Journals / Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Influence Factors Analysis of Farmers’ Participation in Agricultural Machinery Support Using Random Utility Model in the Agri Province of Turkey

Pages
32–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained by the model, while the variables of household population, production of arable crops, and the existence of nonagricultural income had a significantly negative effect on participation in benefiting from machinery and equipment supports; the variables of irrigated land size, total amount of agricultural fields in the enterprise, and the existence of tractor(s) in the enterprise had a significantly positive effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increase in the level of mechanization in agriculture is a factor that promotes increase in productivity and also helps improve life standards in rural regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, factors that affect participation in benefiting from machinery and equipment supports were studied through the Ağrı province example.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained by the model, while the variables of household population, production of arable crops, and the existence of nonagricultural income had a significantly negative effect on participation in benefiting from machinery and equipment supports; the variables of irrigated land size, total amount of agricultural fields in the enterprise, and the existence of tractor(s) in the enterprise had a significantly positive effect.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Increase in the level of mechanization in agriculture is a factor that promotes increase in productivity and also helps improve life standards in rural regions. In this study, factors that affect participation in benefiting from machinery and equipment supports were studied through the Ağrı province example. The main material of the study consisted of primary data that was obtained from face to face meetings carried out with agricultural enterprises, which were registered in the Farmer Registration System of Ağrı province. The Probit Regression Analysis method was used to determine participation in benefiting/not benefiting from the support, the relationships between the socioeconomic factors that affect this act, as well as the relationship degrees. According to the results obtained by the model, while the variables of household population, production of arable crops, and the existence of nonagricultural income had a significantly negative effect on participation in benefiting from machinery and equipment supports; the variables of irrigated land size, total amount of agricultural fields in the enterprise, and the existence of tractor(s) in the enterprise had a significantly positive effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, O. (2019). Influence Factors Analysis of Farmers’ Participation in Agricultural Machinery Support Using Random Utility Model in the Agri Province of Turkey. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 32–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/142372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abay, C., Olhan, E., Uysal, Y., Yavuz, F., Türkekul, B., 2005. Türkiye’de tarım politikalarında değişim. VI. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası Teknik Kongresi Sonuç Bildirgesi 7. Anonymous, 2011. Kırsal Kalkınma Planı (2010-2013).
  2. Ankara, Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı. Anonymous, 2012. Kırsal Kalkınma Yatırımlarının Desteklenmesi Programı Çerçevesinde Makina ve Ekipman Alımlarının Desteklenmesi Programı Uygulama Rehberi. Ankara. Anonymous, 2013. Ağrı'nın Sosyo-Ekonomik Durumu ve Uygun Yatırım Alanları, in: Tutar, D.H. (Ed.). T.C. Serhat Kalkınma Ajansı Ağrı Yatırım Destek Ofisi Ağrı. Anonymous, 2014. Kırsal Kalkınma Yatırımlarının Desteklenmesi Programı Kapsamında Makine ve Ekipman Alımlarının Desteklenmesi Hakkında Tebliğ T.C. Başbakanlık, Ankara. Anonymous, 2015. Ağrı Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık İl Müdürlüğü 2014
  3. Yılı Faaliyet Raporu. Ağrı. Arı, A., Önder, H., 2013. Farklı Veri Yapılarında Kullanılabilecek Regresyon Yöntemleri. Arıöz, M., 2007. Ağrı ilinde tarım işletmelerinin tarımsal yapı ve mekanizasyon özellikleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Çiçek, A., Erkan, O., 1996. Tarım ekonomisinde araştırma ve örnekleme yöntemleri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
  6. Demir, N., Yavuz, F., 2010. An analysis on factors effective in benefiting from forage crops support. Scientific Research And Essays 5(15), 2022-2026.
  7. Erdal, G., Erdal, H., Gürkan, M., 2013. Türkiye’de Uygulanan Tarımsal Desteklerin Üretici Açısından Değerlendirilmesi (Kahramanmaraş İli Örneği). Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Bilimler Dergisi ISSN, 1307-1149.
  8. Evcim, H.Ü., Ulusoy, E., Gülsoylu, E., Tekin, B., 2010. Tarımsal mekanizasyon durumu, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi, 11-15.
  9. Greene, W.H., 2003. Econometric analysis. Pearson Education India. Hubbell, B.J., Marra, M.C., Carlson, G.A., 2000. Estimating the demand for a new technology: Bt cotton and insecticide policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(1), 118-132.
  10. İleri, M., 2016. Türkiye Tarım Makinaları Sektörü Sektör Raporu. TARMAKBİR. Karakayacı, Z., Oğuz, C., 2006. Konya İli Ereğli İlçesinde Satışa Konu Olan Arazilere Sahip Tarım İşletmelerinin Sermaye Yapısı. Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi(1), 23-30.
  11. Karlı, B., Bilgiç, A., Çelik, Y., 2006. Factors affecting farmers’ decision to enter agricultural cooperatives using random utility model in the South Eastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics