Journals / Androloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Penile doppler ultrasonography: Techniques and interpretation

Penil doppler ultrasonografi: Teknik ve yorumlama

Pages
124–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since it is a technique dependent to the constructor, the established protocols should be standardized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Penile Doppler ultrasonographic imaging and associated intracavernosal injection for functional evaluation provide objective measurement of erectile hemodynamics while it is used in the diagnosis of corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD), arterial insufficiency, penile arteriovenous shunts, cavernosal fibrosis and Peyronie’s disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The advantage of the penile Doppler ultrasound is that the procedure is minimally invasive and can be used as a screening test in patients to identify normal arterial response of the cavernous arteries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since it is a technique dependent to the constructor, the established protocols should be standardized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Penile Doppler ultrasonographic imaging and associated intracavernosal injection for functional evaluation provide objective measurement of erectile hemodynamics while it is used in the diagnosis of corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD), arterial insufficiency, penile arteriovenous shunts, cavernosal fibrosis and Peyronie’s disease. The advantage of the penile Doppler ultrasound is that the procedure is minimally invasive and can be used as a screening test in patients to identify normal arterial response of the cavernous arteries. In Peyronie’s disease and to patients with erectile dysfunction unresponsive to treatment, Penile Doppler ultrasound should be offered before a history of pelvic trauma or fracture of the penile shaft or prior to more invasive vascular examinations. Since it is a technique dependent to the constructor, the established protocols should be standardized.

Özet

Penil Doppler ultrasonografik görüntüleme ve beraberinde fonksiyonel değerlendirme için yapılan intrakavernozal enjeksiyon, ereksiyon hemodinamisinin objektif bir şekilde ölçülmesini sağlarken korporeal veno-oklüsiv disfoksiyon (VOD), arteriyel yetmezlik, penil arteriovenöz şantlar, kavernozal fibrozis ve Peyronie hastalığı tanısında kullanılmaktadır. Penil Doppler ultrasonun avantajı prosedürün minimal invaziv olması ve kavernöz arterlerin normal arteryel tepkisini tanımlamak için hastalarda tarama testi olarak kullanılabilmesidir. Peyronie hastalığı, tedaviye yanıtsız erektil disfonksiyon, pelvik travma veya penis şaft kırığı öyküsü olan hastalara, daha invaziv olan vasküler incelemelerden önce penil Doppler ultrason önerilmelidir. Yapana bağımlı bir teknik olduğundan oluşturulan protokollerin standardizasyonu gerekmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

EFİLOĞLU, Ö., EROL, B. (2020). Penile doppler ultrasonography: Techniques and interpretation. Androloji Bülteni, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 124–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/142461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altinkilic B, Hauck EW, Weidner W. Evaluation of penile perfusion by color-coded duplex sonography in the management of erectile dysfunction. World J Urol 2004
  2. 361–4. [CrossRef] 2. Hatzimouratidis K, Giuliano F, Moncada I, Muneer A, Salonia A, Verze P. EAU Guidelines on Erectile Dysfunction, Premature Ejaculation, Penile Curvature and Priapism 2018. In: European Association of Urology Guidelines 2018 Edition. Volume presented at the EAU Annual Congress Copenhagen 2018., edn. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology Guidelines Office
  3. Pescatori ES, Drei B, Silingardi V. Advanced diagnostics in erectile dysfunction: beyond the concept of hemodynamics. J Endocrinol Invest 2003
  4. 125–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/12834038/ 4. Berookhim BM. Doppler Duplex Ultrasonography of the Penis. J Sex Med 2016
  5. 726–31. [CrossRef] 5. Jarow JP, Pugh VW, Routh WD, Dyer RB. Comparison of penile duplex ultrasonography to pudendal arteriography. Variant penile arterial anatomy affects interpretation of duplex ultrasonography. Invest Radiol 1993
  6. 806–10. [CrossRef] 6. Gill RW. Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985
  7. 625–41. [CrossRef ] 7. LeRoy TJ, Broderick GA. Doppler blood flow analysis of erectile function: who, when, and how. Urol Clin North Am 2011
  8. 147– 54. [CrossRef] 8. Biswas S, Biswas S. A Study on Penile Doppler. MOJ Surg 2017
  9. 196–201. [CrossRef] 9. Seyam R, Mohamed K, Akhras AA, Rashwan H. A prospective randomized study to optimize the dosage of trimix ingredients and compare its efficacy and safety with prostaglandin E1. Int J Impot Res 2005
  10. 346–53. [CrossRef] 10. Donatucci CF, Lue TF. The combined intracavernous injection and stimulation test: diagnostic accuracy. J Urol 1992
  11. 61–2. [CrossRef] 11. Incrocci L, Hop WC, Slob AK. Visual erotic and vibrotactile stimulation and intracavernous injection in screening men with erectile dysfunction: a 3 year experience with 406 cases. Int J Impot Res 1996
  12. 227–32. 12. Wilkins CJ, Sriprasad S, Sidhu PS. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the penis. Clin Radiol 2003
  13. 514–23. [CrossRef] 13. Altinbas NK, Hamidi N. Penile Doppler ultrasonography and elastography evaluation in patients with erectile dysfunction. Pol J Radiol 2018
  14. e491–9. [CrossRef] 14. Jung DC, Park SY, Lee JY. Penile Doppler ultrasonography revisited. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) 2018
  15. 16–24. [CrossRef] 15. Caretta N, Palego P, Roverato A, Selice R,