AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightMR urography examinations were made on a total of 39 patients, composed of 25 boys and 14 girls, within a 3-year period."
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
I am writing to bring to your attention certain corrections that need to be made to an article published in the Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine. The article titled "Magnetic resonance urography in the assessment of congenital urinary system dilatation in pediatric patients," authored by Rabia Mihriban KILINÇ (corresponding author), Irmak DURUR SUBAŞI, and Afak DURUR KAYA, and accepted on May 21, 2013, with DOI number 10.5835/jecm.omu.30.03.002, requires rectification due to identified errors. Upon careful review, the following corrections are necessary: 1. In the abstract section, the phrase "….between 2009-2012,…" in the third line needs to be removed. 2. Under the "2. Material and method" section, within the "Study Group" subsection, the following text needs to be replaced: Original: "The study has been performed through retrospective assessment on patients who applied to Erzurum State Research and Training Hospital Department of Urology and Pediatrics and on whom MR urography study was performed between 2009 and 2012 out of forty-two patients in ages between 1 month and 17 years, MR urography examinations were made on totally 39 patients composed of 25 boys and 14 girls within 3 years period." Corrected: "The study has been performed through retrospective assessment on patients who applied to Ankara University School of Medicine Department of Urology and Pediatrics and on whom MR urography study was performed between 2004 and 2008 out of forty-two patients in ages between 1 month and 17 years. MR urography examinations were made on a total of 39 patients, composed of 25 boys and 14 girls, within a 3-year period."