SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

The Issue of Making Administration Effective in Modern Political Philosophy: State, Power, and Freedom

Modern Politika Felsefesinde Yönetimin Etkili Hale Getirilmesi Meselesi: Devlet, Güç ve Özgürlük

DEVRİM ÖZKAN
Pages
59–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, this paper analyzes the issue of making the administration effective by taking into account the perspectives of the three leading philosophers of modern politics (Machiavelli, Hobbes and Locke).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the origins of the issue of how the administration can be made more effective, which is dealt with in modern political philosophy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Modern politics is shaped as a result of efforts to produce solutions to the problems caused by the processes of social change that begin with the modernization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, this paper analyzes the issue of making the administration effective by taking into account the perspectives of the three leading philosophers of modern politics (Machiavelli, Hobbes and Locke).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper examines the origins of the issue of how the administration can be made more effective, which is dealt with in modern political philosophy. Modern politics is shaped as a result of efforts to produce solutions to the problems caused by the processes of social change that begin with the modernization. The recognition of the fact that continuous change is inevitable leads to the emergence of problems about how administration can be made effective. Locke aims to establish the conditions guaranteeing the right to property and freedom by advocating the existence of a natural equality among all human beings. This leads to the understanding of administration as a phenomenon that becomes more effective through interactions between free individuals. In this context, this paper analyzes the issue of making the administration effective by taking into account the perspectives of the three leading philosophers of modern politics (Machiavelli, Hobbes and Locke).

Özet

Bu makale, modern politika felsefesinde yönetimin nasıl daha etkili hale getirilebileceği meselesinin kökenlerini inceler. Modern politika, modernleşme süreçleriyle başlayan toplumsal değişim süreçlerinin yol açtığı problemlere çözümler üretme çabalarının bir sonucu olarak biçimlenir. Sürekli değişimin kaçınılmaz olduğunun kabulü yönetimin nasıl etkili kılınabileceğine dair problemlerin ortaya çıkmasına neden olur. Locke, tüm insanlar arasında doğal bir eşitliğin varlığını savunarak mülkiyet hakkını ve özgürlüğü güvence altına alan koşulları egemen kılmayı amaçlar. Bu da yönetimin, özgür bireyler arasındaki etkileşimler vasıtasıyla daha etkili hale gelen bir olgu olarak kavranmasına yol açar. Bu çerçevede, bu makale modern politikanın başlıca üç filozofunun (Machiavelli, Hobbes ve Locke) kavrayışlarından hareketle ‘yönetimin etkili hale getirilmesi meselesi’ni analiz eder.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, D. (2019). The Issue of Making Administration Effective in Modern Political Philosophy: State, Power, and Freedom. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 59–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/142394

References (15)

  1. Acemoglu, D. ve J. A. Robinson. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Acemoglu, D. ve J. A. Robinson. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishing. Albritton, R. R. (1976). Hobbes on Political Science and Political Order. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 9(3), 464-472.
  3. Anderson, S. L. (2006). Mill’s Life. The Blackwell guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. (Ed. H. R. West). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Aquinas, T. ([1271-72] 2007). Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics. (Çev. R. J. Regan). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Aristoteles. ([M.Ö. 335–323] 2009). Politics. (Çev. E. Barker). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Arneil, B. (1996). John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  6. Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. (Çev. Daniela Gobetti). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Case, W. (2011). Electoral Authoritarianism and Backlash: Hardening Malaysia, oscillating Thailand. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 32 (4), 438-457.
  8. Congleton, R. D. (2011). Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Donaldson, P. S. (1942). Machiavelli and Mystery Of State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Donno, D. (2013). “Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes”. American Journal of Political Science, 57 (3), 703-716.
  11. Edwards, A. (2002). Hobbes. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. (Ed. A. Edwards ve J. Townshend). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Eray, Ş. (2009). Küreselleşme ve Bölgeselleşme İlişkisi: Merkeziyetçilikten Adem-i Merkeziyetçiliğe, Ulus Devletten Ulusüstü Birliklere ve Bölgeselleşmeye. Toplum ve Hekim, 24 (4-5), 264-274.
  12. Finn, S. J. (2006). Thomas Hobbes and The Politics Of Natural Philosophy. London: Continuum. Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and Power: On the Relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  13. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 3-18.
  14. Fukuyama, F. (2001). Natural Rights and Human History. The National Interest, 64, 19- 30. Fukuyama, F. (2001).
  15. Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third Wor