SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Post-Flood Response Analysis Using GIS and Remote Sensing: The Case of Karaköy Neighborhood in Elmalı District

Serkan Sabancı(SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0002-6008-5213
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results aim to contribute to the development of localized, hydro-climatologically and geomorphodynamically informed rural flood risk reduction frameworks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the flood and debris flow events that occurred on August 6–7, 2018, in the rural areas of Elmalı district, Antalya, within a climatological, geomorphological, and anthropogenic framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The disaster, particularly concentrated in Karaköy, was triggered by intense short-term rainfall that caused surface runoff from steep slopes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results aim to contribute to the development of localized, hydro-climatologically and geomorphodynamically informed rural flood risk reduction frameworks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Flood · Debris Flow · Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Abstract

This study examines the flood and debris flow events that occurred on August 6–7, 2018, in the rural areas of Elmalı district, Antalya, within a climatological, geomorphological, and anthropogenic framework. The disaster, particularly concentrated in Karaköy, was triggered by intense short-term rainfall that caused surface runoff from steep slopes. The geological structure of the area, the establishment of settlements on alluvial fans, high slope gradients, vegetation scarcity, and the overlap of water flow paths with residential zones significantly intensified the disaster's impact. The research utilized datasets from the Turkish State Meteorological Service (TSMS), State Hydraulic Works (DSİ), and local authorities. Topographic and spatial analyses were conducted using ASTER and Landsat 8 satellite imagery through ArcMap 10.2.2 software. Post-disaster mitigation involved constructing four check dams by DSİ to control sediment transport and redirecting the streambed away from the settlement area. Rainfall data on the disaster date confirmed that precipitation exceeded monthly averages and caused a high discharge in a very short time. The findings demonstrate that when rural settlements are established on high-risk geomorphological formations like alluvial cones without adequate planning, the severity of natural disasters significantly increases. The study emphasizes the necessity of reevaluating current strategies, aligning rural land-use policies with topographic risk assessments, and integrating non-structural measures into disaster management. These results aim to contribute to the development of localized, hydro-climatologically and geomorphodynamically informed rural flood risk reduction frameworks.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sabancı, S. (2025). Post-Flood Response Analysis Using GIS and Remote Sensing: The Case of Karaköy Neighborhood in Elmalı District. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Volume: 12 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1413083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Alfieri, L., Bisselink, B., Dottori, F., Naumann, G., De Roo, A., Salamon, P.,. & Feyen, L. (2017). Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth’s Future, 5(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000485
  2. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2005). Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature, 438(7066), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141
  3. Benavides-Solorio, J., & MacDonald, L. H. (2001). Post-fire runoff and erosion from simulated rainfall on small plots, Colorado Front Range. Hydrological Processes, 15(15), 2931–2952. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.383
  4. Cama, M., Lombardo, L., Conoscenti, C., & Rotigliano, E. (2017). Improving transferability strategies for debris flow susceptibility assessment: Application to the Saponara and Itala catchments (Messina, Italy). Geomorphology, 288, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.025
  5. Cerdà, A., & Doerr, S. H. (2005). The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period. Catena, 61(3–4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.03.006
  6. Conoscenti, C., Rotigliano, E., Cama, M., Caraballo-Arias, N. A., Lombardo, L., & Agnesi, V. (2016). Exploring the effect of absence selection on landslide susceptibility models: A case study in Sicily, Italy. Geomorphology, 261, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.006
  7. Demuth, S., Gustard, A., Planos, E., & Servat, E. (2023). Climate variability and change—hydrological impacts. International Association of Hydrological Sciences. ISBN: 978-1-901502-78-7
  8. Dragovich, D., & Morris, R. (2002). Fire intensity, slopewash and bio-transfer of sediment on oxidic soils in eucalypt forest near Sydney, Australia. Catena, 49(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00014-7
  9. Fancini, F., Luino, F., Paliaga, G., Roccati, A., & Turconi, L. (2021). Flash flood events along the West Mediterranean coasts: Inundations of urbanized areas conditioned by anthropic impacts. Land, 10(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060620
  10. Ford, D., & Williams, P. (2007). Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118684986
  11. Garcés, A., Zegers Cabré, A., Aguilar, G., Tamburrino, A., & Montserrat, S. (2022). A modeling methodology to study the tributary-junction alluvial fan connectivity during a debris flow event. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22(2), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-377-2022
  12. Giannecchini, R. (2005). Rainfall triggering soil slips in the southern Apuan Alps (Tuscany, Italy). Advances in Geosciences, 2, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-2-21-2005
  13. Gonzalez, D. P., Ruiz-Bellet, J. L., Balasch, J. C., & Castelltort, X. (2016). Meteorological and hydrological analysis of major floods in NE Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.008
  14. Gutiérrez, F., Parise, M., De Waele, J., & Jourde, H. (2014). A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth-Science Reviews, 138, 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.002
  15. Holgate, C. M., Pepler, A. S., Rudeva, I., & Abram, N. J. (2023). Anthropogenic warming reduces the likelihood of drought-breaking extreme rainfall events in southeast Australia. Weather and Climate Extremes, 42, 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100607
  16. Klein, G., Vitasse, Y., Rixen, C., Marty, C., & Rebetez, M. (2016). Shorter snow cover duration since 1970 in the Swiss Alps due to earlier snowmelt more than to later snow onset. Climatic Change, 139(3), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1806-y
  17. Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2018). Quo vadis, hydrology? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(8), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1489597
  18. Lookingbill, T. R., & Urban, D. L. (2003). Spatial estimation of air temperature differences for landscape-scale studies in montane environments. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 114(3–4), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00198-9
  19. Marchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., & Gaume, E. (2010). Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. Journal of Hydrology, 394(1–2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017
  20. Merz, B., Elmer, F., & Thieken, A. H. (2009). Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9, 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1033-2009
  21. Moore, I. D., & Burch, G. J. (1986). Physical basis of the length–slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50(5), 1294–1298. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000050042x
  22. Morley, C. K., von Hagke, C., Hansberry, R. L., Collins, A. S., Kanitpanyacharoen, W., & King, R. (2017). Review of major shale-dominated detachment and thrust characteristics in the diagenetic zone: Part I, meso- and macro-scopic scale. *Earth-Science Reviews, 173, 168–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.019
  23. Pasuto, A., Marchi, L., & Tecca, P. R. (1993). Flow processes on alluvial fans in the Eastern Italian Alps. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Supplementary Issues, 37(4), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1127/zfg/37/1993/447
  24. Prosser, I. P., & Williams, L. (1998). The effect of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest. Hydrological Processes, 12(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199802)12:2 3.0.CO;2-4
  25. Regmi, N. R., Giardino, J. R., & Vitek, J. D. (2010). Assessing susceptibility to landslides: Using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology, 122(1–2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.05.009
  26. Schaefer, M. L., Bogacki, V., Caceres, M. L. L., Kirschbauer, L., Kato, C., & Kikuchi, S. (2024). Influence of slope aspect and vegetation on the soil moisture response to snowmelt in the German Alps. Hydrology, 11(7), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11070101
  27. Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A.,. & Malik, A. (2021). Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
  28. Shakesby, R. A., & Doerr, S. H. (2006). Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent. Earth-Science Reviews, 74(3–4), 269–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006
  29. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2023). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2023. https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-2023
  30. Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., & Shepherd, T. G. (2011). Attribution of climate extreme events. Nature Climate Change, 1(6), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1452
  31. Alfieri, L., Bisselink, B., Dottori, F., Naumann, G., De Roo, A., Salamon, P.,. & Feyen, L. (2017). Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth’s Future, 5(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000485
  32. Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A.,. & Malik, A. (2021). Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/