Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Nonarthritic Hip Score

Pages
414–422
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NAHS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for young and physically active patients with hip pain

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) into Turkish and determine the validity and reliability of the translated version in physically active patients with hip pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty young to middle-aged and physically active patients (34 women and 26 men; mean age=35 years; age range: 18-40 years) with hip pain were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NAHS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for young and physically active patients with hip pain
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) into Turkish and determine the validity and reliability of the translated version in physically active patients with hip pain. Methods: Sixty young to middle-aged and physically active patients (34 women and 26 men; mean age=35 years; age range: 18-40 years) with hip pain were included in the study. The original version of the NAHS was first translated into Turkish and back-translated into English by two bilingual translators each. The back-translated version was compared with the initial English version by a committee of the four translators. The Turkish version was then tested with 15 patients with hip pain and 15 healthy individuals. The participants were asked whether they had difficulties in understanding the questions. Subsequently, the questionnaire was accepted for use in the study population. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. The construct validity was determined via the Pearson correlation coefficient between the NAHS and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Floor and ceiling effects were analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to test construct validity. Results: An ICC of 0.994 and Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.908 were obtained; thus, the Turkish version of the NAHS was reliable. Neither floor nor ceiling effects (15%) were found in the sub-parameters (8.3-1.7%) and the total score (1.7%) of the NAHS. The EFA test showed that this questionnaire had four factors. Model fit indices in CFA were χ2/df=2.23, Tucker– Lewis index=0.90, comparative fit index=0.91, goodness of fit index=0.63, root mean square error of approximation=0.14 (90% CI: 0.12-0.16). The NAHS total score showed an excellent correlation with WOMAC (r=-0.909), mHHS (r=0.850), and SF-12 (r=0.811) scores. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the NAHS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for young and physically active patients with hip pain

🔖

Cite This Article

KANIK, Z. H., SÖZLÜ, U., ÖLMEZ, S. B., BAŞAR, S., KANATLI, U. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Nonarthritic Hip Score. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 414–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/142247

References (14)

  1. Diaz-Ledezma C, Lichstein PM, Maltenfort M, Restrepo C, Parvizi J. Pattern of impact of femoroacetabular impingement upon health-related quality of life: The determinant role of extra-articular factors. Qual Life Res 2013
  2. [Crossref] 2. Freke MD, Kemp J, Svege I, Risberg MA, Semciw A, Crossley KM. Physical impairments in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of the evidence. Br J Sports Med 2016
  3. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096152. Epub 2016 Jun 14. [Crossref] 3. Picavet HS, Hoeymans N. Health related quality of life in multiple musculoskeletal diseases: SF-36 and EQ-5D in the DMC3 study. Ann Rheu Dis. 2004
  4. [Crossref] 4. Frank JM, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, et al. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: A systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015
  5. [Crossref] 5. Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaulé PE. Prevalence of camtype femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010
  6. [Crossref] 6. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesæter IØ, Eastwood DM, Engesæter LB, Rosendahl K. Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology 2011
  7. [Crossref] 7. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA. Hip injuries in athletes. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010
  8. 48(6): 1155-1178. [Crossref] 8. Frank JS, Gambacorta PL, Eisner EA. Hip pathology in the adolescent athlete. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013
  9. [Crossref] 9. Giordano BD. Assessment and treatment of hip pain in the adolescent athlete. Pediatr Clin North Am 2016
  10. [Crossref] 10. Ward D, Parvizi J. Management of hip pain in young adults. Orthop Clin North Am 2016
  11. [Crossref] 11. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient‐reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 2007
  12. [Crossref] 12. Baumann F, Weber J, Zeman F, et al. Validation of a German version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (G-iHOT33) according to the COSMIN checklist: How much improvement is clinically relevant? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016
  13. [Crossref] 13. Tijssen M, van Cingel R, van Melick N, de Visser E. Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaires for hip arthroscopy: A systematic review of the psychometric evidence. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2011
  14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-