Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of Quality Focus Leadership on Quality Performance by Structural Equation Modelling

Kalite Odaklı Liderliğin Kalite Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli İle Analizi

Pages
149–165
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis made, it was found that the quality-focused leadership has a significant effect on training, employee relations, customer relations and quality performance positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of quality-focused leadership on education, customer and employee relationships and quality performance was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, survey data were collected from 170 manufacturing companies operating in Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş and Adıyaman.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis made, it was found that the quality-focused leadership has a significant effect on training, employee relations, customer relations and quality performance positively.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effect of quality-focused leadership on education, customer and employee relationships and quality performance was investigated. In addition, the effect of training on the customer and employee relationships has been examined. For this purpose, survey data were collected from 170 manufacturing companies operating in Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş and Adıyaman. The data were analyzed by the structural equation model. As a result of the analysis made, it was found that the quality-focused leadership has a significant effect on training, employee relations, customer relations and quality performance positively. It was found that education significantly influenced customer relationships and employee relations positively.

Özet

Bu çalışmada kalite odaklı liderliğin eğitim, müşteri ve çalışan ilişkileri ile kalite performansı üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada eğitimin müşteri ve çalışan ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş ve Adıyaman illerinde faaliyet göstermekte olan 170 imalat firmasından anket ile veri toplanmıştır. Veriler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz neticesinde kalite odaklı liderliğin eğitimi, çalışan ilişkilerini, müşteri ilişkilerini ve kalite performansını pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Eğitimin müşteri ilişkileri ve çalışan ilişkilerini pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, B. (2019). Analysis of Quality Focus Leadership on Quality Performance by Structural Equation Modelling. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 149–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/142129

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ahire, S. L., & Ravichandran, T. (2001). An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(4), 445–464.
  2. Antonaros, M. E. (2010). Gender differences in leadership style: A study of leader effectiveness in higher education. ERIC. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(5-A), 1550. Bon, A. T., & Mustafa, E. M. (2013). Impact of total quality management on innovation in service organizations: Literature review and new conceptual framework. Procedia Engineering, 53, 516–529.
  3. Conti, T. (2012). Building total quality: A guide for management. Springer Science & Business Media. Çakır, S. Y., & Eğinli, A. T. (2010). Memnun çalışanlar memnun müşteriler (1. Baskı). Ankara:
  4. Detay Yayıncılık. Çetin, C. (2015). Toplam kalite yönetimi (5. Baskı). İstanbul:
  5. Beta Basım. Dağlı, A. (2015). Örgütsel muhalefet ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(53). 198-218.
  6. Dahlgaard, J. J., Khanji, G. K., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Fundamentals of total quality management. Routledge. De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Dorion, E. C. H., Coallier, F., & Olea, P. M. (2016). The use of organisational resources for product innovation and organisational performance: A survey of the Brazilian furniture industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 135–147.
  7. Deming, W. E. (1986).
  8. Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for advanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA, 510. Deming, W. E. (2000). The new economics: For industry, government, education. MIT press. Efil, İ. (2016). Toplam kalite yönetimi (8. Baskı). Bursa: Dora Basım-Yayın Dağıtım. Eren, E., Alpkan, L., & Erol, Y. (2005). Temel fonksiyonel yeteneklerin firmaların yenilik ve finansal performansına etkileri. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 201–224.
  9. Eren, E. (2016). Yönetim ve organizasyon çağdaş ve küresel yaklaşımlar (12. Baskı). İstanbul:
  10. Beta Basım. Ersoy, M. S., & Ersoy, A. (2015). Kalite yönetimi, toplam kalite yönetimi ve kalite denetimi (2. Baskı). Ankara:
  11. İmaj Yayınevi.
  12. Forza, C., & Filippini, R. (1998). TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(1), 1–20.
  13. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri felsefe, yöntem, analiz (3. Baskı). Ankara:
  14. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Halis, M. (2008). Toplam kalite