Journals / International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Investigation of the Bending Behavior of Scots Pine Wood at Cryogenic Temperatures

Didem Verep Koç(BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GENÇ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-1013-9212
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, cryogenic treatments applied to Scots pine wood intended for low-temperature applications can enhance its mechanical properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, conducted with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood samples, the bending strength behavior of the wood under the effects of room temperature and cryogenic temperature (-196 °C) was tested and examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the experiments conducted, the bending strength of wood samples in a cryogenic environment was approximately 34% higher than that of the control group of Scots pine wood samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, cryogenic treatments applied to Scots pine wood intended for low-temperature applications can enhance its mechanical properties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) · Cryogenic temperature · Liquid nitrogen

Abstract

In this study, conducted with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood samples, the bending strength behavior of the wood under the effects of room temperature and cryogenic temperature (-196 °C) was tested and examined. Air-dried pine samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen for ten minutes to create cryogenic conditions. The wood samples exposed to cryogenic temperatures were immediately subjected to a three-point bending test after the process, before the pine wood samples returned to the ambient temperature. The bending strength of the pine samples in the control group was tested at room temperature. As a result of the experiments conducted, the bending strength of wood samples in a cryogenic environment was approximately 34% higher than that of the control group of Scots pine wood samples. According to the force-strain curve graph obtained from the numerical data, the wood samples exhibited lower deformation and higher rigidity at cryogenic temperatures. At room temperature, the wood samples exhibited more ductile behavior. Cryogenic conditions increased the bending strength and rigidity of Scots pine wood samples. Therefore, cryogenic treatments applied to Scots pine wood intended for low-temperature applications can enhance its mechanical properties.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, D. V. (2026). Investigation of the Bending Behavior of Scots Pine Wood at Cryogenic Temperatures. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.1844580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. M. D. Ghalehno, D. Chu, N. B. Sheshkal, M. Humar, and M. Bahmani, “Effect of Heat Treatment on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Oriental Beech Wood (Fagus orientalis L.),” in The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Sweden, Nov. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355479180
  2. O. A. Hegeir, T. Kvande, H. Stamatopoulos, and R. A. Bohne, “Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Timber, Steel and Reinforced Concrete Portal Frames: A Theoretical Study on a Norwegian Industrial Building,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 5, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12050573.
  3. D. Schenk and A. Amiri, “Life cycle energy analysis of residential wooden buildings versus concrete and steel buildings: A review,” Front Built Environ, vol. 8, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.975071.
  4. F. Arriaga, X. Wang, G. Íñiguez-González, D. F. Llana, M. Esteban, and P. Niemz, “Mechanical Properties of Wood: A Review,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 6, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14061202.
  5. G. Gündüz, Z. Bartın, and O. Fakültesi, “Ahşap Korumada Rutubet İzoterm Eğrileri Haritası: Türkiye Örneği,” ZKÜ Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 26–33, 2007.
  6. R. Hasanagić, L. Fathi, A. Hodžić, and M. Bahmani, “Physical and mechanical changes in thermal modified wood: A review,” Materials Protection, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 314–326, 2023, doi: 10.5937/zasmat2303314H.
  7. Z. E. Özan, S. M. Onat, and D. Aydemi̇r, “Sarıçam ve Uludağ Göknar Odunlarının Bazı Özellikleri Üzerine Termal Muamelenin Etkileri,” Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry Geliş, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 187–193, 2017, doi: 10.24011/barofd.313318.
  8. Z. Fu, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, F. Xie, and Y. Lu, “Review on Wood Deformation and Cracking during Moisture Loss,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 1–14, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15153295.
  9. Y. Tian et al., “Improvement of dimensional stability, UV and decay resistance of wood through impregnation with carboxylated sucrose prepared by a green route,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 440, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137476.
  10. M. Fredriksson, “On wood-water interactions in the over-hygroscopic moisture range-mechanisms, methods, and influence of wood modification,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–16, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3390/f10090779.
  11. R. Sargent, “Evaluating dimensional stability in solid wood: a review of current practice,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 65, no. 1, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s10086-019-1817-1.
  12. H. H. Ciritcioğlu and E. Pamukçu, “Sığ Kriyojenik İşlemin Sarıçam (Pinus sylvestris L.) Odunu Eğilme Direnci ve Elastikiyet Modülü Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2516–2527, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.29130/dubited.670380.
  13. G. Köse Demirel and A. Temiz, “Ahşap Korumada Çevre Dostu Modifikasyon Yöntemleri,” Selçuk Teknik Dergisi, pp. 1016–1032, Apr. 2015.
  14. D. Jones and D. Sandberg, “A Review of Wood Modification Globally – Updated Findings from COST FP1407,” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Built Environment, vol. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.37947/ipbe.2020.vol1.1.
  15. M. Boonstra, “A two-stage thermal modification of wood,” Belgium, 2008.
  16. Ş. Kılınçarslan and Y. Şimşek Türker, “Ahşap Malzemelerin Islanabilirlik Özelliği Üzerine Isıl İşlem Uygulamasının Etkisi,” Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 460–466, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.21923/jesd.570067.
  17. Z. Ong et al., “Advances in Wood Preservation Technology: A Review of Conventional and Nanotechnology Preservation Approaches,” Bioresources, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 8209–8255, 2025.
  18. F. Nhacila, E. Sitoe, E. Uetimane, A. Manhica, A. Egas, and V. Möttönen, “Effects of thermal modification on physical and mechanical properties of Mozambican Brachystegia spiciformis and Julbernardia globiflora wood,” European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 871–878, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00107-020-01576-z.
  19. V. Jirouš-Rajković and J. Miklečić, “Enhancing weathering resistance of wood—a review,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1980–2006, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/polym13121980.
  20. S. Ayan and H. H. Ciritcioğlu, “Isıl İşlemin Ahşap Lamine Panellerin Bazı Fiziksel Özellikleri ve Vida Tutma Dayanımına Etkisinin Belirlenmesi,” Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2012.
  21. X. Ma, M. Jiang, Y. Wu, and P. Wang, “Effect of Wood Surface Treatment on Fungal Decay and Termite Resistance,” Bioresources, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2366–2375, 2013.
  22. V. Jančíková and M. Jablonský, “Thermal Modification of Wood—A Review,” Sustainable Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 19–41, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/suschem6030019.
  23. B. M. Esteves and H. M. Pereira, “Wood Modification by Heat Treatment: A Review,” Bioresources, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 370–404, 2009.
  24. A. Aytin, İ. Uygur, T. Demirci, and İ. Akgül, “The Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on Some Chemical, Physical, and Mechanical Properties of Thermowood® Oriental Spruce,” Bioresources, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 6983–6996, 2022, doi: 10.15376/biores.17.4.6983-6996.
  25. J. Y. Huang, Y. T. Zhu, X. Z. Liao, I. J. Beyerlein, M. A. Bourke, and T. E. Mitchell, “Microstructure of cryogenic treated M2 tool steel,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 339, no. 1–2, pp. 241–244, 2003, [Online]. Available: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
  26. A. Akhbarizadeh, A. Shafyei, and M. A. Golozar, “Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel,” Mater Des, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 3259–3264, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.016.
  27. O. E. Özkan, “Effects of cryogenic temperature on some mechanical properties of beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) wood,” European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 417–421, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00107-020-01639-1.
  28. L. Zhao, J. Jiang, J. Lu, and T. Zhan, “Flexural property of wood in low temperature environment,” Cold Reg Sci Technol, vol. 116, pp. 65–69, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.04.001.
  29. M. Oncel and O. E. Ozkan, “Effect of Ultra-Low Temperature on Some Mechanical Properties of Painted and Film-Coated Plywood,” Maderas: Ciencia y Tecnologia, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.4067/s0718-221x2023000100422.
  30. X. Jiang, W. Wang, Y. Guo, and M. Dai, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Effect of Low Temperature on the Properties of Lignocellulosic Amorphous Region,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1208–1220, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14061208.
  31. M. Kherais, A. Csébfalvi, A. Len, A. Fülöp, and J. Pál-Schreiner, “The effect of moisture content on the mechanical properties of wood structure,” Pollack Periodica, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 41–46, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1556/606.2023.00917.