SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 28

The Role of Institutional Quality in the Relationship Between Tax Expenditures and Income Inequality

Vergi Harcamaları ve Gelir Eşitsizliği İlişkisinde Kurumsal Kalitenin Rolü

Uğur Çiçek(MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1357-2561
Pages
902–916
Publication Date
2025-10-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that fiscal policies aimed at reducing the negative impact of tax expenditures on income inequality should be integrated with institutional reforms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyses whether institutional quality has an impact on the relationship between tax expenditure and income distribution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, annual data from ten countries — Germany, the USA, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, France, India, the UK, Canada, and Mexico — for the period 2006–2022 were used, and the panel regression method was applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that fiscal policies aimed at reducing the negative impact of tax expenditures on income inequality should be integrated with institutional reforms.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006–2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:vergi harcamaları · kurumsal kalite · gelir eşitsizliği

Abstract

This study analyses whether institutional quality has an impact on the relationship between tax expenditure and income distribution. To this end, annual data from ten countries — Germany, the USA, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, France, India, the UK, Canada, and Mexico — for the period 2006–2022 were used, and the panel regression method was applied. The dependent variable, income inequality, is measured by the Gini index. Tax expenditure is represented by the share of foregone tax revenues in Gross Domestic Product. The analysis reveals that tax expenditures directly increase income inequality. However, the results differ when institutional quality indicators are included in the model. In countries with strong institutions in areas such as corruption control, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, the rule of law, and democratic accountability, the inequality-increasing effect of tax expenditures weakens. Conversely, this effect reverses and becomes inequality-reducing when political stability is high. The findings suggest that fiscal policies aimed at reducing the negative impact of tax expenditures on income inequality should be integrated with institutional reforms.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, vergi harcamaları ile gelir dağılımı arasındaki ilişkide kurumsal kalite unsurunun etkisinin olup olmadığı incelenmektedir. Bu amaçla 2006–2022 döneminde Almanya, ABD, Arjantin, Avustralya, Brezilya, Fransa, Hindistan, İngiltere, Kanada ve Meksika’dan oluşan on ülkenin yıllık verileri kullanılmış ve panel regresyon yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Gelir eşitsizliği bağımlı değişkeni, Gini endeksi ile ölçülmektedir. Vergi harcaması ise, vazgeçilen vergi gelirlerinin Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla içindeki payı ile temsil edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, vergi harcamalarının doğrudan etkisinin gelir eşitsizliğini artırıcı yönde olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak kurumsal kalite göstergeleri modele dâhil edildiğinde sonuçlar farklılaşmaktadır. Yolsuzluğun kontrolü, hükümet etkinliği, düzenleyici kalite, hukukun üstünlüğü ve demokratik hesap verebilirlik gibi alanlarda güçlü kurumlara sahip ülkelerde vergi harcamalarının eşitsizliği artırıcı etkisi zayıflamakta, siyasi istikrarın yüksek olduğu ortamlarda ise bu etki tersine dönerek eşitsizliği azaltıcı bir işlev kazanmaktadır. Bulgular, vergi harcamalarının gelir eşitsizliği üzerindeki olumsuz etkisini azaltmaya yönelik olarak uygulanacak maliye politikalarının kurumsal reformlarla bütüncül biçimde ele alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çiçek, U. (2025). The Role of Institutional Quality in the Relationship Between Tax Expenditures and Income Inequality. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 28, 902–916. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1771200

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Acemoğlu, D., Johnson, S. ve Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. P. Aghion ve S. N. Durlauf (Ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Volume 1A) içinde (s. 385-472). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
  2. Avram, S., Levy, H. ve Sutherland, H. (2014). Income redistribution in the European Union. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9012-3-22
  3. Baneman, D., Rosenberg, J., Toder, E. ve Williams, R. C. (2012). Curbing tax expenditures. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/curbing-tax-expenditures
  4. Besley, T. ve Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of prosperity: The political economics of development clusters. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840526
  5. Borba, J. S., Gonçalves, S. ve Anteneodo, C. (2025). Inequality in a model of capitalist economy. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 664, 130457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2025.130457
  6. Burman, L., Toder, E. J., Berger, D. ve Rohaly, J. (2017). Economic and distributional effects of tax expenditure limits. A. J. Auerbach ve K. Smetters (Ed.), The Economics of Tax Policy içinde (s. 109-144). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190619725.003.0008
  7. Burman, L.,E., Christopher G. ve Eric J. T. (2008). How big are total individual income tax expenditures, and who benefits from them?. American Economic Review, 98(2). 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.79
  8. Chong, A. ve Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. The review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.454
  9. Clausing, K. A. (2020). Taxing multinational companies in the 21st Century. J. Shambaugh ve R. Nunn (Ed.), Tackling the tax code: Efficient and equitable ways to raise revenue içinde (s. 237-283). https://www.brookings.edu/articles/taxing-multinational-companies-in-the-21st-century/
  10. Coady, D., Gillingham, R., Ossowski, R., Piotrowski, J., Tareq, S. ve Tyson, J. (2010). Petroleum product subsidies: costly, inequitable, and rising. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/spn/2010/spn1005.pdf
  11. Driscoll, J. C. ve Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  12. Figari, F. ve Paulus, A. (2015). The distributional effects of taxes and transfers under alternative income concepts: The importance of three “I”s. Public Finance Review, 43(3), 347-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142113506930
  13. Global Tax Expenditures Database (GTED). (2025, 6 Nisan). Comprehensive tax expenditure data to increase transparency and advance reforms. Global Tax Expenditures Database. https://gted.taxexpenditures.org/
  14. Goñi, E., López, J. H. ve Servén, L. (2011). Fiscal redistribution and income inequality in Latin America. World Development, 39(9), 1558-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.025
  15. Gupta, S., Davoodi, H. ve Alonso-Terme, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?. Economics of Governance, 3(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100039
  16. Immervoll, H. ve L. Richardson (2011). Redistribution policy and inequality reduction in OECD Countries: What has changed in two decades?. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. No. 122, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg5dlkhjq0x-en
  17. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. ve Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
  18. Koç, O. E., Saraç, T. B., Koç, N. ve Çiçek, U. (2024). The effects of taxes on income distribution justice. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 14(6), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.17362
  19. Martinez-Vazquez, J., Moreno-Dodson, B. ve Vulovic, V. (2012). The impact of tax and expenditure policies on income distribution: Evidence from a large panel of countries. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series, No.12-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2188608
  20. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Tax expenditures in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264076907-en
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Taxation and Inequality: OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/8dbf9a62-en
  23. Prammer, D. (2011). Taxation papers - Quality of taxation and the crisis: Tax shifts from a growth perspective. Working Paper No 29. Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2778/29300
  24. Redonda, A., Millan, L., Von Haldenwang, C., Berg, S. ve Aliu, F. (2024). Global tax expenditures transparency index (GTETI) companion paper. German Institute of Development and Sustainability. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/3m1kpna
  25. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. ve Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
  26. Ross, J. (2018). Tax expenditures and inequality in Latin America. International Budget Partnership. https://internationalbudget.org/publications/tax-expenditures-and-inequality-latin-america/
  27. Surrey, S. S. (1973). Pathways to tax reform: The concept of tax expenditures. Harvard University Press. The Joint Committee on Taxation. (2008). A reconsideration of tax expenditure analysis. The Joint Committee on Taxation, JCX-37-08. https://www.jct.gov/publications/2008/jcx-37-08/
  28. The Joint Committee on Taxation. (2025). Estimates of Federal tax expenditures for fiscal years 2024–2033. JCX-36-25. https://www.jct.gov/publications/2025/jcx-36-25/
  29. Thuronyi, V. (1988). Tax expenditures: A reassessment. Duke Law Journal, 1155-1206. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol37/iss6/2
  30. Tyson, J. (2014). Reforming tax expenditures in Italy: What, why, and how?. IMF Working Paper WP/14/7. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1407.pdf
  31. United Nations (UN). (2013). Inequality matters: Report of the World Social Situation 2013. United Nations, Economic and Social Affairs ST/ESA/345. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/reports/InequalityMatters.pdf
  32. World Bank, (2025, 6 Nisan). Worldwide governance indicators. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
  33. Zee, H. H. (2005). Personal income tax reform: Concepts, issues, and comparative country developments. IMF Working Paper No. 05/87. https://ssrn.com/abstract=888133
  34. Zee, H. H., Stotsky, J. G. ve Ley, E. (2002). Tax incentives for business investment: A primer for policy makers in developing countries. World Development, 30(9), 1497-1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00050-5
  35. Zodrow, G. R. (2003). Tax competition and tax coordination in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance,10, 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026377819946
  36. Zucman, G. (2015). The hidden wealth of nations: The scourge of tax havens. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226245560.001.0001