Journals / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of optimal designs for concrete cantilever retaining walls in different soils

Pages
39–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results illustratethat the artificial bee colony algorithm was a favor-ablemetaheuristic optimization method togainoptimum designs of concrete canti-lever retaining wall.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the investigation of the optimum designs for two types of concrete can-tilever retaining walls was conductedutilizing the artificial bee colony algorithm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sta-bility conditions like safety factors of sliding, overturningand bearing capacity and some geometric instancesdue to inherent of the wall were considered as the design constraints.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results illustratethat the artificial bee colony algorithm was a favor-ablemetaheuristic optimization method togainoptimum designs of concrete canti-lever retaining wall.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, the investigation of the optimum designs for two types of concrete can-tilever retaining walls was conductedutilizing the artificial bee colony algorithm. Sta-bility conditions like safety factors of sliding, overturningand bearing capacity and some geometric instancesdue to inherent of the wall were considered as the design constraints. The effect of the existence of the key in wall design on the objective func-tion was probed for changeableproperties of foundation and backfill soils. In optimi-zation analysis, the concrete of the wall, which directly affectsparameters such as carbon dioxide emission and the cost,was considered as the objective function and analyzes were performed according to different discrete design variables. The opti-mum concrete cantilever retaining wall designs satisfying constraints of stability conditions and geometric instanceswere obtained for different soil cases. Optimum designs of concrete cantilever retaining wall with the key were attained in some soil cases which were not foundthe feasible optimum solution of the concrete cantilever retaining wall. Results illustratethat the artificial bee colony algorithm was a favor-ablemetaheuristic optimization method togainoptimum designs of concrete canti-lever retaining wall.

🔖

Cite This Article

URAY, E., ÇARBAŞ, S., ERKAN, İ. H., OLGUN, M. (2020). Investigation of optimal designs for concrete cantilever retaining walls in different soils. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 39–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/142194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ACI 318-08(2008).ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.American Concrete Institute. AASHTO (2010). American Association of State Highway and Trans-portationOfficials LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Akay B, Karaboga D (2012). A modified artificial bee colony algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Information Sciences, 192, 120-142.
  2. Camp C, Akin A (2012). Design of retaining walls using big bang–big crunch optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(3), 438-448.
  3. Das BM (2016). Principles of foundation engineering. Cengage Learn-ing, Eighth Edition.
  4. Deb K (2000). An efficient constraint handling method for genetic al-gorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186 (2-4), 311-338.
  5. Dorigo M, Gambardella LM (1997). Ant colonies for the travelling sales-man problem. Biosystems,43(2), 73-81.
  6. Gandomi, AH, Kashani AR, Roke DA, Mousavi M (2015). Optimization of retaining wall design using recent swarm intelligence techniques. Engineering Structures, 103, 72-84.
  7. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation, 76(2), 60-68.
  8. Goldberg DE (1989). Genetic algorithms and Walsh functions: part I, a gentle introduction. Complex Systems, 3 (2), 129-152.
  9. Karaboga D (2005). An idea based on honeybee swarm form numerical optimization, Technical Report TR06, Erciyes University, Turkey. Karaboga D, Akay B (2011). A modified artificial bee colony (ABC) al-gorithm for constrained optimization problems. Applied Soft Com-puting, 11(3), 3021-3031.
  10. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceed-ings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, 1942-1948.
  11. Meyerhof GG (1963). Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1(1),16–26.
  12. Rajabioun R (2011). Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Applied Soft Com-puting, 11(8), 5508-5518. Rankine W (1857). Earth Pressure Theory. Phil. Trans. ofthe Royal Soc. Sarıbaş A, Erbatur F (1996). Optimization and sensitivity of retaining structures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(8), 649-656.
  13. Temür R, BekdaşG (2016). Teaching learning-based optimization for design of cantilever retaining walls. Structural Engineering and Me-chanics, 57(4), 763–783.
  14. Uray E, Çarbaş S, Erkan İH, Tan Ö (2019). Parametric investigation for discrete optimal design of a cantilever retaining wall. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5(3), 108-120.
  15. Yang XS (2009). Firefl