SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

The Entrepreneurial Side of the Mind: A Bibliometric Analysis of Neuroentrepreneurship Literature

Zihnin Girişimci Yönü: Nörogirişimcilik Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Analizi

Elif Habip(İstanbul Galata Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6297-8624
Pages
744–764
Publication Date
2026-10-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been concluded that this field, due to its structure suitable for interdisciplinary approaches, offers significant opportunities for new research that will deepen the interaction between entrepreneurship and neuroscience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim : This study seeks to clarify the concept of neuroentrepreneurship, positioned at the intersection of entrepreneurship and neuroscience, and to examine this field through a bibliometric analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Neuroentrepreneurship, first introduced into the literature in 2006, seeks to investigate entrepreneurial behavior and decision-making processes from a neuroscientific perspective.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been concluded that this field, due to its structure suitable for interdisciplinary approaches, offers significant opportunities for new research that will deepen the interaction between entrepreneurship and neuroscience.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · Nörobilim · Nörogirişimcilik

Abstract

Aim : This study seeks to clarify the concept of neuroentrepreneurship, positioned at the intersection of entrepreneurship and neuroscience, and to examine this field through a bibliometric analysis. Neuroentrepreneurship, first introduced into the literature in 2006, seeks to investigate entrepreneurial behavior and decision-making processes from a neuroscientific perspective. Method : The study conducted a search using the keyword "neuroentrepreneur**" in the Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS databases. The resulting publications were systematically analyzed according to their distribution by year, journal, country of origin, citation frequency, and key concepts. Furthermore, scientific mapping was conducted using VOSviewer software, and content analysis was employed to identify the methodologies and prominent themes of the publications. Results : As a result of the keyword searches, 15 publications were identified in the WoS database and 25 in the Scopus database. This suggests that the analysis focused on a limited number of publications, but the number of publications has increased over the years. Furthermore, it was determined that certain countries and journals are leading the field, and their citation rates reflect this. Most strikingly, the United States holds the highest publication count in both indexes. Furthermore, the content analysis indicates that neuroentrepreneurship studies primarily focus on concepts related to “entrepreneurial behavior”, “decision-making processes”, and “neuroscientific measurement methods”. Conclusion : The study revealed that neuroentrepreneurship remains an infant field of scholarly inquiry. It has been concluded that this field, due to its structure suitable for interdisciplinary approaches, offers significant opportunities for new research that will deepen the interaction between entrepreneurship and neuroscience.

Özet

Amaç : Bu çalışma, girişimcilik ve nörobilimin kesişim noktası olan nörogirişimcilik kavramını açıklamayı ve bu alanı bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Nörogirişimcilik, 2006 yılından itibaren literatürde yer almakta olup, girişimcilik davranışını ve karar alma süreçlerini nörobilim perspektifinden analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem : Çalışmada Web of Science (WoS) ve SCOPUS veri tabanlarında “neuroentrepreneur**” terimi anahtar kelime olarak kullanılarak arama yapılmıştır. Elde edilen yayınların yıllara göre dağılımı, yayımlandıkları dergiler, ülkelerin konumu, atıf oranları ve anahtar kavramlar analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca VOSviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla bilimsel haritalama yapılmış, içerik analizi yöntemiyle de yayınların kullandıkları metodolojiler ve öne çıkan temalar belirlenmiştir. Bulgular : Anahtar kelimeyle yapılan taramalar sonucunda, WoS veri tabanında 15, SCOPUS veri tabanında ise 25 yayın bulundu. Bu durum analizin sınırlı sayıda yayınla olduğunu, ancak yıllar içinde yayın sayısının arttığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, belirli ülke ve dergilerin alanda öncü olduğu ve atıf oranlarının alana olan ilgiyi yansıttığı belirlenmiştir. En dikkat çekici sonuç ise Amerika'nın her iki dizinde de en çok yayına sahip ülke konumunda olmasıdır. Ek olarak içerik analizinin sonuçları da nörogirişimcilik çalışmalarının "girişimci davranış", "karar alma süreçleri" ve "nörobilimsel ölçüm yöntemleri"yle ilgili kavramlarını odağa aldığını göstermektedir. Sonuç : Çalışmanın sonucunda, nörogirişimcilik alanının henüz emekleme aşamasında olan bir araştırma sahası olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Disiplinlerarası yaklaşımlara elverişli yapısı nedeniyle bu alanın, girişimcilik ve nörobilim etkileşimini derinleştirecek yeni araştırmalar için dikkate değer fırsatlar sunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Habip, E. (2026). The Entrepreneurial Side of the Mind: A Bibliometric Analysis of Neuroentrepreneurship Literature. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 744–764. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1767256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. ABDULLAH, M. A., KADİR, M. A. B. A., & AHMAD, B. E. (2023). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Review and Proposed Model. Academic Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1-17.
  2. ACS, Z. J., & AUDRETSCH, D. B. (2003). Introduction to the handbook of entrepreneurship research. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. Boston, MA: Springer.
  3. AHLFORS, S. P., & MODY, M. (2016). Overview of MEG. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116676344
  4. AHMAD, A., & KOMAI, S. (2016). Reducing the gap in neuroscience research between developed and developing countries. International Journal of Neuroscience, 126(3), 287–288. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207454.2015.1013194
  5. AJZEN, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  6. ALDRICH, H. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Research in the Sociology of Work, 15, 3-31.
  7. BALLI, A., & AYCI, A. (2021). Nörobilim yaklaşımıyla girişimcilikte farklı bir boyut: Nörogirişimcilik. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (22), 184-194.
  8. BANDURA, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
  9. BAUCUS, D. A., BAUCUS, M. S., & MITCHELL, R. K. (2014). Lessons from the neural foundation of entrepreneurial cognition: the case of emotion and motivation. In Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition (pp. 254–315). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. BELTZ, A. M., & MOSER, J. S. (2020). Ovarian hormones: A long overlooked but critical contributor to cognitive brain structures and function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464(1), 156-180.
  11. BERES, A. M. (2017). Time is of the essence: A review of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in language research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 42, 247–255.
  12. CHEN, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40.
  13. COBO, M. J., LÓPEZ-HERRERA, A. G., & HERRERA-VIEDMA, E. (2015). A relational database model for science mapping analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12(6), 43- 62.
  14. CONTIU, L. C., GABOR, M. R., & STEFANESCU, D. (2012). Hofstede's cultural dimensions and student's ability to develop an entrepreneurial spirit. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5553-5557.
  15. CUI, X. U., BAKER, J. M., LIU, N., & REISS, A. L. (2015). Sensitivity of fNIRS measurement to head motion: An applied use of smartphones in the lab. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 245, 37–43.
  16. CUSTDIO, P. (2010). Use of EEG as a neuroscientific approach to advertising research. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(4), 284-292.
  17. DECI, E. L., & RYAN, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1(20), 416-436.
  18. DESMOND, N. (2010). Networking in Ireland’s ethnic enterprises: Entrepreneurship and opportunity. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  19. DIETRICH, A., & KANSO, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822.
  20. DİNCER AYDIN, H. U. (2021). Nörogirişimcilik: Yaratıcılık, fırsat tanımlama ve karar verme sürecine yönelik bir araştırma. Doktora tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
  21. DOH, J. P., TASHMAN, P., & BENISCHKE, M. H. (2019). Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 450-468.
  22. FISKE, J. (1996). İletişim çalışmalarına giriş. (S. İrvan, Çev.). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  23. GLOVER, G. H. (2011). Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery Clinics, 22(2), 133–139.
  24. GÜNEY, S. (2008). Girişimcilik: Temel kavramlar ve Bazı Güncel Konular. Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  25. HATTEN, T. S. (2012). Small Business Management Entrepreneurship and Beyond, Fifth Edition, South-Western Cengage Learning, Canada.
  26. HAYNIE, J. M., SHEPHERD, D., MOSAKOWSKI, E., & EARLEY, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217-229.
  27. HISRICH, R. D. & PETERS, M. P. (1995). Entrepreneurship–Starting Developing and Managing a New Enterprise, Richard D, Irwin. INC, USA.
  28. JUÁREZ-VARÓN, D., ZULUAGA, J. C. S., & RECUERDA, A. M. (2024). Neuroentrepreneurship: state of the art and future lines of work. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-00969-3
  29. KABLE, J. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: A functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(2), 63.
  30. KRUEGER JR, N. F., & DAY, M. (2010). Looking forward, looking backward: From entrepreneurial cognition to neuroentrepreneurship. Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction, 321-357.
  31. LAWRENCE, A., CLARK, L., LABUZETTA, J. N., SAHAKIAN, B., & VYAKARNUM, S. (2008). The innovative brain. Nature, 456(7219), 168-169.
  32. LIGHT, G. A., WILLIAMS, L. E., MINOW, F., SPROCK, J., RISSLING, A., SHARP, R., SWERDLOW, N. R., & BRAFF, D. L. (2010). Electroencephalography (EEG) and event‐related potentials (ERPs) with human participants. Current Protocols in Neuroscience, 52(1), 6–25.
  33. MANDAL, P. K., BANERJEE, A., TRİPATHİ, M., & SHARMA, A. (2018). A Comprehensive Review of Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Studies for Brain Functionality in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). In Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience (Vol. 12).
  34. MARTÍNEZ, M. A., COBO, M. J., HERRERA, M., & HERRERA-VIEDMA, E. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257–277.
  35. MINGERS, J., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European journal of operational research, 246(1), 1-19.
  36. MOED, H. F. (2009). New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 57, 13-18.
  37. MOORE, C., MCINTYRE, N. H., LANİVİCH, S. E., & LEVASSEUR, L. (2019, July). ADHD and the Entrepreneurial Mindset. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 11086). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  38. National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORT. (2024). Estimates of Funding for Various Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDC).
  39. NICOLAOU, N., & SHANE, S. (2014). Biology, neuroscience, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 98-100.
  40. NIR, Y., DINSTEIN, I., MALACH, R., & HEEGER, D. J. (2008). BOLD and spiking activity. Nature Neuroscience, 11(5), 523–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0508-523
  41. OĞUZ, F. (2005). Schumpeter’den Baumol’a Girişimcilik Anlayışı Üzerine. Piyasa, C, 4.
  42. ÖZKUL, G., & DULUPÇU, M. A. (2007). Kişisel gelişimin girişimci tipleri üzerine etkisi: Antalya-Isparta illerinde bir inceleme. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 2(2), 67-92.
  43. PASSAS, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2).1014-1025.
  44. PÉREZ-CENTENO, V. (2017). Brain-driven entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. Handbook of research methodologies and design in neuroentrepreneurship, 13-53.
  45. POSNER, M. I., & DIGIROLAMO, G. J. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience: origins and promise. Psychological bulletin, 126(6), 873.
  46. PRITCHARD, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
  47. RATTEN, V. (2023). Entrepreneurship: Definitions, opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(5), 79-90.
  48. ROBINSON, T. E., & BERRIDGE, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain research reviews, 18(3), 247-291.
  49. ROCHA, V. C. (2012). The entrepreneur in economic theory: from an invisible man toward a new research field. Porto: University of Porto.
  50. ROEMER, R. C., & BORCHARDT, R. (2015). Meaningful metrics: A 21st century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Association of College and Research Libraries.
  51. SÁNCHEZ, J. C., CARBALLO, T., & GUTIÉRREZ, A. (2011). The entrepreneur from a cognitive approach. Psicothema, 23(3), 433–438.
  52. SANYANG, S. E., & HUANG, W. C. (2010). Entrepreneurship and economic development: The EMPRETEC showcase. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6, 317-329.
  53. SHANE, S., & VENKATARAMAN, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  54. SINGH, S. P. (2014). Magnetoencephalography: basic principles. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 17(Suppl 1), S107–S112.
  55. SOUSA, A. M., MEYER, K. A., SANTPERE, G., GULDEN, F. O., & SESTAN, N. (2017). Evolution of the human nervous system function, structure, and development. Cell, 170(2), 226-247.
  56. SUR, S., & SİNHA, V. K. (2009). Event-related potential: An overview. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(1), 70–73.
  57. THE BRAIN INITIATIVE. (2024). The BRAIN Initiative. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved August 26, 2025, from https://braininitiative.nih.gov/
  58. TOGA, A. W., & THOMPSON, P. M. (2005). Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 28(1), 1-23.
  59. VAN ECK, N. J. & WALTMAN, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. http://www.vosviewer.com/. Accessed on: 10.12.2023.
  60. VOGT, N. (2015). A digital piece of brain. Nature Methods, 12(10), 905. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3605
  61. WOODMAN, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2031–2046.
  62. YU, X., LIU, T., HE, L., & LI, Y. (2023). Micro-foundations of strategic decision-making in family business organisations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Long Range Planning, 56(5), 102198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102198
  63. ZARO, M. A., FAGUNDES, L. D. C., ROCHA, F. T., & NUNES, W. C. (2016). Cognitive brain mapping used in the study of entrepreneurial behavior–pilot test with the use of electroencephalogram-EEG during the process of identification of business opportunities. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 472-478.