Journals / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 34 Issue: 3

The final state of prosthesis and orbita of A patient who has never taken off the anterior segment of the prothesis for eighteen years

Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-07-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aimed to present the interesting case of this patient, whose prothesis were creating no problems, and were kept on during the eighteen year period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A 56 year old woman came to our clinic with complaints of rheum in her eye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has been understood that eighteen years before her story, the patient underwent an evisceration surgery after the reparation of her penetrating left eye, and after the third month of the operation, she didn’t go to the examinations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aimed to present the interesting case of this patient, whose prothesis were creating no problems, and were kept on during the eighteen year period.
🔬Design:Report
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Orbita · Evisceration · Ocular prosthesis

Abstract

A 56 year old woman came to our clinic with complaints of rheum in her eye. It has been understood that eighteen years before her story, the patient underwent an evisceration surgery after the reparation of her penetrating left eye, and after the third month of the operation, she didn’t go to the examinations. During the consulation the patient only had complaints about rheum, and it has been understood that the patient had no additional problems, besides the irregularities developing on the surface of the prothesis. We aimed to present the interesting case of this patient, whose prothesis were creating no problems, and were kept on during the eighteen year period.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçak, N. (2018). The final state of prosthesis and orbita of A patient who has never taken off the anterior segment of the prothesis for eighteen years. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Volume: 34 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1423426

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Berkan, O.,1982.
  2. Ege University, Dentistry Faculty Journal. 5, 75-79.
  3. Beumer, J., Curlis, J.A., Firteil, D.N., 1979. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St.Louis. Bozkurt, B., Akyurek, N., Irkec, M., Erdener, U., Memıs, L., 2007. Immun histochemical findings in prosthesis associated giant papillary conjoctivitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 35, 535-540.
  4. Chalin, A.V., Drane, J.B., Standish, S.M., 1971.
  5. Maxillofacial Prosthetics, The Williams and Williams Co., Baltimore. Chena, D., Hehera, K., 2004. Management of the anophthalmic socket in pediatric patients. Curr Op in Ophthalmol. 15, 449-453.
  6. Covillard, P., Schaff, G.N., 1976. Fabrication of the ocular portion of an orbital prosthesis J. Prosthet. Dent. 35, 478- 481. Parr, G.R., Goldman, B.M., Rahn, A.O., 1983. Surgical considerations in the prosthetic treatment of ocular and orbital defects, J. Prosthet. Dent. 49, 379-385.
  7. Raizada, K., Rani, D., 2007. Ocular Prosthesis. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 30, 152-162.
  8. Taner, P., Yazıc, B., Akarsu, C., Demirbas, E., Ergın, A., 2003. Bacterial colonization in anopthalmic socket. T Oft Gaz. 33, 484-487.
  9. Yazıcıoglu, H., Yalug, S., Tuzur, B., 2001. Ocular Prosthesis. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Dentistry Faculty.