SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

The Effect Of Salphingectomy On Ovarian Function Via Laparotomy Vs Laparoscopy In Patients With Ectopic Pregnancy

Ektopik Gebelikte Salpenjektominin Laparatomik veya Laparoskopik Yöntemle Yapılmasının Over Fonksiyonu Üzerine Etkisi

Arzu Kublay(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Hüseyin Kıyak(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Pınar Kadıroğulları(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Burak Yücel(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Kerem Doğa Seçkin(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Ali Gedikbaşı(İstanbul Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Obstetrik ve Jinekoloji Departmanı, İstanbul/TÜRKİYE)
Pages
70–74
Publication Date
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, there is no statistical significant difference between two groups in the manner of antral follicle counts of the ovaries, ovarian volume and ovarian stromal blood flow at the non operated side.Conclusion: When our study is analyzed, there is no statistical significant difference between the laparoscopic and laparotomic salpingectomy tecniques in the manner of changes of ovarian function tests after the surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the changes of ovarian function in patients underwent laparoscopic or laparotomic salpingectomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.Material and Methods: In this prospective study, the changes of ovarian function in patients administrated to our hospital within the period of March 2013 to June 2015 with ectopic pregnancy treated by laparoscopic and laparotomic salpingectomy tecniques were observed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On 2-4. day of menstruation the antral follicle counts, ovarian volumes and ovarian stromal blood flow characteristics including Peak Systolic Velocity, End Diastolic Velocity, Resistance Index and Systolic/Diastolic ratio in both ovaries of the patients were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound by a single person in gynecology outpatient clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, there is no statistical significant difference between two groups in the manner of antral follicle counts of the ovaries, ovarian volume and ovarian stromal blood flow at the non operated side.Conclusion: When our study is analyzed, there is no statistical significant difference between the laparoscopic and laparotomic salpingectomy tecniques in the manner of changes of ovarian function tests after the surgery.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ektopik gebelik · laparoskopi · laparotomi

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the changes of ovarian function in patients underwent laparoscopic or laparotomic salpingectomy for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.Material and Methods: In this prospective study, the changes of ovarian function in patients administrated to our hospital within the period of March 2013 to June 2015 with ectopic pregnancy treated by laparoscopic and laparotomic salpingectomy tecniques were observed. On 2-4. day of menstruation the antral follicle counts, ovarian volumes and ovarian stromal blood flow characteristics including Peak Systolic Velocity, End Diastolic Velocity, Resistance Index and Systolic/Diastolic ratio in both ovaries of the patients were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound by a single person in gynecology outpatient clinic. All these patients met the following criteria: unilateral salpingectomy at least 3 months ago, no history of ovarian or other tubal surgery, no extensive pelvic adhesion found during the operation, no ovarian cyst on pelvic ultrasound scan examinations, and no hormonal treatment for the preceding 3 months.Patients were divided into two groups examining laparotomic and laparoscopic tecniques. This study was included 32 patients with ectopic pregnancy treated by laparoscopic salpingectomy and 25 patients with ectopic pregnancy treated by laparotomic salpingectomy. For all patients included in this study, demographic data, obstetric history and the measurements of ovaries were recorded.Results: Demographic features of the patients in both groups were similar. There is no statistical significant difference between two groups in the manner of antral follicle counts of the ovaries, ovarian volume and ovarian stromal blood flow at the operated side. Similarly, there is no statistical significant difference between two groups in the manner of antral follicle counts of the ovaries, ovarian volume and ovarian stromal blood flow at the non operated side.Conclusion: When our study is analyzed, there is no statistical significant difference between the laparoscopic and laparotomic salpingectomy tecniques in the manner of changes of ovarian function tests after the surgery.

Özet

Giriş: Ektopik gebelik nedeniyle salpenjektomi olan hastalarda operasyonun laparotomik veya laparoskopik teknikle yapılmasının over fonksiyon testleri üzerine etkisinin olup olmadığının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Prospektif dizayn ile tasarlanmış olan çalışmamızda, ektopik gebelik nedeniyle salpenjektomi olan hastaların over fonksiyon testlerini incelemek amacıyla, jinekoloji polikliniğinde adetlerinin 2-4. günü arasında tek kişi tarafından ultrasound yapılarak hastaların opere olan ve olmayan taraftaki overlerine bakılmıştır. Her iki overdeki antral folliküller sayılmış, her iki overin volümleri ölçülmüş, her iki overin stromal kan akımları Doppler ultrasonografi uygulanarak Peak Sistolik Velosite PSV , End Diyastolik Velosite EDV , Rezistans Index RI ve Sistolik/Diyastolik S/D oranları ölçülmüştür. En az 3 ay önce unilateral salpenjektomi operasyonu geçiren, daha önce over veya tubal bir cerrahi geçirmemiş olan, ameliyatında yaygın pelvik yapışıklık olmayan, ultrasonografide kist izlenmeyen ve son 3 aydır hormonal tedavi almayan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastalar laparotomik ve laparoskopik cerrahi yöntemlerinin değerlendirildiği iki grupta incelenmiştir. Gruplar 32 olgunun incelendiği laparoskopik yaklaşımla salpenjektomi ve 25 olgunun incelendiği laparotomik yaklaşımla salpenjektomi grubu olarak oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm hastaların demografik verileri, obstetrik öyküleri ve overlerin ultrasonografik ölçümleri kaydedilmiştir.Bulgular: Her iki gruptaki hastaların demografik özellikleri birbirine benzer saptandı. Her iki grup arasında opere olan taraftaki overlerin antral follikül sayıları, overlerin volümleri ve overlerin stromal kan akımları açısından istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı fark izlenmedi. Aynı şekilde her iki grup arasında opere olmayan taraftaki overlerin follikül sayıları, overlerin volümleri ve overlerin stromal kan akımları açısından istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı fark izlenmedi.Sonuç: Çalışmamız incelendiğinde, laparoskopi veya laparotomi ile salpenjektomi yöntemlerinde cerrahi uygulama sonrası her iki overin fonksiyonlarının etkilenmesi açısından, teknik yaklaşım olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kublay, A., Kıyak, H., Kadıroğulları, P., Yücel, B., Seçkin, K. D., Gedikbaşı, A. (2018). The Effect Of Salphingectomy On Ovarian Function Via Laparotomy Vs Laparoscopy In Patients With Ectopic Pregnancy. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 70–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/1420248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Lipscomb GH. Ectopic Pregnancy; Copeland LJ Textbook of Gynecology 2nd Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, 2000; 273-283.
  2. Murray H, Baakdah H, Bardell T, Tulandi T. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ 2005; 173(8): 905.
  3. National Center for Health Statistics. Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces and deaths: United States, 1989. Hyattsville, MD: US. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, 1990; 38(13): 23.
  4. Pulkkinen MO, Talo A. Tubal physiologic consideration in ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1987: 30: 164-172.
  5. Atri M, Bret PM, Tulandi T. Spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy appearance and evolution at transvaginal US. Radiology 1993; 186: 83- 86.
  6. Diamond M.P. Surgical techniques for the management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 30: 411-412.
  7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) (1999). Guideline No. 21. The Management of Tubal Pregnancy. London, RCOG Press.
  8. Vermesh M, Silva PD. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 400-404.
  9. Akhan SE, Baysal B. Laparotomy or Laparoscopic surgery? Factors affecting the surgeons choice for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002; 266: 79-82.
  10. Thornton KL, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH. Linear salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991; 81: 95-109.
  11. Ego A, Subtil D, Cosson M, Legoueff FO, Houfflin-Debarge VR, Querleu D, Survival analysis of fertility after ectopic pregnancy, Fertility and Sterility, 75 (3), 2001.
  12. Syrop CH, Willhoite A, Van Voorhis BJ. (1995) Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil. Steril. 64, 1167-1171.
  13. Syrop CH, Dawson JD, Husman KJ, Sparks AE and Van Voorhis BJ. (1999) Ovarian volume may predict assisted reproductive outcomes better than follicle stimulating hormone concentration on day 3. Hum. Reprod. 14, 1752-1756.
  14. Tomaas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S and Martikainen H. (1997) Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 12, 220-223.
  15. Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S and Tan SL. (1996) Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at the baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular response in an in vitro fertilization program. Obstet. Gynecol. 88, 779-784.
  16. Kupesic S and Kurjak A. (2002) Predictors of IVF outcome by three dimensional ultrasound. Hum. Reprod. 17, 950-955.
  17. Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Bjelos D and Vujisic S. (2003) Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. Fertil. Steril. 79, 190-197
  18. Chan CCW, Ng EHY, Li CF and Ho PC. Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Human Reproduction Vol.18, No.10 pp. 2175-2180, 2003
  19. Anna G, Grynnerup A, Lindhard A, Sørensen S. Anti-M€ullerian hormone levels in salpingectomized compared with nonsalpingectomized women with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility. 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 92 (2013) 1297–1303
  20. Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT and Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: Effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. Vol. 33, No. 6: 863–869
  21. Venturelle R, Morelli M, Lico D, Cello AD et al. Wide excision of soft tissues adjacent to the ovary and fallopian tube does not impair the ovarian reserve in women undergoing prophylactic bilateral slpingectomy: results from a randomized, controlled trial, Fertility and Sterility, 2015, Vol. 104, No.5.
  22. Ye X, Yang Y, Sun X. A retrospective analysis of the effect of salpingectomy on serum antiMüllerian hormone level and ovarian reserve, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015; 212: 53. e1
  23. Nakagawa K, Ohgi S, Nakashima A, Horikawa T, Irahara M and Saito H. Laparoscopic proximal tubal division can preserve ovarian reserve for infertility patients with hydrosalpinges. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. Vol. 34, No. 6: 1037–1042
  24. Atilgan R, Kuloglu T, Boztosun A, Orak U, Baspinar M. Investigation of the effects of unilateral total salpingectomy on ovarian proliferating cell nuclear antigen and follicular reserve: experimental study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015; 188: 56-60.
  25. Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 294-297
  26. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J, Andreoni C, Humphrey PA, Collyer W, et al. Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular staples and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model, Journal of Urology, 2003; Vol. 169, 697-700.
  27. Goldstein SL, Harold KL, Lentzner A, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF et al. Comparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the Laparo-Sonic ultrasonic shears and the Ligasure system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12: 61-63.
  28. Richter S, Kollmar O, Neunhoeffer E, Schilling MK, Menger MD, Pistorius G. Differential Response of Arteries and Veins to Bipolar Vessel Sealing: Evaluation of a Novel Reusable Device. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Vol 16, 2006.
  29. Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT and Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: Effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. Vol. 33, No. 6: 863–869