Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 7

Urban aerosol assessment and forecast: Coimbra case study

Pages
1155–1164
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Spatial distribution of PM10 concentrations highlights the limitations to characterize urban hot spots based on the measurements from only one traffic station available within the study area and used to validate the urban scale model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to explore the existing services at a regional scale and study their applicability to the assessment and forecast of air quality at the urban scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The local contribution from road traffic was analysed using transportation (VISUM) -emission (QTraffic) - dispersion (ADMS-Roads) modelling chain with 10 m grid resolution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Spatial distribution of PM10 concentrations highlights the limitations to characterize urban hot spots based on the measurements from only one traffic station available within the study area and used to validate the urban scale model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The objective of this study is to explore the existing services at a regional scale and study their applicability to the assessment and forecast of air quality at the urban scale. Two approaches were evaluated to characterize urban background pollution levels from the regional operational forecast: (i) Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) and (ii) Chemical Transport Model CHIMERE from the national forecast system. The local contribution from road traffic was analysed using transportation (VISUM) -emission (QTraffic) - dispersion (ADMS-Roads) modelling chain with 10 m grid resolution. The methodology was applied to Coimbra city to estimate PM10 concentrations for the period of one year (2018). In order to validate the model outputs against the daily observations, the FAIRMODE Delta Tool was applied separately for regional and urban scale. The results obtained for Coimbra satisfy the modelling performance criteria. However, both approaches used to characterize background concentrations underestimate PM10 levels. The modelling bias at urban traffic station is about 6 μg m−3 for annual mean concentration. Local highest contribution of road traffic to PM10 annual mean obtained with high grid resolution (10 m) achieves 22 μg m−3 . Spatial distribution of PM10 concentrations highlights the limitations to characterize urban hot spots based on the measurements from only one traffic station available within the study area and used to validate the urban scale model.

🔖

Cite This Article

TCHEPEL, O., MONTEIRO, A., DIAS, D., GAMA, C., PINA, N., RODRIGUES, J., FERREIRA, M., MIRANDAB, A. (2020). Urban aerosol assessment and forecast: Coimbra case study. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 7, 1155–1164. https://ajindex.com/articles/141873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. APA, 2017. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente - Emissões de Poluentes Atmosféricos por Concelho 2015: Gases acidificantes e eutrofizantes, precursores de ozono, partículas, metais pesados, poluentes orgânicos persistentes e gases com efeito de estufa. Anexo Emissões por concelho em 2015. (Excel format). APA (Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente), 2018. Transporte de partículas e poeiras naturais com origem em regiões áridas dos desertos do Norte de África. Available at: http:// apambiente.pt/index.php?ref=16&subref=82&sub2ref=316&sub3ref=941. Bai, L., Wang, J., Ma, X., Lu, H., 2018. Air pollution forecasts: an overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 15 (4), 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040780.
  2. Carruthers, D.J., Holroyd, R.J., Hunt, J.C.R., Weng, W.S., Robins, A.G., Apsley, D.D., Thomson, D.J., Smith, F.B., 1994. UK-ADMS: a new approach to modelling dispersion in the earth's atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 52, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90044-2. CERC, 2017. ADMS-Roads User guide. Available at: https://www.cerc.co.uk/ environmental-software/assets/data/doc_userguides/CERC_ADMS-Roads4.1.1_User_ Guide.pdf Version 4.1. Chahine, T., Baccarelli, A., Litonjua, A., Wright, R.O., Suh, H., Gold, D.R., Sparrow, D., Vokonas, P., Schwartz, J., 2007. Particulate air pollution, oxidative stress genes, and heart rate variability in an elderly cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10318. CAMS, 2016.
  3. Regional Production, Description of the Operational Models and of the Ensemble System. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Report. Meteo-France. Ref.: CAMS_50_2015SC1_Models_Factsheets_201610_vol. 2. CAMS, 2018. CAMS95e_CERC – airTEXT Air Quality Forecasting Service for Riga. Ref.: CAMS95e_2017SC1_D95e.1.1.1_201710_PublicFinalReport_v2. (Issued by CERC/ Amy Stidworthy). Dias, D., Antunes, A.P., Tchepel, O., 2019. Modelling of emissions and Energy use from biofuel fuelled vehicles at urban scale. Sustainability 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11102902. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2018. Air quality in Europe - 2018 report. EEA Report No 12/2018. EMEP/EEA, 2016. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2016. Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories EEA Report, No 21/ 2016.
  4. Han, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Zhang, X., Tian, Y., Wang, J., Ding, J., Yan, W., Bi, X., Shi, G., Cai, Z., Yao, Q., Huang, H., Feng, Y., 2015. Evaluation of regional background particulate matt