SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations / 2010 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3

Is Anesthesiologist’s experience important while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with the right pressure?

Endotrakeal tüp kafının doğru basınçta şişirilmesinde anestezistin deneyimi önemli mi?

Alkin Çolak
Cavidan Arar
Sevtap Hekimoğlu Şahin
Ali Söker
İşıl Günday
Nesrin Turan
Pages
195–198
Publication Date
2010-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference between Group II and Group I were statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Cuff pressure in endotracheal tubes should be in the range of 26–30 cm H2O.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the training year of the anesthesia research assistant resident inflating the endotracheal tube (ET) cuff.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between Group II and Group I were statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Genel anestezi · endotrakeal entübasyon · kaf basıncı

Abstract

Objectives: Cuff pressure in endotracheal tubes should be in the range of 26–30 cm H2O. In this study we aimed to examine whether anesthesiologist\'s experience is important while inflating the endotracheal tube correctly after the intubation. Materials and methods: The patients who were included to the study were intubated after the induction of general anesthesia. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the training year of the anesthesia research assistant resident inflating the endotracheal tube (ET) cuff. Group I (n=64) the cuff pressure which were inflated by the first year residents; Group II (n=92) the cuff pressure which were inflated by the 2nd year residents; Group III (n=144) the cuff pressure which were inflated by the 3rd year residents; Group IV (n=93) the cuff pressure which were inflated by the 4th year residents were measured by manometer. Results: When we compared the cases in which the cuff pressure were between 26-30cm H2O we found that the best results were in Group II and respectively in Group III and IV and the worst results were in Group I. The difference between Group II and Group I were statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Endotrakeal kaf basıncı 26-30 cm H2O arasında şişirilmelidir. Bu çalışmada entübasyondan sonra kafın doğru şişirilmesinde anestezistlerin deneyimini araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya alınan olgular genel anestezi indüksiyonundan sonra entübe edildi. Olgular entübasyon tüpünün kafını şişiren anestezi araştırma görevlilerinin eğitim yılına göre dört gruba ayrıldı. Grup I (n=64) 1 yıllık deneyimi olan araştırma görevlilerinin şişirdiği kafların basınçları; Grup II (n=92) 2 yıllık deneyimi olan araştırma görevlilerinin şişirdiği kafların basınçları; Grup III (n=144) 3 yıllık deneyimi olan araştırma görevlilerinin şişirdiği kafların basınçları; Grup IV (n=93) 4 yıllık deneyimi olan araştırma görevlilerinin şişirdiği kafların basınçları manometre ile ölçülerek kaydedildi. Bulgular: Kaf basınçlarının değerlendirilmesi 26-30 cm H2O arasında şişirilen olgular karşılaştırıldığında en iyi Grup II olmak üzere sırasıyla Grup III, Grup IV ve en kötü Grup I olduğu saptandı. Grup II ile Grup I arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Çolak, A., Arar, C., Şahin, S. H., Söker, A., Günday, İ., Turan, N. (2010). Is Anesthesiologist’s experience important while inflating the endotracheal tube cuff with the right pressure?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2010.03.0040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Henderson J. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD, ed. Miller’s Anesthesia, seventh edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010:1573-610.
  2. Fan CM, Ko PC, Tsai K, et al. Tracheal rupture complicat- ing emergency endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2004;22:289- 93.
  3. Guyton DC, Barlow MR, Besselievre TR. Influence of air- way pressure on minimum occlusive endotracheal tube cuff pressure. Crit Care Med 1997;25:91-4.
  4. Nordin U. The trachea and cuff induced tracheal injury: an experimental study on causative factors and prevention. Acta Otolaryngol 1976;345(Suppl 345):1-7.
  5. Braz JR, Navarro LH, Takata IH, Nascimento Junior P. Endo- tracheal tube cuff pressure: need for precise measurement. Sao Paulo Med J 1999;117:243-7.
  6. Fernandez R, Blanch L, Mancebo J, Bonsoms N, Artigas A. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure assessment: pitfalls of finger estimation and need for objective measurement. Crit Care Med 1990;18:1423-6.
  7. Turan A, Tükenmez B, Karamanlıoğlu B, Süt N, Pamukçu Z. Peroperatif kanama değerlendirilmesinde bir model: Anestezist-cerrah ve deneyim farkı. T Klin Anest Reanim 2004;2:12-6.
  8. Gottschalk A, Burmeister MA, Blanc I, Schulz F, Standl T. Rupture of the trachea after emergency endotracheal intu- bation. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2003;38:59-61.
  9. Striebel HW, Pinkwart LU, Karavias T. Tracheal rupture caused by over inflation of endotracheal tube cuff. Anaes- thesist 1995;44:186-8.
  10. LoCicero J. Tracheo-carotid artery erosion following endo- tracheal intubation. J Trauma 1984;24:907-9.
  11. Mandoe H, Nikolajsen L, Lintrup U, Jepsen D, Molgaard J. Sore throat after endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992;74:897-900.
  12. Curiel Garcia JA, Guerrero-Romero F, Rodriguez-Moran M. Cuff pressure in endotracheal intubation: should it be routinely measured? Gac Med Mex 2001;137:179-82.
  13. Hahnel J, Treiber H, Konrad F, et al. A comparison of differ- ent endotracheal tubes. Tracheal cuff seal, peak centering and the incidence of postoperative sore throat. Anaesthesist 1993;42:232-7.
  14. Reed MF, Mathisen DJ: Tracheoesophageal fistula. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2003;13:271-89.
  15. Pelc P, Prigogine T, Bisschop P, Jortay A. Tracheoesopha- geal fistula: case report and review of literature. Acta Oto- rhinolaryngol Belg 2001;55:273-8.
  16. Liu H, Chen JC, Holinger LD, Gonzalez-Crussi F. Histo- pathologic fundamentals of acquired laryngeal stenosis. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med 1995;15:655-77.
  17. Evrard C, Pelouze GA, Quesnel J. Iatrogenic tracheal and left bronchial stenoses. Uncommon complication of Car- lens tube. Apropos of a case surgically treated in a single stage. Ann Chir 1990;44:149-56.
  18. Lomholt N. A device for measuring the lateral wall cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992;36:775-8.
  19. Nordin U, Lindholm CE, Wolgast M. Blood flow in the rab- bit tracheal mucosa under normal conditions and under the influence of tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1977;21:81-94.
  20. Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of ef- fects of four large volume cuffs. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288:965-8.
  21. Congreve K, Gardner I, Laxton C, Scrutton M. Where is T5? A survey of anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2006;61:453–5.