SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 16

Dressing Technologies Used in Wound Care: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yara Bakımında Kullanılan Yara Örtüsü Teknolojileri: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların İncelenmesi

Mahmut Dağcı(BEZM-İ ÂLEM VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0883-9129
Deniz Öztekin(DOĞUŞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-5215-7913
Pages
271–283
Publication Date
2022-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yara bakımı · yara iyileşmesi · yara örtüsü

Abstract

Aim: This review was planned to determine the characteristics of the most frequently used modern wound dressings in the last five years and their effects on wound healing.

Özet

Amaç: Bu derleme, son beş yılda en sık kullanılan modern yara bakım örtülerinin özelliklerinin ve yara iyileşmesine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla planlandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dağcı, M., Öztekin, D. (2022). Dressing Technologies Used in Wound Care: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Sayı: 16, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.996192

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Vogenberg FR, Santilli J. Healthcare trends for 2018. American Health & Drug Benefits. 2018;11(1):48-54.
  2. World Health Organization. Global Health Expenditure Database. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/nha/database. Yayınlanma tarihi Eylül 2021. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  3. Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S. The Global Innovation Index. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S, eds. Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance innovation? 13th ed. New York:2020:8. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf. Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  4. Madden M, Stark J. Understanding the development of advanced wound care in the UK: Interdisciplinary perspectives on care, cure and innovation. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2019;28(2):107-114. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2019.03.003.
  5. Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data. Advances in Wound Care. 2014;3(8):511-529. doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0401.
  6. Rezvani GE, Khalili S, Nouri KS, Esmaeely NR, Ramakrishna, S. Wound dressings: current advances and future directions. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2019;136(27): 47738. doi:10.1002/app.47738.
  7. Silva JR, Burger B, Kühl C, Candreva T, Dos Anjos MB, Rodrigues HG. Wound healing and omega-6 fatty acids: from inflammation to repair. Mediators of Inflammation. 2018;(Special Issue):1-17. doi:10.1155/2018/2503950.
  8. Monaro S, Pinkova J, Ko N, Stromsmoe N, Gullick J. Chronic wound care delivery in wound clinics, community nursing and residential aged care settings: a qualitative analysis using Levine’s Conservation Model. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021;30(9-10):1295-1311. doi:10.1111/jocn.15674.
  9. Blackburn J, Ousey K, Stephenson J. Nurses’ education, confidence, and competence in appropriate dressing choice. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2019;32(10):470-476. doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000577132.81124.88.
  10. Görgülü RS. Hemşireler İçin Fiziksel Muayene Yöntemleri. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi; 2014.
  11. Welsh L. Wound care evidence, knowledge and education amongst nurses: a semi‐systematic literature review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):53-61. doi:10.1111/iwj.12822.
  12. Lei J, Sun L, Li P, et al. The wound dressings and their applications in wound healing and management. Health Science Journal. 2019;13(4):1-8. doi:10.36648/1791-809X.1000662.
  13. Shi C, Wang C, Liu H, et al. Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8:1-8. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00182.
  14. Rando T, Kang AC, Guerin M, Boylan J, Dyer A. Simplifying wound dressing selection for residential aged care. Journal of Wound Care. 2018;27(8):504-511. doi:10.12968/jowc.2018.27.8.504.
  15. Luo Z, Jiang L, Xu C, et al. Engineered janus amphipathic polymeric fiber films with unidirectional drainage and anti-adhesion abilities to accelerate wound healing. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;42(2):127725. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127725.
  16. Weller CD, Team V, Sussman G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:155. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00155.
  17. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, et al. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2018;31(1):28-58. doi:10.1159/000481545.
  18. Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. European Surgical Research. 2017;58:81-94. doi:10.1159/000454919.
  19. Deutsch CJ, Edwards DM, Myers S. Wound dressings. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2017;78(7):103-109. doi:10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.C103.
  20. Hasatsri S, Pitiratanaworanat A, Swangwit S, Boochakul C, Tragoonsupachai C. Comparison of the morphological and physical properties of different absorbent wound dressings. Dermatology Research and Practice. 2018;2018:1-6. doi:10.1155/2018/9367034.
  21. Probst SD, Seppänen SM, Gerber V, Hopkins A, Rimdeika RM, Gethin G. EWMA Document: home care-wound care: overview, challenges and perspectives. Journal of Wound Care. 2014;23:1-41. doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.sup5a.s1.
  22. Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, Phillips TJ. Wound healing and treating wounds: chronic wound care and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016;74(4):607-625. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.070.
  23. Boga SM. Nursing practices in the prevention of post-operative wound infection in accordance with evidence-based approach. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2019;12(2):1228-35.
  24. Edwards HE, Chang AM, Gibb M, Finlayson KJ, Parker C, O'Reilly M. Reduced prevalence and severity of wounds following implementation of the champions for skin integrity model to facilitate uptake of evidence‐based practice in aged care. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(23-24):4276-85. doi:10.1111/jocn.13752.
  25. Essa MS, Ahmad KS, Zayed ME, Ibrahim SG. Comparative study between silver nanoparticles dressing (SilvrSTAT Gel) and conventional dressing in diabetic foot ulcer healing: a prospective randomized study. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2021;1534734620988217. doi: 10.1177/1534734620988217.
  26. Mecott GA, González-Cantú I, Dorsey-Treviño EG, et al. Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with second-degree burns: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2020;33(4):1-7. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000655484.95155.f7.
  27. Lee YJ, Kim JY, Shin WY. Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: a randomised controlled trial. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(Suppl. 1): 36-42. doi:10.1111/iwj.13028.
  28. DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multi‐centre clinical trial in 80 patients. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):950-957. doi:10.1111/iwj.12954.
  29. Edmonds M, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Alfayate-García JM, et al. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (explorer): An international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2018; 6(3):186-196. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2.
  30. Meekul J, Chotirosniramit A, Himakalasa W, et al. A randomized controlled trial on the outcome in comparing an alginate silver dressing with a conventional treatment of a necrotizing fasciitis wound. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2017;16(2):108-113. doi:10.1177/1534734617701051.
  31. León AH, Hebal F, Stake C, Baldwin K, Barsness KA. Prevention of hypergranulation tissue after gastrostomy tube placement: a randomised controlled trial of hydrocolloid dressings. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(1):41-46. doi:10.1111/iwj. 12978.
  32. Tsang KK, Kwong EWY, To TSS, Chung JWY, Wong TKS. A pilot randomized, controlled study of nanocrystalline silver, manuka honey, and conventional dressing in healing diabetic foot ulcer. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017:1-15. doi:10.1155/2017/5294890.
  33. Bianchi C, Cazzell S, Vayser D, Reyzelman AM, Dosluoglu H, Tovmassian G. A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (EpiFix®) allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):114-122. doi:10.1111/iwj.12843.
  34. David F, Wurtz JL, Breton N, Bisch O, Gazeu P, Kerihuel, JC. A randomised, controlled, non‐inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone‐coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(1):159-69. doi:10.1111/iwj.12853.
  35. Meuleneire F. Management of diabetic foot ulcers using dressings with Safetac: a review of case studies. Wounds UK. 2008;4(4):16-30.
  36. Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, Cohen N, Shachar IB. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215(3):388.e1-e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.035.
  37. Ousey K, Rogers AA, Rippon MG. Hydro-responsive wound dressings simplify TIME wound management framework. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2016;21(Sup12):39-49. doi:10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup12.S39.
  38. Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):735. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735.
  39. Totty JP, Bua N, Smith GE, et al. Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)-coated dressings in the management and prevention of wound infection: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2017;26(3):107-114. doi:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.3.107.
  40. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin MN. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2017.
  41. Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, et al. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Archives of Dermatology. 2007;143(10):1297-1304. doi:10.1001/archderm.143.10.1297.
  42. Bugeja L, Low JK, McGinnes RA, Team V, Sinha S, Weller C. Barriers and enablers to patient recruitment for randomised controlled trials on treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. International Wound Journal. 2018;15(6):880-892. doi:10.1111/iwj.12940.
  43. Bekara F, Vitse J, Fluieraru S, et al. New techniques for wound management: a systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2018;45(2):102-110. doi:10.5999/aps.2016.02019.
  44. Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Hinchliffe RJ, Lipsky BA, IWGDF Editorial Board. Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3266.
  45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 12-15. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf Erişim tarihi 13 Ocak 2022.
  46. Nair H, Venkateshwaran N, Seetharaman SS, Deng W, Uthaipaisanwong A, Galea E. Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care. 2021;30(Sup4):42-52. doi:10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S42.
  47. Wen J, Jin X, Al Sayah F, Johnson JA, Paulden M, Ohinmaa A. Economic evaluation of sucrose octasulfate dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers for type 2 diabetes patients. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2021;45(8):734-742. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.07.001.
  48. Davis JW. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal. 1910;15:307. doi:10.1097/00000658-190909000-00022.
  49. Gönüllü N. Laparoskopik ventral fıtık cerrahisinde komplikasyonlar ve önlenmesi. Endoskopik Laparoskopik & Minimal İnvaziv Cerrahi Dergisi. 2011;18(3):168-173.
  50. Dietz UA, Menzel S, Lock J, Wiegering, A. The treatment of incisional hernia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2018;115(3):31-7. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0031.
  51. Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T, et al. Human amniotic membrane dressing for the treatment of an infected wound due to an entero-cutaneous fistula: case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2018;51:11-3. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.015.