Journals / Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 27

The Turkish Adaptation Study of Technostress Resources Scale

Teknostres Kaynakları Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Pages
591–616
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From this, it can be said that the Turkish form is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine to existing situation of teachers in the context of Turkish culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt the "Technostress Resources Scale" developed by Ayyagari, Grover and Purvis (2011) to Turkish and to carry out the validity and reliability studies of Turkish form.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the implementation, a high level of statistically significance relationship (r> .70) was determined between both forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From this, it can be said that the Turkish form is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine to existing situation of teachers in the context of Turkish culture.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the "Technostress Resources Scale" developed by Ayyagari, Grover and Purvis (2011) to Turkish and to carry out the validity and reliability studies of Turkish form. In this context, the scale adaptation process consisting of seven steps has been carried out. Initially, process from source language to target language translation is actualized by three high-level academicians in both languages, one academician in the field of foreign language and two academicians in the field of instructional technology. Afterwards, a field proficient in the field of instructional technology determined the most appropriate items from the three translation forms obtained. After this step, the pilot application was started and the original form. The Original form and The Turkish form were applied to the last grade English teacher candidates who master in both language and have characteristic of target participants and the relationship between the two forms was examined. As a result of the implementation, a high level of statistically significance relationship (r> .70) was determined between both forms. For this reason, the back-translation process has not been done. The Turkish form that was ensured language equivalence was applied to 177 teachers and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out on collected data. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that all the items had statistically significant load under the factors and were within acceptable adaptation intervals from the model fit statistics. From this, it can be said that the Turkish form is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine to existing situation of teachers in the context of Turkish culture.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Ayyagari, Grover ve Purvis (2011) tarafından geliştirilmiş “Teknostres kaynakları ölçeği” ni Türkçeye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını yapmaktır. Bu kapsamda yedi adımdan oluşan ölçek uyarlama süreci yürütülmüştür. İlk olarak kaynak dilden hedef dile çeviri süreci, biri yabancı dil, ikisi öğretim teknolojileri alanında çalışmakta olan her iki dile üst düzeyde hakim akademisyen tarafından gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha sonra bir öğretim teknolojileri alan uzmanı elde edilen üç çeviri formu üzerinden en uygun olan maddeleri belirlemiştir. Bu aşamadan sonra pilot uygulamaya geçilmiş ve orijinal form ile Türkçe form her iki dile de hakim ve hedef kitle özelliklerini taşıyan son sınıf İngilizce öğretmen adaylarına sunularak her iki formun arasındaki ilişki irdelenmiştir. Uygulama sonucunda her iki form arasında yüksek düzeyde anlamlı ilişki (r >.70) belirlenmiştir. Bu sebeple geri çeviri sürecine gidilmemiştir. Dil eşdeğerliği sağlanan Türkçe form, aktif olarak görev yapan 177 öğretmene uygulanmış ve toplanan veriler üzerinden doğrulayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda bütün maddelerin faktörler altında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yükler aldığı ve model uyum istatistiklerinden kabul edilebilir uyum aralıklarında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buradan hareketle söz konusu Türkçe formun, Türk kültürü bağlamında teknostresin kaynakları çerçevesinde öğretmenlerin mevcut durumlarını belirlemek amacıyla kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir nitelikte bir ölçek olduğu ifade edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKSÜN, D. O., HASESKİ, H. İ. M., LEYMUN, Ş. O. (2019). The Turkish Adaptation Study of Technostress Resources Scale. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 27, 591–616. https://ajindex.com/articles/141707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agbu, J. O. (2013). Development and validation of technostress rating scale. African Journal of Open and Flexible Learning, 2, 55-74.
  2. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: Sık kullanılan istatistiksel analizler ve açıklamalı SPSS çözümleri. İstanbul:
  3. İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık. Al-Fudail, M. ve Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.
  4. Arbuckle, L. J. (2007). AMOS user’s guide. USA: Amos Development Corporation. Arnetz, B. B. ve Wikholm, C. (1997). Technological stress: Psychophysiological symptoms in modern offices Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(1), 35-42.
  5. Ayyagari, R. (2007). What and why of technostress: Technology antecedents and implications. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Graduate School of Clemson University, USA. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V. ve Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238- 246. Bentler, P.M. ve Bonnet, D.C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
  7. Berger, R., Romeo, M., Gidion, G. ve Poyato, L. (2016). Media use and technostress. 20.06.2018 tarihinde https://www.academia.edu/24322865/MEDIA_USE_AND_TECHNOSTRESS adresinden ulaşılmıştır. Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling: Using SPSS and AMOS. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Booker, Q. E., Rebman Jr, C. M. ve Kitchens, F. L. (2014). A model for testing technostress in the online education environment: An exploratory study. Issues in Information Systems, 15(2), 214-222.
  8. Brillhart, P. E. (2004). Technostress in the workplace managing stress in the electronic workplace. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 302-307.
  9. Brod, C. (1982). Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel Journal, 3, 753-757.
  10. Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. MA: Addison Wesley. Brooks, S., Longstreet, P. ve Califf, C. (2017). Social media induced technostress and its impact on Internet addiction: A distraction-conflict theory perspective. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 99-122.
  11. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (15.