Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Geometric Analysis of Digital Aerial Images

Lütfiye Karasaka(Selçuk University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geomatic Engineering)
Hakan Karabörk(Selçuk University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Geomatic Engineering)
Ahmet Güntel(Mescioglu Engineering and Consultancy Inc)
Fatih Esirtgen(Mescioglu Engineering and Consultancy Inc)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-03-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been compared the residuals of coordinates and RMS of ground control points and check points triangulated image blocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The data produced by photogrammetric methods have become used more effectively and efficiently to take place of digital aerial cameras to aerial film cameras.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since 2000, many studies have been done upon the geometric analysis of the rapidly developing digital imaging system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been compared the residuals of coordinates and RMS of ground control points and check points triangulated image blocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Analysis · Aerial Cameras Aerial Triangulation · Check Points

Abstract

The data produced by photogrammetric methods have become used more effectively and efficiently to take place of digital aerial cameras to aerial film cameras. Digital aerial cameras have distinct properties according to imaging geometry, sensor numbers, the placement of camera cones and image recording techniques. Since 2000, many studies have been done upon the geometric analysis of the rapidly developing digital imaging system. Intergraph DMC and Vexcel Ultracam are among the most popular digital imaging systems in this area. These cameras are large-format digital aerial camera systems. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the geometric performance of DMCII-250e and Vexcel UltraCamX large-format digital aerial camera systems. The test flights were performed in Bursa province. Two different image blocks which are 10 cm GSD and 30 cm GSD were acquired at different flight altitudes. The image measurements for aerial triangulation were performed by Mescioglu Engineering Inc. The images were processed with Match-AT software. It has been compared the residuals of coordinates and RMS of ground control points and check points triangulated image blocks.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karasaka, L., Karabörk, H., Güntel, A., Esirtgen, F. (2017). Geometric Analysis of Digital Aerial Images. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.306491

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Cramer, M., Stallmann, D., and Haala, N., 2002, Direct georeferencing using GPS/Inertial exterior orientations for photogrammetric applications, IASPRS, Vol.XXXIII, Amsterdam
  2. Doğan, E., Gazioğlu, C., Okuş, E., Gönenç, IE., Yüce, H and Yücel, ZY. (1998): Examination of the Pollution in the West Black Sea By Remote Sensing Technologies, Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, Vol:4(2):89-101.
  3. Gruber M., Ponticelli M., Bernögger S., and Leberl F., 2008, UltracamX the large format digital aerial camera system by Vexcel Imaging Microsoft, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B1. Beijing 2008
  4. Skaloud, J., and Legat, K., 2008, Theory and reality of direct georeferencing in national coordinates, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol.63, pp.272-282
  5. Yuan, X., 2008, A novel method of systematic error compensation for a position and orientation, Progress in Natural Science, vol. 18, pp. 953-963
  6. Yuan, X.,Fu, J., Sun, H., and Toth, C., 2009, The application of GPS precise point positioning technology in aerial triangulation, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64 (2009)pp.541-550