Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Fragile Five Countries

Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Kırılgan Beşli Ülkeleri Üzerindeki Makro Ekonomik Etkileri

Erdem Turgan(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9912-6521
Pages
153–165
Publication Date
2022-04-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The regression results indicate that a 1% rise in FDI stock increases exports by 0.06% where a 1% rise in imports increases exports by 0.81%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effects of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the export and gross domestic product (GDP) in the original fragile five countries for the period 1990-2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The regression results indicate that a 1% rise in FDI stock increases exports by 0.06% where a 1% rise in imports increases exports by 0.81%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The causality test results show that there is a bidirectional relationship between FDI and Imports and GDP, unidirectional relationship from FDI to exports, and bidirectional relationship between GDP and exports.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım · İhracat · Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of foreign direct investments (FDI) on the export and gross domestic product (GDP) in the original fragile five countries for the period 1990-2017. For the sake of the analysis, annual data is used and two econometric models are utilized to determine the stationary of variables, their long-term relationship, regression coefficients, and causality relationship between variables. The regression results indicate that a 1% rise in FDI stock increases exports by 0.06% where a 1% rise in imports increases exports by 0.81%. On the other hand, a 1% growth in FDI increases GDP by 0.12% where a 1% rise in exports, increase GDP by 0.79%. The causality test results show that there is a bidirectional relationship between FDI and Imports and GDP, unidirectional relationship from FDI to exports, and bidirectional relationship between GDP and exports.

Özet

Bu çalışma orjinal kırılgan beşli ülkeleri olan Türkiye, Brezilya, Hindistan, Endonezya ve Güney Afrika'da doğrudan yabancı yatırımların, ihracat ve gayri safi yurtiçi hasılaya olan etkileri, 1990-2017 dönemi yıllık verileri kullanılarak, iki farklı ekonometrik model yardımıyla, panel veri analiziyle incelenmiştir. Regresyon sonuçlarına göre doğrudan yabancı yatırım stoku %1 arttığında ortalama %0.06, ithalat %1 arttığında ortalama %0.81 oranında, GSYH’nin ise; doğrudan yabancı yatırım stoku %1 arttığında ortalama %0.12, ihracat %1 arttığında ise ortalama %0.79 oranında artmış olduğu belirlenmiştir. Nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile gayri safi yurtiçi hasıla ve ithalat arasında çift yönlü, doğrudan yabancı yatırımdan ihracata doğru tek yönlü, gayri safi yurtiçi hasıla ile ihracat arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkileri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baykal, M. M., Turgan, E. (2022). Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Fragile Five Countries. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.766173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. BARBIERI, L. (2006). Panel Unit Root Tests: A Review. Serie Rossa: Economia – Quaderno No: 43.
  2. COSTANTINI, M. (2010). Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Methods. https://homepage.univie.ac.at/mauro.costantini/master_class_2010.pdf
  3. LOPEZ, L. & WEBER, S. (2017). Testing for Granger Causality in Panel Data. The University of Neuchatel, Institute of Economic Research, IRENE Working Paper No: 17-03., 2-4
  4. PEDRONI, P. (2000). Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.294.1320&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  5. PESARAN, M. H. (2003). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence.
  6. TARI, R. (2012). Econometrics. (8. Edition), Umuttepe Publications, Kocaeli.
  7. UNCTAD (2018). Foreign direct investment: Inward and outward flows and stock, annual, http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/downloadPrompt.aspx
  8. ÜNSAR, S. (2007). Production Strategies in International Business. Journal of Yasar University, 2(7), 695-708.
  9. WHELAN, K. (2011). MA Advanced Econometrics: Spurious Regressions and Cointegration. http://www.karlwhelan.com/Teaching/MA%20Econometrics/part4.pdf
  10. WORLD BANK (2018a). Exports of goods and services (current US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.CD?view=chart
  11. WORLD BANK (2018b). Imports of goods and services (current US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.CD?view=chart
  12. WORLD BANK (2018c). GDP (current US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD