık periferik parenteral nütrisyon (PPN) (155 olgu, %46.5) yol tercih edilmiş, uygun olmayan endikasyon ile PN (%40) ve yetersiz kalori ile beslenme de (%98.1) bu grupta görülmüştür. Sonuç: Herhangi bir nedenle yeterli oral veya enteral beslenemeyen hastalara, tek başına PN veya enteral nütrisyona ek olarak PN başlanmaktadır. PN ile ilgili risklerin en aza indirilmesi için PN endikasyonları iyi bilinmeli, bunun için beslenme odaklı eğitimler planlanmalıdır. Uygun olmayan endikasyon ve yetersiz kalori uygulanma riskine karşı hastane nütrisyon destek ekibi (NDE)’nin önerilerinin dikkate alınması gerektiğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYAN, H. E. (2020). How Appropriate Are the Indications for Parenteral Nutrition Patients?. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 116–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/142466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chan S, Mc Cowen KC, Blackburn GL. Nutrition Management in the ICU. Chest. 1999;115:145-8.
  2. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40:159-211.
  3. Bozzetti F, Forbes A. The ESPEN clinical practice guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Present status and perspectives for future research. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:359- 64.
  4. Smyth ND, Neary E, Power S, Feehan S, Duggan SN. Assessing appropriateness of parenteral nutrition usage in an acute hospital. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013;28:232-6.
  5. Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, et al. EuroOOPS: An international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:340-9.
  6. Cotogni P. Management of parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2017;6:13.
  7. Van Gossum A, Cabre E, Hébuterne X, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Gastroenterology. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:415-27.
  8. Chima CS, Barco K, Dewitt MLA, Maeda M, Carlos Teran J, Mullen KD. Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and discharge status of patients hospitalized in the medicine service. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:975-8.
  9. Bistrian BR. Comment on “guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically Ill patient.” JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34:348-9.
  10. Thibault R, Heidegger C, Berger M, Pichard C. Parenteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: cautious use improves outcome. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:13997.
  11. Berger MM, Pichard C. Development and current use of parenteral nutrition in critical care - an opinion paper. Crit Care. 2014;18:1-10.
  12. Sugrue D, Jarrell AS, Kruer R, et al. Appropriateness of peripheral parenteral nutrition use in adult patients at an academ