SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Gerontechnology: Technological Solutions for Sustainable Long-Term Care

Geronteknoloji: Sürdürülebilir Uzun Dönem Bakım için Teknolojik Çözümler

Barış Kılıç(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES)0000-0002-0969-0736
Nisa Yıldız(OSMANIYE KORKUT ATA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES)0000-0003-2896-3979
Lutfiye İpek0000-0002-9070-0814
Süheyla Sönmez0000-0002-9313-0837
Meliha Güçlü Saz0000-0002-3650-4644
Ahmet Aytepe(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1032-0513
Gülüşan Özgün Başıbüyük(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES)
Pages
387–401
Publication Date
2025-04-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, gerontechnology has the potential to support older adults' independence and improve their quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid demographic aging brings with it various challenges in areas such as health, care, safety, isolation and disability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Finding solutions to this situation requires political, economic and social planning to ensure sustainability and support the well-being and quality of long term care.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, gerontechnology has the potential to support older adults' independence and improve their quality of life.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gerontoloji · teknoloji · yaşlanma

Abstract

The rapid demographic aging brings with it various challenges in areas such as health, care, safety, isolation and disability. Finding solutions to this situation requires political, economic and social planning to ensure sustainability and support the well-being and quality of long term care. In the contemporary context, gerontechnological solutions are emerging as important tools for solving the social problems of rapid aging. Gerontechnology combines technology, design and gerontology, aiming to design technologies and environments that provide comfort and safety for older adults. The aim of this article is to discuss the development of gerontechnology and the opportunities it offers for ensuring the sustainability of long-term care. Methodologically, this study is a review study. The article begins by providing a comprehensive overview of the emergence and evolution of the concept of gerontechnology, which has led to a contemporary critical transformation in academia. Then, starting from the concept of digital transformation within the scope of gerontechnology, the article presents a detailed examination of older adults' attitudes towards gerontechnological products. In conclusion, gerontechnology has the potential to support older adults' independence and improve their quality of life.

Özet

Demografik yaşlanmanın hızla gerçekleşmesi sağlık, bakım, güvenlik, izolasyon, engellilik gibi alanlarda çeşitli zorlukları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu duruma çözüm bulmak, sürdürülebilirliği sağlamak, yaşlıların refahını ve bakım kalitesini desteklemek için politik, ekonomik ve sosyal planlamayı gerektirmektedir. Çağdaş bağlamda geronteknolojik çözümler, hızlı yaşlanmanın getirdiği toplumsal sorunların çözümünde önemli araçlar olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Geronteknoloji, yaşlı yetişkinler için konfor ve güvenlik sağlayacak teknolojiler ve ortamlar tasarlamayı amaçlayarak teknoloji, tasarım ve gerontolojiyi birleştirmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı geronteknoloji bilimin gelişimini ve uzun dönem bakımın sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanması açısından sunduğu imkanları tartışmaktır. Yöntem olarak bu çalışma bir derleme çalışması niteliğindedir. Bu makale, akademide çağdaş eleştirel dönüşüme yol açan geronteknoloji kavramının ortaya çıkışı ve evrimine kapsamlı bir genel bakış sunarak başlamaktadır. Daha sonra geronteknoloji kapsamında dijital dönüşüm kavramından yola çıkarak yaşlı yetişkinlerin geronteknolojik ürünlere yönelik tutumları dikkate alınarak makale ayrıntılı bir inceleme sunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak geronteknoloji yaşlı yetişkinlerin bağımsızlığını destekleme ve yaşam kalitesini iyileştirme potansiyeline sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılıç, B., Yıldız, N., İpek, L., Sönmez, S., Saz, M. G., Aytepe, A., Başıbüyük, G. Ö. (2025). Gerontechnology: Technological Solutions for Sustainable Long-Term Care. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1429059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (80)

  1. ALDRICH, F. (2003). Smart Homes: Past, Present and Future. In R. Harper (Ed.), Inside the Smart Home (pp. 17-36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-85233-854-7_2
  2. ALEXOPOULOS, K., NIKOLAKIS, N.& XANTHAKIS, E. (2022). Digital Transformation of Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Smes-the Mold Shop Case. Applied Sciences, 21(12), 10788. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110788.
  3. AVCI, İ. A. (2022). Akıllı Evlerde Iot Teknolojileri ve Siber Güvenlik. European Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1080228
  4. BARRETT, P., HALE, B., & GAULD, R. (2012). Social inclusion through ageing-in place with care? Ageing and Society, 32(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000341
  5. BOUMA, H., FOZARD, J. L., BOUWHUIS, D. G., & Taipale, V. (2009). Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology, 6(4), 190–216. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2007.06.04.003.00
  6. CHEN, K., & CHAN, A. H. (2014). Predictors of gerontechnology acceptance by older Hong Kong Chinese. Technovation, 34(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.010
  7. CHEN, L. K. (2020). Gerontechnology and artificial intelligence: better care for older people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 91, 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104252
  8. CHU, C. H., RONQUILLO, C., KHAN, S., HUNG, L., & BOSCART, V. (2021). Technology Recommendations to Support Person-Centered Care in Long-Term Care Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 33(4–5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2021.1927620
  9. COHEN, C., KAMPEL, T., VERLOO, H. (2017). Acceptability of an intelligent wireless sensor system for the rapid detection of health issues: findings among home-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers. Patient Prefer Adher 10:1687–1695. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S113805
  10. CREBER, R., HICKEY, K., MAURER, M. (2016). Gerontechnologies For Older Patients With Heart Failure: What Is the Role Of Smartphones, Tablets, And Remote Monitoring Devices In Improving Symptom Monitoring And Self-care Management?. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-016-0511-8
  11. CZAJA, S. J., CHARNESS, N., FISK, A. D., HERTZOG, C., NAIR, S. N., ROGERS, W. A., & SHARIT, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and aging, 21(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
  12. DANN, T. (2014). Global elderly care in crisis. The Lancet, 383(9921), 927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60463-3
  13. DELBREIL, E., ZVOBGO, G. (2013). Wireless sensor technology in dementia care: caregiver perceptions, technology take-up and business model innovation. EuroMed J Bus 8(1):79–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-05-2013-0019
  14. EKICI, S. K., & GÜMÜŞ, Z. (2016). Yaşlılıkta teknolojinin kullanımı. Ege Tıp Dergisi, 55(0). https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.344199
  15. ESENDEMIR, Ş. (2016). Türkiye'de Yerinde Yaşlanma ve Mekan Gerontolojisinin Temel Paremetreleri. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 36 (2), 411-429. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusosyoloji/issue/35801/401020
  16. FOZARD, J. L., RIETSEMA, J., BOUMA, H., GRAAFMANS, J. A. M. (2000). Gerontechnology: Creatıng Enablıng Environments For The Challenges And Opportunities Of Agıng. Educational Gerontology, 26(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/036012700407820
  17. GALLISTL, V., KATZ, S., KOLLAND, F., & PEINE, A. (2023). Socio-gerontechnology—New perspectives on the digital transformation of later life. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1183572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1183572
  18. GÖKÇAKAN, K. (2019). Yaşlıların Mekâna Dair Sorunları ve Akıllı Ev Teknolojileri ile Olan İlişkileri (publication No. 579404) [Master's dissertation, Anadolu University]. Council Of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  19. GRAAFMANS, J. A. M., & BOUMA, H. (1993). Gerontechnology®, Fitting Task and Environment to the Elderly. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 37(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129303700205
  20. GREVE, B. (2017). Long-term care – What Is It About. In B. Greve (Ed.), Long-term Care for the Elderly in Europe Development and Prospects (pp. 1-7). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592947
  21. HALICKA, K., SUREL, D. (2021). Gerontechnology-new opportunities in the service of older adults. Eng Manag Prod Serv 13(3):114–126. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0025
  22. HAUFE, M., PEEK, S. T. M., & LUIJKX, K. G. (2019). Matching gerontechnologies to independent-living seniors’ individual needs: development of the GTM tool. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3848-5
  23. HAVIGHURST, R. J., & Albrecht, R. (1953). Older people. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  24. HSU, Y. (2015). Smart Technology For the Older Adults To Facilitate Independent Living And Social Participation. International Journal Of Automation And Smart Technology, 5(4), 195-196. https://doi.org/10.5875/ausmt.v5i4.1064
  25. HUANG, G., & OTENG, S. A. (2023). Gerontechnology for better elderly care and life quality: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Ageing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-023-00776-9
  26. HUANG, H., CHEN, Z., CAO, S., XIAO, M., XIE, L., & ZHAO, Q. (2021). Adoption Intention and Factors Influencing the Use of Gerontechnology in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.687048
  27. JASCHINSKI, C., BEN ALLOUCH, S., PETERS, O., CACHUCHO, R., & VAN DIJK, J. A. G. M. (2021). Acceptance of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Conceptual Model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e22613. https://doi.org/10.2196/22613
  28. JNR, B. (2020). Managing Digital Transformation of Smart Cities Through Enterprise Architecture – a Review and Research Agenda. Enterprise Information Systems, 3(15), 299-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1812006
  29. KALINKARA, V., & ARPACI, F. (2013, May 23-25). Yerinde Yaşlanma [Conference presentation]. VII. Ulusal Yaşlılık Kongresi.
  30. KALINKARA, V., BAŞIBÜYÜK, G. Ö. & Ay, F. (2016). Yaşlıların Geronteknolojik Ürünleri Kabule Yönelik Tutumları. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 9 (2), 1-19. KALINKARA, V., BAŞIBÜYÜK, G. Ö., & AY, F. (2024). The factors affecting acceptance of gerontechnological products by older Turkish adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 117, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.105198
  31. KIM, H., KELLY, S., LAFORTUNE, L., & BRAYNE, C. (2021). A Scoping Review Of the Conceptual Differentiation Of Technology For Healthy Aging. The Gerontologist, 61(7), e345-e369. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051
  32. KIM, K. I., GOLLAMUDI, S. S., & STEINHUBL, S. (2017). Digital technology to enable aging in place. Experimental gerontology, 88, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.11.013
  33. KOWALSKI, S. J., & ØSTBY, G. (2022). A Socio-Technical Regime Transitions Model for Gerontechnology Service Design: Privacy, Information Security and Cyber Security in Focus. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti220959
  34. LAIDLAW, K., THOMPSON, L. W., DICK-SISKIN, L. and GALLAGHER-THOMPSON, D. (2003). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy with Older People. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  35. LANDORF, C., BREWER, G., & SHEPPARD, L. A. (2008). The urban environment and sustainable ageing: Critical issues and assessment indicators. Local Environment, 13(6), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802259896
  36. LEBRON, J., ESCALANTE, K., COPPOLA, J., GAUR, C. (2015). Activity tracker technologies for older adults: Successful adoption via intergenerational telehealth. In: 2015 IEEE long island systems, applications and technology conference, LISAT 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ LISAT.2015.7160200
  37. LEE, L. N., & KIM, M. J. (2020). A critical review of smart residential environments for older adults with a focus on pleasurable experience. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 3080. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03080.
  38. LIPP, B., & PEINE, A. (2022). Ageing as a driver of progressive politics? What the European Silver Economy teaches us about the co-constitution of ageing and innovation. Ageing and Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x22000903
  39. MANNHEIM, I., WOUTERS, E. J., KÖTTL, H., VAN BOEKEL, L. C., BRANKAERT, R., & VAN ZAALEN, Y. (2023). Ageism in the discourse and practice of designing digital technology for older persons: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, 63(7), 1188-1200. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac144
  40. MARTIN, P., Kelly, N., Kahana, B., Kahana, E., Willcox, B. J., Willcox, D. C., & Poon, L. W. (2015). Defining successful aging: a tangible or elusive concept?. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu044
  41. MARTIN-GARCIA, A. V., MURCIANO-HUESO, A., TORRIJOS-FINCIAS, P. & GUTIÉRREZ-PÉREZ, B. M. (2021), “Digital identity and quality of life technologies in the older adults”, Identity in a Hyperconnected Society, Springer, pp. 167-183, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85788-2_12
  42. MERTENS, M., & De Maesschalck, L. (2015). Types of sensor technologies: functionalities and measurements. In J. V. HOOF, G. DEMIRIS, E. J. M. WOUTERS (Eds.), Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care And Well-Being (pp. 1-11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_17-1
  43. MICHEL, J. P., & SADANA, R. (2017). “Healthy aging” concepts and measures. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(6), 460-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.008
  44. MURCIANO-HUESO, A., MARTIN-LUCAS, J., SERRATE GONZÁLEZ, S. & TORRIJOS FINCIAS, P. (2022), "Use and perception of gerontechnology: differences in a group of Spanish older adults", Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-02-2022-0010
  45. NEVEN, L. (2015). By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 93, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.016
  46. NEVEN, L., & BERSCHÖLD, J. (2022). Resourceful Diy Solutions Of Older People As Input For Design. Gerontechnology, 21(s), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2022.21.s.571.2.sp7
  47. NILSSON, H., BÜLOW, P. H., & KAZEMI, A. (2015). Mindful sustainable aging: Advancing a comprehensive approach to the challenges and opportunities of old age. Europe's journal of psychology, 11(3), 494. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i3.949
  48. ÖZSUNGUR, F. (2022). A research on the effects of successful aging on the acceptance and use of technology of the elderly. Assistive Technology, 34(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1691085
  49. PEEK, S. T., LUIJKX, K. G., RIJNAARD, M. D., NIEBOER, M. E., VAN DER VOORT, C. S., AARTS, S., VAN HOOF, J., VRIJHOEF, H. J. M., & WOUTERS, E. J. M. (2016a). Older adults' reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology, 62(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430949
  50. PEEK, S. T., WOUTERS, E. J., VAN HOOF, J., LUIJKX, K. G., BOEIJE, H. R., & VRIJHOEF, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
  51. PEINE, A., & NEVEN, L. (2019). From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
  52. PEINE, A., & NEVEN, L. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technology – a model and agenda. Ageing & Society, 41(12), 2845-2866. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000641
  53. PEINE, A., MARSHALL, B. L., MARTIN, W., & NEVEN, L. (2021). Socio-gerontechnology: key themes, future agendas. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, and L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-Gerontechnology - Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 1-23). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429278266-1
  54. PEKKARINEN, S., MELKAS, H., KUOSMANEN, P., KARISTO, A., & VALVE, R. (2013). Towards a More Social Orientation in Gerontechnology: Case Study of the “Reminiscence Stick.” Journal of Technology in Human Services, 31(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2013.856277
  55. PEW, R. W., & VAN HEMEL, S. B. (Eds.). (2004). Technology for Adaptive Aging. National Academies Press (US). https://doi.org/10.17226/10857
  56. PINTO, M. R., DE MEDICI, S., ZLOTNICKI, A., BIANCHI, A., VAN SANT, C., & NAPOU, C. (1997). Reduced visual acuity in elderly people: the role of ergonomics and gerontechnology. Age And Ageing, 26(5), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.5.339
  57. PORTET, F., VACHER, M., GOLANSKI, C., ROUX, C., MEİLLON, B. (2013). Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Pers Ubiq Comput, 17(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5
  58. RAHMAN, K. A., AHMAD, S. A., SOH, A. C., ASHARI, A., WADA, C., & GOPALAI, A. A. (2021). The Association of Falls with Instability: An Analysis of Perceptions and Expectations toward the Use of Fall Detection Devices Among Older Adults in Malaysia. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.612538
  59. ROBIČ, M., & PAVLIČ, D. R. (2021). COVID-19 and Care for the Elderly in Long-Term Care Facilities: The Role of Information Communication Technology. Acta Medica Academica, 50(3), 414-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.363
  60. ROWE, J. W., & KAHN, R. L. (1987). Human aging: usual and successful. Science, 237(4811), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3299702
  61. SEKINE, S. (2004). Technology on Light Application and Visual Science. IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials, 124(1), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.124.15
  62. SHA, M. (2022, December). Dynamic effect of multiple dimensions of smartness on urban sustainability: based on PVAR model. In International Conference on Smart Transportation and City Engineering (STCE 2022) (Vol. 12460, pp. 1073-1079). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2657925
  63. SHIBA, K., KONDO, N., & KONDO, K. (2016). Informal and Formal Social Support and Caregiver Burden: The AGES Caregiver Survey. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(12), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20150263
  64. SKIBA, D. J. (Ed.). (2012). Technology and Gerontology:Is This in Your Nursing Curriculum? Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(3), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-33.3.207
  65. SØRAA, R. A. (2022). Gerontechnology for who? A responsible framework for diversity and inclusivity for health technology. Gerontechnology, 21(s), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2022.21.s.576.opp6
  66. SUNDGREN, S., STOLT, M. AND SUHONEN, R. (2020), “Ethical issues related to the use of gerontechnology in older people care: a scoping review”, Nursing Ethics, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019845132
  67. Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2006) Healthy Ageing: A challenge for Europe.
  68. TEH, P. L. (2019). 158 Is it Just an Idea or More? Gerontechnology Research in Monash University Malaysia. Age and Ageing, 48(s4), iv34–iv39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz164.158
  69. TEO, A. R., MARKWARDT, S., & HINTON, L. (2019). Using Skype to beat the blues: Longitudinal data from a national representative sample. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(3), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2018.10.014
  70. TERKEŞ, N., & BEKTAŞ, H. (2016). Yaşlı Sağlığı ve Teknoloji Kullanımı. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(4), 153-159. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46793/586774
  71. TURNBULL, M. L., JIN, Y., YAU, A., LAI, M., CHEUNG, M., KWAN, W., WATSON, B. (2021). MHealth in hyper-connected Hong Kong: examining attitudes and access to mobile devices and health information among older Chinese residents. Mhealth. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-20-123
  72. VAN BRONSWIJK, J., BOUMA, H., FOZARD, J., KEARNS, W., DAVISON, G., & TUAN, P. C. (2009). Defining gerontechnology for R&D purposes. Gerontechnology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.01.002.00
  73. WILMOTH, J. R., BAS, D., MUKHERJEE, S., & HANIF, N. (2023). World Social Report 2023: Leaving No One Behind in an Ageing World. UN.
  74. WILSON, G., GATES, J. R., VIJAYKUMAR, S., & MORGAN, D. J. (2023). Understanding older adults’ use of social technology and the factors influencing use. Ageing and Society, 43(1), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000490
  75. World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework (No. WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67215
  76. WU, Y., DAMNÉE, S., KERHERVÉ, H., WARE, C., RIGAUD, A. (2015). Bridging the Digital Divide in Older Adults: A Study From An Initiative To Inform Older Adults About New Technologies. CIA, 193. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s72399
  77. YAZDANPANAHI, M., & HUSSEIN, S. (2021). Sustainable ageing: supporting healthy ageing and independence amongst older Turkish migrants in the UK. Sustainability, 13(18), 10387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810387
  78. ZHANG, Q., Li, M., WU, Y. (2020). Smart Home for Elderly Care: Development and Challenges In China. BMC Geriatrics, 1(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01737-y
  79. ZUBRITSKY, C., ABBOTT, K. M., HIRSCHMAN, K. B., BOWLES, K. H., FOUST, J. B., & NAYLOR, M. D. (2013). Health-related quality of life: Expanding a conceptual framework to include older adults who receive long-term services and supports. The Gerontologist, 53(2), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns093
  80. KALINKARA, V., BAŞIBÜYÜK, G. Ö. & Ay, F. (2016). Yaşlıların Geronteknolojik Ürünleri Kabule Yönelik Tutumları. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 9 (2), 1-19.