SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 37

Evaluation Of Non-Reactive Nst At Low Risk Pregnancy

Nonreaktif Nst Ön Tanısının Düşük Riskli Gebeliklerde Değerlendirilmesi

Ayla Aktulay(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Yaprak Engin Üstün(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Elif Gül Yapar Eyi(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Özlem Yörük(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Necati Hançerlioğulları(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Leyla Mollamahmutoğlu(Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Ankara-TÜRKİYE)
Pages
1542–1545
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the number of primary caesarean sections was 2,669 19.98 % , the caesarean section ratio was found to be 43.06 % for the 281 deliveries diagnosed with non-reactive NST.Conclusion: Increased ratio of primary caesarean section in patients diagnosed with non-reactive NST has been displayed in our study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim is to evaluate the perinatal and obstetric results of the pregnant women admitted with the diagnosis of non-reactive NST.Material and methods: 405 women with pregnancies of 36 weeks and over, visiting our antenatal clinic during May 2011 – May 2012, and being admitted to the Delivery Unit with non-reactive NST pre-diagnosis were evaluated in a retrospective study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mode of delivery and perinatal results were compared total of 14,650 patients admitted to the Delivery Unit in one year.Results: It was determined that of the 14,650 patients admitted to the Delivery Unit, 405 2.76 % were admitted due presumptive to non-reactive NST pre-diagnosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the number of primary caesarean sections was 2,669 19.98 % , the caesarean section ratio was found to be 43.06 % for the 281 deliveries diagnosed with non-reactive NST.Conclusion: Increased ratio of primary caesarean section in patients diagnosed with non-reactive NST has been displayed in our study.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Non stress test · reaktivite · Non-stress test

Abstract

Aim: The aim is to evaluate the perinatal and obstetric results of the pregnant women admitted with the diagnosis of non-reactive NST.Material and methods: 405 women with pregnancies of 36 weeks and over, visiting our antenatal clinic during May 2011 – May 2012, and being admitted to the Delivery Unit with non-reactive NST pre-diagnosis were evaluated in a retrospective study. High risk pregnancies were excluded. The mode of delivery and perinatal results were compared total of 14,650 patients admitted to the Delivery Unit in one year.Results: It was determined that of the 14,650 patients admitted to the Delivery Unit, 405 2.76 % were admitted due presumptive to non-reactive NST pre-diagnosis. While the number of primary caesarean sections was 2,669 19.98 % , the caesarean section ratio was found to be 43.06 % for the 281 deliveries diagnosed with non-reactive NST.Conclusion: Increased ratio of primary caesarean section in patients diagnosed with non-reactive NST has been displayed in our study.

Özet

Amaç: Non-reaktif NST ön tanıyla yatırılan gebelerin perinatal ve obstetrik sonuçlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereçler ve Yöntem: 2011 Mayıs ve 2012 Mayıs tarihleri arasında hastanemiz antenatal kliniğine başvuran ve nonreaktif NST ön tanısıyla Doğum Ünitesine yatırılan 36. hafta ve üzeri 405 gebe retrospektif olarak incelendi. Yüksek riskli gebeler çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Bu hastaların doğum şekli ve perinatal sonuçları bir yıl içerisinde doğum ünitesine yatırılan toplam 14650 hastanın sonuçları ile karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Doğum Ünitesi'ne yatan 14650 hastanın 405'inin %2,76 non reaktif NST ön tanısıyla yatırıldığı tespit edildi. Primer sezaryen sayısı 2669 %19,98 iken nonreaktif NST tanısı alıp doğurtulan 281 gebede primer sezaryen oranı %43,06 olarak tespit edildi.Sonuç: Nonreaktif NST tespit edilen hastalarda primer sezaryen oranları artışı belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

Aktulay, A., Üstün, Y. E., Eyi, E. G. Y., Yörük, Ö., Hançerlioğulları, N., Mollamahmutoğlu, L. (2013). Evaluation Of Non-Reactive Nst At Low Risk Pregnancy. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 37, 1542–1545. https://ajindex.com/articles/1420506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hoh JK, Park MI, Park YS, Koh SK. The significance of amplitude and duration of fetal heart rate acceleration in non-stress test analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012;51(3):397-401.
  2. Ocak V, Sen C, Demirkiran F, Colgar U, Oçer F, Kilavuz O. FHR monitoring and perinatal mortality in high-risk pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44(1):59-63.
  3. Ocak V, Demirkíran F, Sen C, Colgar U, Oçer F, Kilavuz O, Uras Y. The predictive value of fetal heart rate monitoring: a retrospective analysis of 2165 high-risk pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44(1):53-8.
  4. Park YS, Koh SK, Hoh JK, Park MI. Difference of fetal heart rate accelerations based on 10 and 15 beats per minute. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010;36(2):291-5
  5. Monica P. Practice Guidelines ACOG Guidelines on Antepartum Fetal Surveillance Am Fam Physician 2000;62:1184-1188.
  6. Devoe LD. Antenatal fetal assessment: contraction stress test, nonstress test, vibroacoustic stimulation, amniotic fluid volume, biophysical profile, and modified biophysical profile--an overview. Semin Perinatol 2008;32(4):247-52.
  7. Evertson LR, Gauthier RJ, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133:29.
  8. Devoe LD, Jones CR. Nonstress test: evidence-based use in high-risk pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;45(4):986-92.
  9. Tonguç E, Moraloğlu Ö, Var T, Engin-Üstün YAntepartum fetal tests. J Gynecol-Obstet Neonatal 2009;6:953-957
  10. Bartnicki J, Ratanasiri T, Meyenburg M, Saling E. Effect of the vibratory acoustic stimulation on fetal heart rate patterns of premature fetuses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992;37(1):3-6.
  11. Ohel G, Birkenfeld A, Rabinowitz R, Sadovsky E. Fetal response to vibratory acoustic stimulation in periods of low heart rate reactivity and low activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154(3):619-21.
  12. Goonewardene M, Hanwellage K. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring. Ceylon Med J 2011;56(1):14-8.
  13. Hasanpour S, Raouf S, Shamsalizadeh N, Bani S, Ghojazadeh M, Sheikhan F. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013 Jan 18. [Epub ahead of print]