Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Effects of Kinesio Taping on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and overall health status in patients with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome: A singleblind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Pages
394–401
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of kinesio taping (KT) on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and overall health status in patients with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome (sTOS).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of kinesio taping (KT) on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and overall health status in patients with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome (sTOS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study duration was defined as 12 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: KT can provide benefits in terms of relieving pain and paresthesia, as well as improving the upper limb function and quality of life in patients with sTOS.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of kinesio taping (KT) on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and overall health status in patients with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome (sTOS). Methods: A single-blind placebo-controlled design was employed in this study. The study duration was defined as 12 months. Analyses were performed on 60 patients with sTOS randomly assigned to KT (4 men and 26 women; mean age=33.5 years, range=20–46 years) and control groups (5 men and 25 women; mean age=26 years, range=20–43 years). KT was applied to the KT group three times. The control group received placebo taping. Pain and paresthesia were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain (10 cm) and VAS paresthesia (10 cm). The upper limb function was assessed using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The overall health status was evaluated based on the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Each assessment was carried out at baseline (t0), posttreatment (t1), and 8 weeks after baseline (t2). Results: In the KT group, except the social isolation domain of the NHP, all outcome measures showed improvement from t0 to t1. At the second follow-up visit (t2), improvements remained visible compared with baseline. However, none of the variables improved from t1 to t2. Otherwise, all measures deteriorated slightly, and the deteriorations in VAS for pain, NHP pain, NHP sleep, and NHP physical abilities were statistically significant (p=0.041, p=0.048, p=0.013, and p=0.016, respectively). In the control group, only VAS for paresthesia and NHP emotional reaction showed improvement over time (p=0.002 and p=0.044, respectively). When changes in outcome measures between the two groups were compared, except NHP emotional reaction and NHP social isolation, median changes (from t0 to t1) were higher in the KT group than in the control group (p<0.05 for all variables). Regarding VAS pain, VAS paresthesia, DASH, and three NHP domains (energy level, pain, and physical abilities), changes from t0 to t2 were also higher in the KT group (p<0.05 for all variables). Conclusion: KT can provide benefits in terms of relieving pain and paresthesia, as well as improving the upper limb function and quality of life in patients with sTOS.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORTAÇ, E. A., SARPEL, T., BENLİDAYI, İ. C. (2020). Effects of Kinesio Taping on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and overall health status in patients with symptomatic thoracic outlet syndrome: A singleblind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 394–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/142246

References (2)

  1. Kuhn JE, Lebus V GF, Bible JE. Thoracic outlet syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23: 222-32. [Crossref] 2. Buller LT, Jose J, Baraga M, Lesniak B. Thoracic outlet syndrome: Current concepts, imaging features, and therapeutic strategies. Am J Orthop 2015; 44: 376-82. 3. Watson LA, Pizzari T, Balster S. Thoracic outlet syndrome part 1: Clinical manifestations, differentiation and treatment pathways. Man Ther 2009; 14: 586-95. [Crossref] 4. Laulan J. Thoracic outlet syndromes. The so-called “neurogenic types”. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35: 155-64. [Crossref] 5. Brantigan CO, Roos DB. Etiology of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 17-22. [Crossref] 6. Watson LA, Pizzari T, Balster S. Thoracic outlet syndrome part 2: Conservative management of thoracic outlet. Man Ther 2010; 15: 305-14. [Crossref] 7. Crosby CA, Wehbé MA. Conservative treatment for thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 43-9. [Crossref] 8. Subası V, Cakir T, Arica Z, et al. Comparison of efficacy of kinesiological taping and subacromial injection therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 2016; 35: 741-6. [Crossref] 9. Kaya E, Zinnuroglu M, Tugcu I. Kinesio taping compared to physical therapy modalities for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 2011; 30: 201-7. [Crossref] 10. Finlayson HC, O’Connor RJ, Brasher PM, Travlos A. Botulinum toxin injection for management of thoracic outlet syndrome: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pain 2011; 152: 2023-8. [Crossref] 11. Brantigan CO, Roos DB. Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 27-36. [Crossref] 12. Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method 2nd ed. 2003,
  2. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd., Toyko. 13. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8. [Crossref] 14. Duger T, Yakut E, Oksuz C, et al. Kol Omuz ve El Sorunları (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH) Anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliliği ve geçerliliği. Fizyoter Rehabil 2006; 17: 99-107. 15. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn 1980; 2: 231-46. [Crossref] 16. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 1985; 35: 185-8. 17. Kücükdeveci