Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

Blockchain’s Potential Impact on Public Administration

Blokzincir (Blockchain)’in Kamu İdaresine Olası Etkileri Üzerine

Pages
117–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall goal being to make government more efficient, this adaptation process need to be addressed with only a competent and well-prepared public structure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public administration should adjust to the architecture of the Blockchain data convention, in which non governmental collective structures practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Public administration should focus swiftly on how to incorporate the Blockchain technology into service processes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall goal being to make government more efficient, this adaptation process need to be addressed with only a competent and well-prepared public structure.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Public administration should adjust to the architecture of the Blockchain data convention, in which non governmental collective structures practice. With this adjustment, Blockchain would be able to render the process of enforcing the rules of public administration open and legitimate, provided that it observes democratic consensus. Public administration should focus swiftly on how to incorporate the Blockchain technology into service processes. The overall goal being to make government more efficient, this adaptation process need to be addressed with only a competent and well-prepared public structure. In this respect, organizations should equip themselves with new visions; they should train and educate public administrators and civil servants who will create public value. The article approaches to this argument by evaluating the quality, functioning, dissimilarities, advantages, disadvantages, smart contracts, and usage of the Blockchain in the private sector and public administration both literatür works and World wide cases.

Özet

Kamu yönetimi, kendi dışındaki yapıların kullandıkları veri protokolü Blokzincir mimarisine uyum sağlamalıdır. Bu uyumla birlikte Blokzincir, demokratik uzlaşmayı gözetmek şartıyla kamu yönetiminin kuralları uygulatma sürecini açık ve meşru kılabilecektir. Kamu yönetimi Blokzincir teknolojisinin hizmet süreçlerine nasıl dahil edebileceğine hızlıca odaklanmalıdır. Devletin daha etkin işleyişi amacına yönelik olarak, bu uyum süreciyse yalnızca nitelikli, iyi hazırlanmış bir kamu teşkilatıyla inşa edilebilecektir. Bu açıdan teşkilatlar yeni vizyonlarla kendilerini geliştirmeli, kamusal değer üretecek kamu yönetici ve memurları yetiştirmelidirler. Makale bu sava Blokzincirin nitelikleri, işleyişi, farklılıkları, avantajları, dezavantajları, akıllı sözleşmeleri, özel sektörde ve kamu idaresindeki kullanımının literatür araştırmasıyla birlikte Dünya örneklerini de değerlendirerek varmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAT, N. (2019). Blockchain’s Potential Impact on Public Administration. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 117–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/142392

References (15)

  1. Akkoyunlu E.A., K. Ekanadham ve R.V. Hubert (1975). Some Constraints and Tradeoffs in The Design of Network Communications, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 9(5), 67-74, https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=806523#citedby (17.05.2018)
  2. Antonopoulos, A. (2014). Bitcoin Security Model: Trust by Computation, https://medium. com/@aantonop/bitcoin-security-model-trust-by-computation-d5b93a37da6e (14.10. 2018)
  3. Atzori M. (2017). Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: is the State Still Necessary?. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(1), 45-62, http://dx.doi. org/10.22495/jgr_v6_i1_p5 (10.02.2018)
  4. Augur (2019). Define: Augur Protocol, https://www.augur.net/faq/#define-augur-protocol (31.08.2018)
  5. Baran, P. (1964).
  6. On Distributed Communications, Memorandum RM-3420-PR, California: RAND Corporation, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memoranda/2006/RM3420.pdf (11.10.2018)
  7. Bauerle, N. (2018). What is the Difference Between a Blockchain and a Database?, https://www.coindesk.com/information/what-is-the-difference-blockchain-and-database (13.12.2018)
  8. Beck, R., C. Müller-Bloch ve J.L. King (2018).
  9. Governance in the Blockchain Economy, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020-1034, https://aisel. aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss10/1/ (03.01.2019)
  10. Belin, O. (2018). The Difference Between Blockchain & Distributed Ledger Technology, https://tradeix.com/distributed-ledger-technology/ (10.02.2019)
  11. Berryhill, J., T. Bourgery ve A. Hanson (2018). Blockchains Unchained: Blockchain Technology and its Use in the Public Sector, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 28, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/blockchains-unchained_3c32c429-en (23.06.2019)
  12. Blockchain.com (2019). Charts. https://www.blockchain.com/charts (21.07.2019) Blokchain Technology in Publıc Service Presentation Accenture (2016). Accenture Debuts Prototype of ‘Editable’ Blockchain for Enterprise and Permissioned Systems, https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/accenture-debuts-prototype-of-editable-blockchain-for-enterprise-and-permissioned-systems.htm (10.05.2019)
  13. Bower, J.L. ve C.M. Christensen (1995). Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave, Harvard Business Review, 73(1): 43–53, https://hbsp.harvard.edu/ (17.12.2018)
  14. Bruns, A. (2008).
  15. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: from Production to Produsage, New York: Peter Lang Inc. Cointelegraph (2019). WEF Head of Blockchain Sheila Warren This Tech Can Solve the Trust Crisis, https://cointelegraph.com/new