Journals / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Metaheuristic algorithms in optimum design of reinforced concrete beam by investigating strength of concrete

Pages
26–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that using high strength material for high flex-ural moment capacity has lower cost than low stretch concrete since doubly rein-forced design is not an optimum choice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The locations of structural members can be provided according to architectural pro-jects in the design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The design of dimensions isthe subject of civil engineering, and these designs are done according to the expe-rience of the designer by considering the regulation suggestions, but these dimen-sions and the required reinforcement plan may not be optimum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that using high strength material for high flex-ural moment capacity has lower cost than low stretch concrete since doubly rein-forced design is not an optimum choice.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The locations of structural members can be provided according to architectural pro-jects in the design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The design of dimensions isthe subject of civil engineering, and these designs are done according to the expe-rience of the designer by considering the regulation suggestions, but these dimen-sions and the required reinforcement plan may not be optimum. For that reason, the dimensions and detailed reinforcement design of RC structures can be found by using optimization methods. To reach optimum results, metaheuristic algorithms can be used. In this study, several metaheuristic algorithms such as harmony search, bat al-gorithm and teaching learning-based optimization are used in the design of several RC beams for cost minimization. The optimum results are presented for different strength of concrete. The results show that using high strength material for high flex-ural moment capacity has lower cost than low stretch concrete since doubly rein-forced design is not an optimum choice. The results prove that a definite metaheuris-tic algorithm cannot be proposed for the best optimum design of an engineering problem. According to the investigation of compressive strength of concrete, it can be said that a low strength material are optimum for low flexural moment, while a high strength material may be the optimum one by the increase of the flexural mo-ment as expected.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSOY, S., KAYABEKİR, A. E., BEKDAŞ, G., NİGDELİ, S. M. (2020). Metaheuristic algorithms in optimum design of reinforced concrete beam by investigating strength of concrete. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 26–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/142193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ACI 318M-05 (2005). Building code requirements for structural con-crete and commentary.American Concrete Institute. Akin A, Saka MP (2010). Optimum Detailed Design of Reinforced Con-crete Continuous Beams using the Harmony Search Algorithm, In: B.H.V. Topping, J.M. Adam, F.J. Pallarés, R. Bru, M.L. Romero, (Edi-tors), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Compu-tational Structures Technology, Civil-Comp Press,
  2. Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 131. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2013). Optimization of T-shaped RC flexural members for different compressive strengths of concrete. Interna-tional Journal of Mechanics,7,109-119.
  3. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2014a). Optimization of slender reinforced con-crete columns. 85th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 10-14 March 2014,
  4. Erlangen, Germany. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2014b). Optimization of RC frame structures subjected to static loading. 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics, 20-25 July 2014,
  5. Barcelona, Spain. Bekdas G (2014). Optimum design of axially symmetric cylindrical re-inforced concrete walls. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 51(3), 361-375.
  6. Bekdaş G (2015). Harmony Search algorithm approachfor optimum design of post-tensioned axially symmetric cylindrical reinforced concrete walls. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164(1), 342-358.
  7. Camp CV, Akin A (2012). Design of retaining walls using big bang–big crunch optimization.Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 138(3), 438-448.
  8. Camp CV, Huq F (2013). CO2and cost optimization of reinforced con-crete frames using a big bang-big crunch algorithm.Engineering Structures, 48, 363-372.
  9. Camp CV, Pezeshk S, Hansson H (2003). Flexural design of reinforced concrete frames using a genetic algorithm.Journal of Structural En-gineering-ASCE, 129, 105-11.
  10. Ceranic B, Freyer C, Baines RW (2001). An application of simulated an-nealing to the optimum design reinforced concrete retaining struc-ture. Computers and Structures,79, 1569-1581.
  11. Coello CC, Hernandez FS, Farrera FA (1997). Optimal design of rein-forced concrete beams using genetic algorithms.Expert Systems with Applications,12, 101-108.
  12. Ferreira CC, Barros MHFM, Barros AFM (2003). Optimal design of rein-forced concrete T-sections in bending. Engineering Structures, 25, 951-964.
  13. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony Search.Simulation, 76, 60-68.
  14. Jahjouh MM, Arafa MH, Alqedra MA (2013). Artificial Bee C