SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Conspiracy Theories About the COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals' Vaccine Intention

COVID-19 Pandemisine Yönelik Komplo Teorilerinin Bireylerin Aşı Niyetine Etkisi

Sema Merve Balçık(İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0083-8175
Elif Varol0009-0001-4891-1028
Esra Hatice Oğuz Taşbaş(İSTANBUL 29 MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4268-1700
Pages
251–262
Publication Date
2026-05-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study help us better understand how exposure to conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic affects individuals' behavior and individual differences in our country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The ambiguity during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increasing spread of conspiracies regarding the virus's origin and vaccination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of individuals' beliefs in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 vaccination intentions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study help us better understand how exposure to conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic affects individuals' behavior and individual differences in our country.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · komplo teorileri · aşı niyeti

Abstract

Aim: The ambiguity during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increasing spread of conspiracies regarding the virus's origin and vaccination. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of individuals' beliefs in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 vaccination intentions. In addition, this study aims to explore the relationship between potential individual differences in COVID-19 vaccination intentions and beliefs in COVID-19 related conspiracy theories. Method: The participants (N=170) were randomly assigned to three groups: the group exposed to pro-conspiracy information, the group exposed to anti-conspiracy information, and the control group. After the group manipulation, participants were expected to respond to the Anti-Vaccination Scale and the Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories Scale, and they were asked to report their education level, income level, level of conservatism, and political position. Results: The findings showed that individuals' attitudes towards vaccination were negative when they were exposed to conspiracy manipulation. Their attitudes towards vaccination were positively affected when they were exposed to anti-conspiracy manipulation. In addition, it was observed that individuals' attitudes towards vaccination and tendency to believe in conspiracy theories can be affected by conservatism and their education level. Conclusion: The current study demonstrated that exposure to pro-conspiracy and anti-conspiracy manipulations could impact vaccine attitudes. Additionally, when examining demographic variables, it was observed that conservatism and education level were associated with vaccine attitudes and conspiracy beliefs. protection. The findings of the study help us better understand how exposure to conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 pandemic affects individuals' behavior and individual differences in our country.

Özet

Amaç: COVID-19 salgını sürecinde ortaya çıkan belirsizlik çerçevesinde, söz konusu virüsün kökeni, aşılarla ilgili komplo teorilerinin hızla yayılmasına neden olmuştur. Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, bireylerin komplo teorilerine duydukları inancın COVID-19 aşı niyetleri üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılmasıdır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada, potansiyel bireysel farklılıkların COVID-19 aşı niyetleri ve komplo teorilerine duyulan inançla ilişkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Katılımcılar (N=170), komplo yanlısı bilgiye maruz bırakılan grup, komplo karşıtı bilgiye maruz bırakılan grup ve kontrol grubuna seçkisiz olarak atanmıştır. Grup manipülasyonunun ardından katılımcılardan, Aşı Karşıtlığı Ölçeği ve COVID-19’a Yönelik Komplo Teorileri Ölçeği’ni cevaplandırmaları beklenmiş, bireysel farklılıkları inceleyebilmek amacıyla eğitim seviyesi, gelir düzeyi, muhafazakârlık düzeyi ve politik konumlarını bildirmeleri istenmiştir. Bulgular: Bulgular, Türkiye’de yaşayan bireylerin komplo yanlısı manipülasyona maruz kaldıklarında aşılanmaya yönelik tutumlarının olumsuz, komplo karşıtı manipülasyona maruz kaldıklarında ise aşılanmaya yönelik tutumlarının olumlu etkilendiğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca, bireylerin aşılanmaya yönelik tutumlarının ve komplo teorilerine inanma eğilimlerinin politik eğilimlerinden ve eğitim seviyelerinden etkilenebildiği görülmüştür. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, mevcut çalışma ile komplo yanlısı ve komplo karşıtı manipülasyona maruz kalmanın aşı tutumuna etki edebileceği gösterilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra muhafazakârlık ve eğitim seviyesinin de aşı tutumu ve komplo inançları ile ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, ülkemizde COVID-19 pandemisine yönelik komplo teorilerine maruz kalmanın, bireysel farklılıklarla birlikte kişilerin davranışlarını nasıl etkilediğini daha iyi anlamamıza yardım edecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balçık, S. M., Varol, E., Taşbaş, E. H. O. (2026). The Effect of Conspiracy Theories About the COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals' Vaccine Intention. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1606645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. AKBAŞ, E. (2020). Covid-19’un toplumsal etkileri. İ. Demir (Ed.), Kovid-19 ve sonrası: Disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşım (ss. 5-9). ULİSA.
  2. AKTAŞ, A. (2022). Sağlık İnanç Modeli Bağlamında Yeni Koronavirüs Hastalığına (COVID-19) Yönelik Tutumların Değerlendirilmesi: Tanımlayıcı Bir Araştırma, Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Science, 7(3), 899-908. doi: 10.5336/healthsci.2021-86341
  3. AKYÜZ, S. S. (2017). Aşı karşıtlığı ve şeffaflık algısında iletişim pratikleri ve siyasal aidiyetlerin rolü. Electronic Journal of New Media, 5(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.17932/iau.ejnm.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i2005
  4. AKYÜZ, S. S. (2020). Yanlış bilgi salgını: COVID-19 salgını döneminde Türkiye’de dolaşıma giren sahte haberler. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.779920
  5. ALPER, S. & IMHOFF, R. (2022). Suspecting foul play when it is objectively there: the association of political orientation with general and partisan conspiracy beliefs as a function of corruption levels. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221113965
  6. ALPER, S., BAYRAK, F. & YILMAZ, O. (2021). Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current Psychology, 40(11), 5708-5717. 10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0
  7. ALI, M., AHMAD, N., KHAN, H., ALI, S., AKBAR, F. & HUSSAIN, Z. (2019). Polio vaccination controversy in Pakistan. The Lancet, 394(10202), 915–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32101-4
  8. BOZKURT, V. (2020, 21 Nisan). Covid 19 ve komplo teorileri: Kimler komplo teorilerine inanıyor? Fikir Turu. https://fikirturu.com/toplum/covid-19-ve-komplo-teorileri-kimler-komplo-teorilerine-inaniyor/
  9. BRUDER, M., HAFFKE, P., NEAVE, N., NOURIPANAH, N. & IMHOFF, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(225). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
  10. BRUNS, A., HURCOMBE, E. & HARRINGTON, S. (2021). Covering conspiracy: Approaches to reporting the COVID/5G conspiracy theory. Digital Journalism, 10(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1968921
  11. DOUGLAS, K. M. & SUTTON, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.148.2.210-222
  12. DOUGLAS, K. M., SUTTON, R. M., CALLAN, M. J., DAWTRY, R. J. & HARVEY, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
  13. DOUGLAS, K., SUTTON, R. & CICHOCKA, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
  14. DOUGLAS, K. M., USCINSKI, J. E., SUTTON, R. M., CICHOCKA, A., NEFES, T., ANG, C. S. & DERAVI, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
  15. EARNSHAW, V. A., EATON, L. A., KALICHMAN, S. C., BROUSSEAU, N. M., HILL, E. C. & FOX, A. B. (2020). COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(4), 850-856. 10.1093/tbm/ibaa090
  16. ECKER, U. K., LEWANDOWSKY, S. & TANG, D. T. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1087-1100. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
  17. GOLDBERG, Z. J. & RICHEY, S. (2020). Anti-vaccination beliefs and unrelated conspiracy theories. World Affairs, 183(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020920554
  18. GRAHAM, T., BRUNS, A., ZHU, G. & CAMPBELL, R. (2020). Like a virus: The coordinated spread of Coronavirus disinformation. The Australia Institute. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/202960
  19. GOREIS, A. & VORACEK, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
  20. GRZESIAK-FELDMAN, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology, 32(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6
  21. GÜLGEZ, Z. & BOZKUR, B. (2021). An investigation of conspiracy theories On COVID-19: Turkey’s case. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(15), 1179–1217. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.319
  22. HOLFORD, D., LOPEZ-LOPEZ, E., FASCE, A., KARLSSON L. C., LEWANDOWSKY, S. (2024). Identifying the underlying psychological constructs from self-expressed anti-vaccination argumentation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 926. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03416-4
  23. HORNSEY, M. J., HARRIS, E. A. & FIELDING, K. S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000586
  24. JOLLEY, D. & DOUGLAS, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. Plos One, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
  25. KATA, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
  26. KHAN, Y. H., MALLHI, T. H., ALOTAIBI, N. H., ALZAREA, A. I., ALANAZI, A. S., TANVEER, N. & HASHMI, F. K. (2020). Threat of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The need for measures to neutralize misleading narratives. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(2), 603–604. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0654
  27. KILINÇARSLAN, M. G., SARIGÜL, B., TORAMAN, E. & ŞAHİN, E. M. (2020). Development of valid and reliable scale of vaccine hesitancy in Turkish language. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.693711
  28. LEWANDOWSKY, S., OBERAUER, K. & GIGNAC, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
  29. LOBATO, E., MENDOZA, J., SIMS, V. & CHIN, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
  30. MARCHLEWSKA, M., CICHOCKA, A. & KOSSOWSKA, M. (2017). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2308
  31. MARTINEZ-BRAVO, M. & STEGMANN, A. (2021). In vaccines we trust? The effects of the CIA’s vaccine ruse on immunization in Pakistan. Journal of the European Economic Association, 20(1), 150–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab018
  32. MCCAULEY, C. & JACQUES, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637
  33. NASA. (2019). Why Are Planets Round? NASA Science. https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/planets-round/en/#:~:text=A%20planet%20is%20round%20because,is%20a%20three%2Ddimensional%20circle.
  34. NEUMANN, L. (2020). From measles to the flu, more Turkish parents are saying no to. The World. https://theworld.org/stories/2019-07-26/measles-flu-more-turkish-parents-are-saying-no-vaccines
  35. OLIVER, J. E. & WOOD, T. (2014). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 817-818. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
  36. PASEK, J., STARK, T. H., KROSNICK, J. A. & TOMPSON, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009
  37. PEREIRA, P. S., SILVEIRA, A. D. S. & PEREIRA, A. (2020). Disinformation and conspiracy theories in the age of COVID-19. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.5606814
  38. SALALI, G. & UYSAL, M. (2020). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is associated with beliefs on the origin of the novel coronavirus in the UK and Turkey. Psychological Medicine, 1-3. 10.1017/S0033291720004067
  39. SIDERS, D. & WARD, M. (2020). A fight over data infiltrates Trumpworld’s response to coronavirus. POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/10/trump-coronavirus-data-modeling-179226
  40. STERNISKO, A., CICHOCKA, A. & VAN BAVEL, J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007
  41. SUNSTEIN, C. R. & VERMEULE, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
  42. SWAMI, V., CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC, T. & FURNHAM, A. (2009). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583
  43. SWAMI, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280.
  44. SWIFT, A. (2021). Majority in U.S. Still Believe JFK Killed in a Conspiracy. Gallup.Com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/165893/majority-believe-jfk-killed-conspiracy.aspx
  45. T.C. SAĞLIK BAKANLIĞI. (2020). COVID-19 (Sars-Cov2 Enfeksiyonu) Rehberi. Ankara. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66337/genel-bilgiler-epidemiyoloji-ve-tani.html
  46. VAN PROOIJEN, J. W. & JOSTMANN, N. B. (2012). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
  47. VAN PROOIJEN, J. W. & ACKER, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3161
  48. VAN PROOIJEN, J. W. (2016). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
  49. WHITSON, J. A. & GALINSKY, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845
  50. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (2019). Ten threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
  51. YILMAZ, H. İ., TURĞUT, B., ÇITLAK, G., MERT, O., PARALI, B., ENGİN, M., AKTAŞ, A. & ALİMOĞLU, O. (2021). Türkiye’de insanların COVID-19 aşısına bakışı. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 48(3), 583– 594. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988080
  52. YURTTAS, B., POYRAZ, B. C., SUT, N., OZDEDE, A., OZTAS, M., UĞURLU, S., TABAK, F., HAMURYUDAN, V. & SEYAHİ, E. (2021). Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine among patients with rheumatic diseases, healthcare workers and general population in Turkey: a web-based survey. Rheumatology International, 41(6), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04841-3