SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 23

The Effect of University Life Quality on Student Engagement and Information Inertia: A Field Study on FEAS Students

Üniversite Yaşam Kalitesinin, Öğrenci Tutkunluğu ve Bilgi Ataleti Üzerine Etkisi: İİBF Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması

Mustafa Taşlıyan(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1141-9846
Salih Yeşil(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3237-2258
Ayşegül Özbağış(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7139-0734
Ayşe Gökyar(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1842-5501
Pages
65–81
Publication Date
2024-02-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The obtained results are discussed in the theoretical and practical context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:University life brings many new things and difficulties such as leaving family and current friends, meeting new people and entering a different environment, acquiring new information Inertia in the learning process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The collected data were analyzed by the SPSS 25.0 package program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The obtained results are discussed in the theoretical and practical context.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üniversite Yaşam Kalitesi · Öğrenci Tutkunluğu · Bilgi Ataleti.

Abstract

University life brings many new things and difficulties such as leaving family and current friends, meeting new people and entering a different environment, acquiring new information Inertia in the learning process. In this context, the aim of the study is to determine the effect of university life quality on student engagement and information inertia. The universe of the research consists of the students of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University. A face-to-face questionnaire was applied to the students with the stratified sampling method. The collected data were analyzed by the SPSS 25.0 package program. The validity and reliability of the scales in the questionnaire were tested. In line with the aims and hypotheses of the study, reliability, frequency, correlation and regression analyzes were performed. According to the analysis result; It has been determined that the quality of university life affects student engagement and information inertia positively, while student engagement negatively affects information inertia. The obtained results are discussed in the theoretical and practical context.

Özet

Üniversite hayatı öğrencilerin aile ve mevcut arkadaş çevresinden ayrılması, yeni insanlarla tanışarak farklı bir çevreye girmesi, yeni bilgiler edinme ve öğrenme sürecinde değişiklikler gibi birçok yenilik ve zorluğu beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite yaşam kalitesinin, öğrenci tutkunluğu ve bilgi ataleti üzerine etkisini saptamaktır. Araştırmanın evrenini, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Öğrencilere tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi ile yüz yüze anket uygulanmıştır. Toplanan veriler SPSS 25.0 paket programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Anket formundaki ölçeklerin geçerlilikleri ve güvenilirlikleri test edilmiştir. Çalışmanın amaç ve hipotezleri doğrultusunda güvenilirlik, frekans, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Analiz sonucuna göre; üniversite yaşam kalitesinin öğrenci tutkunluğunu ve bilgi ataletini pozitif yönde etkilediği belirlenirken öğrenci tutkunluğunun ise bilgi ataletini negatif yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar teorik kapsamda ve uygulama kapsamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taşlıyan, M., Yeşil, S., Özbağış, A., Gökyar, A. (2024). The Effect of University Life Quality on Student Engagement and Information Inertia: A Field Study on FEAS Students. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 23, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1144287

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Abdel - Khalek, A. M. (2010). Quality of life, subjective well-being and religiosity in muslim college students. Quality of Life Research, 19 (8), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9676-7
  2. Albrecht, S.L., Bakker, A.B., Gruman, J.A., Macey, W.H. ve Saks, A.M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7 –35. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-08-2014-0042
  3. Atalay, M. (2013). Kurumsal ataletin yabancılaşma ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Afyonkarahisar. http://hdl.handle.net/11630/2874
  4. Cha, K. H. (2003). Subjective well-being among college students. Social Indicators Research, 62/63, 455-477. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27527104
  5. Clifton, R., Etcheverry, E., Hasinoff, S. ve Roberts, L. (1996). Measuring the cognitive domain of the quality of life of university students. Social Indicators Research, 38(1), 29–52. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00293785
  6. Cohen, E., Clifton, R. A.ve Roberts, L. W. (2001). The cognitive domain of the quality of life of university students: a re-analysis of an instrument. Social Indicators Research, 53(1), 63-77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27526907
  7. Disch, W. B., Harlow, L. L., Campbell, J. F. ve Dougan, T. R. (2000). Student functioning, concerns, and socio-personal well-being. Social Indicators Research, 51 (1), 41–74. http://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007013820439
  8. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.
  9. Evcil Türksever, A.N. (2001). Türkiye’de büyük şehir alanlarında yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir yöntem denemesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İstanbul. https://polen.itu.edu.tr/items/70abfefa-f7e5-4f7c-96f8-fdf876ca435b
  10. Fletcher, A. (2005). Meaningful Student Involvement: Guide to students as partners in school change (2nd Ed.). Olympia, Freechild Project.
  11. Günüç, S. ve Kuzu, A. (2015). Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation İn Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
  12. Kangal, A. (2012). Üniversite yaşam kalitesi ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Akdeniz Üniversitesi, E-İnternational Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), Winter, 16-32.
  13. Kong, C. K. (2008). Classroom learning experiences and students’ perceptions of quality of school life. Learning Environments Research, 11, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9040-9
  14. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
  15. Leonard, C., Bourke, S.,ve Schofield, N. (2003). Affective outcomes in the context of school reform. NZARE/AARE Joint conferance, December, Auckland.
  16. Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C. H., ve Liu, C. H. T. (2008). Relationship between knowledge ınertia, organizational learning and organization ınnovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.005
  17. Linnakylä, P. ve Brunell, V. (1996). Quality of school life in the Finnish and Swedish-speaking schools in Finland. Reading Literacy in an İnternational Perspective içinde (s. 203- 221). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED402570
  18. Michalos, A. C. ve Orlando, J. A. (2006). A note on student quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 79(1), 51-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27522627
  19. Ng, S. L. (2005). Subjective residential environment and its implications for quality of life among university students in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 71(1/3), 467-489. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27522188
  20. Oktik, N. (2004). Huzurevinde yaşam ve yaşam kalitesi (Muğla örneği). Muğla Üniversitesi Yayınları: 52.
  21. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Kaan Kitapevi.
  22. Robertson-Smith, G., ve Markwick, C. (2017). Employee engagement a review of current thinking. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
  23. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. ve Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  24. Sirgy M. J., Grezeskowiak, S. ve Rahtz, D. (2007). Quality of college life (QCL) of students: developing and validating a measure of well- being. Social Indicators Research, 80(2), 343–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-5921-9
  25. Soysal, A. (2010). Atalet: Etkin yönetim için kişisel ve örgütsel düzeyde bir analiz. Çimento İşveren Dergisi, 24(3), 16-26. https://ceis.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2010mayis.pdf
  26. Ünalan, D., Celikten M., Soyuer F. ve Ozturk A. (2008). Quality of life in Turkish university students and its relationship to levels of state-trait anxiety. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(3), 417-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.3.417
  27. Vaez, M., Kristenson, M. ve Laflamme, L. (2004). Perceived quality of life and self-rated health among first-year university students. Social Indicators Research, 68(2), 221-234. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27522115
  28. Yeniçeri, Ö. ve İnce, M. (2005). Bilgi yönetim stratejileri ve girişimcilik. IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık. İstanbul.
  29. Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., Houson, D., Witt, D. ve Diehl, J. (2009). Beyond engagement: Toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 300-326. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1534484309338171