Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Prosthetic rehabilition of unknown dental implants: A case report

Markası bilinmeyen dental implantların protetik rehabilitasyonu: Olgu sunumu

Pages
95–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No complications were observed during the 8-month follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, rehabilitation of dental implants with fixed prosthetic restorations in cases with partial or total tooth deficiency has been successfully used to increase the stabilization and function of the prosthesis, reduce patient discomfort and thus improve patient satisfaction and quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this case, the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient, attended to Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics, with complaints of implant-retained crown looseness, was reported.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No complications were observed during the 8-month follow-up.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays, rehabilitation of dental implants with fixed prosthetic restorations in cases with partial or total tooth deficiency has been successfully used to increase the stabilization and function of the prosthesis, reduce patient discomfort and thus improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. In this case, the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient, attended to Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics, with complaints of implant-retained crown looseness, was reported. After oral and radiographic examinations were completed, it was decided to renew the existing bridges both in the lower and upper jaws. The information obtained from the patient, interviews with the dentist performed the previous treatments, intraoral photographs and radiographic images of the implants were searched for which brand the implants belong to, but no results were obtained. Therefore, different treatment options were offered to the patient and their advantages and disadvantages were explained. Since there was no chance of changing the implant abutments of unknown brand, it was decided to reuse the existing abutments by revising and preparing them in the mouth, taking impressions and constructing new porcelain-fused to metal crowns. The restorations were completed by conventional methods, cemented on the abutments and aesthetic, function and satisfaction of the patient were met. No complications were observed during the 8-month follow-up.

Özet

Günümüzde dental implantların kısmi ya da total diş eksikliği bulunan vakalarda sabit protetik restorasyonlar ile rehabilitasyonu, protezin stabilizasyonunu ve fonksiyonunu artırmak, hastanın rahatsızlığını azaltmak ve dolayısıyla hasta memnuniyetini ve yaşam kalitesini arttırmak amacıyla başarılı bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu olgu sunumunda Yeditepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı’na, implant destekli köprü protezlerinin devamlı düşmesi şikayeti ile başvuran bir hastanın protetik tedavisi anlatılmaktadır. Hastanın ağız içi muayenesi ve radyografik incelemesi tamamlandıktan sonra, alt ve üst çenede var olan köprü protezlerinin yenilenmesine karar verilmiştir. Hastadan alınan bilgiler, eski tedavilerini gerçekleştiren diş hekimi ile yapılan görüşmeler, ağız içi fotoğraflar ve radyografideki implant görüntüleri ile birlikte implantların hangi markaya ait olduğu arayışına girilmiş, ancak bir sonuç elde edilememiştir. Bu nedenle hastaya farklı tedavi seçenekleri sunulmuş, bunların avantaj ve dezavantajları anlatılmıştır. Sonuç olarak markası bilinmeyen implant abutmentlarının değiştirilme şansı olmadığından, var olan abutmentların ağız içerisinde revize edilerek kullanımının devamına, abutmentların ağız içerisinde prepare edilerek üzerlerinden ölçü alınmasına ve devamında sabit metal destekli porselen köprülerin yapılmasına karar verilmiştir. Konvansiyonel yöntemle tamamlanan restorasyonlar abutmentlar üzerine simante edilmiş, hastanın estetik, fonksiyon ve memnuniyet beklentileri karşılanmıştır. Hastanın 8 aylık takibinde herhangi bir komplikasyona rastlanmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAMİTOĞLU, B., KAYAHAN, Z. Ö. (2020). Prosthetic rehabilition of unknown dental implants: A case report. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 95–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/141560

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Tunalı B. Multi-Disipliner Bir Yaklaşımla Oral İmplantolojiye Giriş. İstanbul: İstanbul Universitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakultesi Yayınları; 1996
  2. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 10-92
  3. Misch CE, Bidez MW. A scientific rationale for dental implant design, Contemporary implant denstry. 2th ed., St. Louis, Mosby; 2005
  4. Koenisberger R. Churchill's illustrated medical dictionary. Churchill Livingston, New York; 1989
  5. Callan DP, O‘Mahony A, Cobb CM. Loss of crestal bone around dental implants: a retrospective study. J Implant Dent 1998; 7: 258-66
  6. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 527-51
  7. Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implantsupported fixed dental restorations: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 697- 711
  8. Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: A clinical case report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2008; 23: 943-6
  9. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L, Apse P. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 1179-84
  10. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excesscement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1999; 14: 865-8
  11. Wilson TG. The positive relationship between excess cement and periimplant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. Journal of Periodontology 2009; 80: 1388-92
  12. Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 112-4
  13. Hess TA. A technique to eliminate subgingival cement adhesion to implant abutments by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 365-8
  14. Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cementretained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1379-84
  15. Present S, Levine RA. Techniques to control or avoid cement around implantretained restorations. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 2013; 34: 432-7. 1