Journals / Androloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of the effect of age factor on semen values in 2866 semen analysis report

2866 Semen analiz raporunda, yaş faktörünün semen değerleri üzerine olası etkisinin araştırılması

Pages
90–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Concentration and total sperm count did not change according to age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of the increasing age of men on volume, concentration and progressive motility of semen parameters and the role of them on male infertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2866 semen analysis of 2088 male patients who admitted to an andrology laboratory of a training and research hospital between 2007–2009 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Concentration and total sperm count did not change according to age.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2088 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of the increasing age of men on volume, concentration and progressive motility of semen parameters and the role of them on male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2866 semen analysis of 2088 male patients who admitted to an andrology laboratory of a training and research hospital between 2007–2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The relation between increasing age of men and volume, concentration, total sperm count and progressive motility were evaluated. The first group (21–30 years old), second group (41–50 years old) and third group consisted of 1590, 1118 and 158 semen analysis, respectively. RESULTS: The volume of the semen was determined in groups as 2.67±1.37 mL, 2.75±1.38 mL, 2.31±1.21 mL respectively. The volume was significantly lower in the third group when compared to both the first and second groups (p=0.001). Total progressive motility was higher in first group (% 52.94±3.90), according to the second group (% 52.46±3.50) (p=0.01). Concentration and total sperm count were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Semen volume was lower in men over 40 years old. Total progressive motility was higher in men under 30 years old. Concentration and total sperm count did not change according to age.

Özet

AMAÇ: Erkeklerde yaş artışının, semen parametrelerinden hacim, konsantrasyon ve progresif motilite üzerine etkisinin araştırılması ve bunun erkek infertilitesindeki yerinin belirlenmesi. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: 2007–2009 yılları arasında hastanemiz infertilite polikliniğine başvuran kadına bağlı infertilitesi olan çiftlerden sağlıklı eşe ait 2866 semen analizinin; yaş artışı ile hacim, mililitredeki spermatozoa sayısı (konsantrasyon), toplam spermatozoa sayısı ve progresif motilitenin ilişkisi retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar yaşa göre üç grupta toplandı. 1. grup (21–30 yaş): 1590 analiz, 2. grup (31–40 yaş): 1118 analiz, 3. grup (41–50 yaş): 158 analiz incelendi. BULGULAR: Yaş gruplarına göre semen hacim değerleri; 1. grup 2,67±1,37 mL, 2. grup 2,75±1,38 mL, 3. grup 2,31±1,21 mL olarak bulundu. 1. grup ile 3. grup ve 2. grup ile 3. grup kıyaslandığında fark anlamlı bulundu (p=0,001). Grup 1’in toplam progresif motilite oranı (%52,94±3,90), 2. gruba (%52,46±3,50) göre yüksek bulundu (p=0,01). Konsantrasyon ve toplam spermatozoa sayısı gruplar arasında fark göstermedi. SONUÇ: Toplam progresif motilite 30 yaş altında daha yüksek bulundu. Konsantrasyon ve toplam spermatozoa sayısı ise yaşla değişiklik göstermedi. Ancak semen hacmi 40 yaş üzerindeki erkeklerde, 40 yaş altına kıyasla azalma gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, E. K., KERVANCIOĞLU, G., YILDIRIM, Ş., YILDIRIM, G. Y., POLAT, İ. (2020). Investigation of the effect of age factor on semen values in 2866 semen analysis report. Androloji Bülteni, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 90–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/141487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2003. National vital statistics reports 2005;54:1-116
  2. Kuhnert B, Nieschiag E. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:327–39. [CrossRef] 3. Sartarius GA, Nieschlag E. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:65–79. [CrossRef] 4. Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2001;75:237–48. [CrossRef] 5. Kovac JR, Addai J, Smith RP, Coward RM, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. The effects of advanced paternal age on fertility. Asian J Androl 2013;15:723–28. [CrossRef] 6. Sloter E, Schmid TE, Marchetti F, Eskenazi B, Nath J, Wyrobek AJ. Quantitative effects of male age on sperm motion. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2868–75. [CrossRef] 7. Durchschnittliches Heiratsalter nach dem bisherigen Familienstand der Ehepartner. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel. Statistisches Bundesamt (ed) 2003. p.70
  3. Bray I, Gunnell D, Smith G. Advanced paternal age: how old is too old? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:851–3. [CrossRef] 9. Mostafa T. Cigarette smoking and male infertility. J Adv Res 2010;1:179–186. [CrossRef] 10. Ragheb AM, Sabanegh Jr ES. Smoking and male fertility: a contemporary review. Arch Med Sci 2009;5:S13–9. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/242074254_Smoking_and_male_ fertility_A_contemporary_review 11. Toksöz S, Kızılkan Y. Yerli popülasyon ve mülteci hasta gruplarında azospermi oranları ve etkileyen faktörler. Androl Bul 2019;21:45– 9. [CrossRef] 12. Gökçe A, Gül D, Direk HC, Çimen Hİ, Halis F. Cinsel perhiz süresi ve semen parametreleri arasındaki ilişki. Androl Bul 2018;20:11–5. [CrossRef] 13. Hammiche F, Laven JSE, Boxmeer JC, Dohle GR, Steegers EAP, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Sperm Quality Decline Among Men Below 60 Years of Age Undergoing IVF or ICSI Treatment. J Androl 2011;32:70–6. [CrossRef] 14. Homonnai ZT, Fainman N, David MP, Paz GF. Semen quality and sex hormone pattern of 39 middle aged men. Andrologia 1982;14:164–70. [CrossRef] 15. Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ, Sloter E, Kidd SA, Moore L, Young S, Moore D. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod 2003;18:447–54. [CrossRef] 16. Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH. Semen analyses in 1, 283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality. Fertil Steril