SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 16

Turkish Adaptation of the Brief Form of the Eating Motivation Survey: Validity and Reliability Study

Yeme Motivasyonu Anketi Kısa Formunun Türkçe Uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Rabia Melda Karaağaç(İSTANBUL GEDİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2022-2404
Serap Andaç Öztürk(İSTANBUL SABAHATTİN ZAİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6253-4118
Pages
33–47
Publication Date
2022-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the brief form of the Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) in adults.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the brief form of the Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) in adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the brief form of the Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) in adults.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the brief form of the Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) in adults.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:yeme motivasyonu · geçerlilik · güvenilirlik

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the brief form of the Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) in adults.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yeme Motivasyonu Anketi’nin (TEMS) kısa formunun Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin yetişkin bireylerde belirlenmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaağaç, R. M., Öztürk, S. A. (2022). Turkish Adaptation of the Brief Form of the Eating Motivation Survey: Validity and Reliability Study. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Sayı: 16, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1017269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Grimm ER, Steinle NI. Genetics of eating behavior: established and emerging concepts. Nutrition Reviews. 2011;69(1):52–60.
  2. Renner B, Sproesser G, Strohbach S, Schupp HT. Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS). Appetite. 2012;59(1):117–28.
  3. Pirc M, Čad EM, Jager G, Smeets PAM. Grab to eat! Eating motivation dynamics measured by effort exertion depend on hunger state. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;78(103741).
  4. Gündüz N, Akhalil M, Sevgi E. Hedonik açlık. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal. 2020;3(1):80-96.
  5. Kaya IH. Motivation factors of consumers’ food choice. Food Nutr Sci. 2016;07(03):149–154.
  6. Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite. 1999;33(1):71–88.
  7. Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite. 1995;25(3):267–84.
  8. Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2004.
  9. Nuttall FQ. Body mass index: Obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutr Today. 2015;50(3):117–128.
  10. Aydın BZ. Faktör analizi yardımıyla performans ölçütlerinin boyutlarının ortaya konulması. In: 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve İstatistik Kongresi; 2007; İnönü Üniversitesi Malatya, Türkiye.
  11. Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10(7).
  12. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık; 2012.
  13. Çokluk O, Şekercioğlu, G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları; 2016.
  14. Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194–197.
  15. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(3):269–274.
  16. Sproesser G, Ruby MB, Arbit N, Rozin P, Schupp HT, Renner B. The eating motivation survey: results from the USA, India and Germany. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(3):515–525.
  17. Sproesser G, Moraes JMM, Renner B, Alvarenga MDS. The eating motivation survey in Brazil: results from a sample of the general adult population. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2334.
  18. Kelloway EK. Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide. New York: Sage Pbc; 1998.
  19. Kilic S. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. J Mood Disord. 2016;6(1):47.
  20. Aktürk Z. Reliability and validity in medical research. Dicle Med J. 2012;39(2):316–9.
  21. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Uludağ Tıp Derg. 2004;30(3):211-21.