SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Factors affecting treatment compliance in patients with substance use disorder under probation

Hanife YILMAZ ÇENGEL
S. Utku UZUN
Müge BOZKURT
E. Cüneyt EVREN
Pages
373–379
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results emphasized the importance of including the family in the treatment program, evaluating craving at each session and providing pharmacological or psychotherapeutic support for craving.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective:The present study aims to determine the factors that affectingthe treatment compliance in patients with substance use disorder (SUD) under probation in terms of sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, addiction severity, perceived family support, treatment motivation and impulsiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:In this study, 93substance use disorder patients who were taken three-month outpatient treatment program were included consecu-tively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results emphasized the importance of including the family in the treatment program, evaluating craving at each session and providing pharmacological or psychotherapeutic support for craving.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective:The present study aims to determine the factors that affectingthe treatment compliance in patients with substance use disorder (SUD) under probation in terms of sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, addiction severity, perceived family support, treatment motivation and impulsiveness. Methods:In this study, 93substance use disorder patients who were taken three-month outpatient treatment program were included consecu-tively. Sociodemographic Data Form, Addiction Profile Index (API), Perceived Social Support from Family Scale (PSS-Fa), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale and Treatment Motivation Questionnaire were applied to patients before the treatment program. Results:At the end of three months follow-up period 55 (59.1%) of the 93 patients were treatment-incompatible while 38 (40.9%) were treatment-compatible.When the tests results are examined; the craving subscale score of API had significantly higher and the PSS-Fa scores had significantly lower in the treat-ment-incompatible group than the treatment-compatible group. Conclusion:In our study, craving and low per-ceived family support were found to be factors affecting treatment compliance in patients with SUD on probation. These results emphasized the importance of including the family in the treatment program, evaluating craving at each session and providing pharmacological or psychotherapeutic support for craving.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇENGEL, H. Y., UZUN, S. U., BOZKURT, M., EVREN, E. C. (2020). Factors affecting treatment compliance in patients with substance use disorder under probation. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 373–379. https://ajindex.com/articles/141781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A, Minton T. Correcti-onal Populations in the United States, 2014. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2016; 1-19
  2. Bilici R, Ögel K, Bahadır GG, Maçkan A, Orhan N, Tuna O. Treatment outcomes of drug users in probation period: three months follow-up. Psychi-atry Clin Psychopharmacol 2018; 28(2):149-155
  3. Turan R, Yargic I. The relationship between sub-stance abusetreatment completion, sociodemog-raphics, substance use characteristics, and crimi-nal history. Subst Abus 2012; 33(2):92-98
  4. Mackensen G, Cottone RR. Family structural issues and chemical dependency: A review of the literature from 1985 to 1991. Am J Fam Ther 1992; 20(3):227–241
  5. Conner BT, Longshore D, Anglin MD. Modeling attitude towards drug treament: the role of internal motivation, external pressure, and dramatic relief. J Behav Health Serv 2009; 36(2):150-158
  6. Evren C, Saatçioğlu Ö, Dalbudak E, Danışmant BS, Çakmak D, Ryan RM. Factorial structure and reliability and validity of Turkish version treatment motivation questionnaire (TMQ) in alcohol depen-dents. J Depend 2006; 90(216):117-122
  7. Cuomo C, Sarchiapone M, Giannantonio M Di, Mancini M, Roy A. Aggression, impulsivity, per-sonality traits, and childhood trauma of prisoners with substance abuse and addiction. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2008; 34(3):339-345
  8. Lane SD, Cherek DR, Rhoades HM, Pietras CJ, Tcheremissine OV. Relationships among labora-tory and psychometric measures of impulsivity: implications in substance abuse and dependence. Addict Disord Their Treat 2003; 2(2):33-40
  9. Patkar AA, Murray HW, Mannelli P, Gottheil E, Weinstein SP, Vergare MJ. Pre-treatment mea-sures of impulsivity, aggression and sensation seeking are associated with treatment outcome for African-American cocaine-dependent patients. J Addict Dis 2004; 23(2):109-122
  10. Berkowitz L. Is criminal violence normative behav-ior? J Res CrimeDelinq 1978; 15(2):148-161
  11. Ogel K, Bilici R, Guvenc Bahadir G, Mackan A, Orhan N, Tuna O. The effectiveness of the tobac-co, alcohol and drug dependence treatment pro-gram (SAMBA) on drug users in probation. Ana-tolian Journal of Psychiatry 2016; 17(4):270-277
  12. Ogel K, Evren C, Karadağ F, Tamar Gürol D. Bağımlılık Profil İndeksi’nin (BAPİ) geliştirilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatr Derg 2012; 23(4):264-273
  13. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol 1983; 11(1):1-24. 1