SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2026 / Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Integration of custom street view and low-cost motion sensors

Tolga Bakirman(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7828-9666
Mustafa Umit Gumusay0000-0001-6464-919X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed system can be implemented for virtual museums, heritage sites or planetariums consisting of panoramic images.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Virtual reality is an artificial computer-generated environment generally referred as virtual reality environment which can be navigated and interacted with by a user.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Street View, which was released by Google in 2007, is an ideal tool to discover places and locations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed system can be implemented for virtual museums, heritage sites or planetariums consisting of panoramic images.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Street View · Kinect · Virtual Reality

Abstract

Virtual reality is an artificial computer-generated environment generally referred as virtual reality environment which can be navigated and interacted with by a user. Street View, which was released by Google in 2007, is an ideal tool to discover places and locations. This service doesn’t only provide spatial information, but also a virtual reality environment for the user. Since this service is only available in certain locations, Google enables users to create a street view with custom panoramic images with the help of Google Maps Application Programming Interface (API) for JavaScript. In this study, it is aimed to integrate body motions with a custom created street view service for Yildiz Technical University Davutpasa Campus which has a historical environment and huge places to discover. Microsoft Kinect for Xbox 360 motion sensor along with Flexible Action and Articulated Skeleton Toolkit (FAAST) interface has been employed for this purpose. This integration provides a low-cost alternative for virtual reality experience. The proposed system can be implemented for virtual museums, heritage sites or planetariums consisting of panoramic images.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bakirman, T., Gumusay, M. U. (2020). Integration of custom street view and low-cost motion sensors. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Volume: 5 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.589489

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Akcay, O., Erenoglu, R. C., & Avsar, E. O. (2017). The Effect of JPEG Compression in Close Range Photogrammetry. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(1), 35-40. doi: 10.26833/ijeg.287308
  2. Amiri Parian, J., & Gruen, A. (2010). Sensor modeling, self-calibration and accuracy testing of panoramic cameras and laser scanners. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 60-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.08.005
  3. Anguelov, D., Dulong, C., Filip, D., Frueh, C., Lafon, S., Lyon, R.,. Weaver, J. (2010). Google Street View: Capturing the World at Street Level. Computer, 43(6), 32-38. doi: 10.1109/MC.2010.170
  4. Bakirman, T., Gumusay, M. U., Reis, H. C., Selbesoglu, M. O., Yosmaoglu, S., Yaras, M. C.,. Bayram, B. (2017). Comparison of low cost 3D structured light scanners for face modeling. Applied Optics, 56(4), 985-992. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.000985
  5. Chapman, D., & Deacon, A. (1998). Panoramic imaging and virtual reality — filling the gaps between the lines. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(6), 311-319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00016-1
  6. Curtis, J. W., Curtis, A., Mapes, J., Szell, A. B., & Cinderich, A. (2013). Using google street view for systematic observation of the built environment: analysis of spatio-temporal instability of imagery dates. International Journal of Health Geographics, 12(1), 53. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-53
  7. Fangi, G., & Nardinocchi, C. (2013). Photogrammetric Processing of Spherical Panoramas. The Photogrammetric Record, 28(143), 293-311. doi: 10.1111/phor.12031
  8. Freedman, B., Shpunt, A., Machline, M., & Arieli, Y. (2013). Depth mapping using projected patterns: Google Patents.
  9. Google. (2019). Where we’ve been. Retrieved 11.06.2019, from https://www.google.com/streetview/explore/
  10. Gutierrez, M., Vexo, F., & Thalmann, D. (2008). Stepping into virtual reality: Springer Science & Business Media.
  11. Hanson, C. S., Noland, R. B., & Brown, C. (2013). The severity of pedestrian crashes: an analysis using Google Street View imagery. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 42-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.002
  12. Isikdag, U. (2020) An IoT Architecture for Facilitating Integration of GeoInformation. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 5(1), 15-25. doi: 10.26833/ijeg.587023
  13. Izadi, S., Kim, D., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Newcombe, R., Kohli, P.,. Fitzgibbon, A. (2011). KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
  14. Kelly, C. M., Wilson, J. S., Baker, E. A., Miller, D. K., & Schootman, M. (2012). Using Google Street View to Audit the Built Environment: Inter-rater Reliability Results. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(suppl_1), S108-S112. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9419-9
  15. Le Yaouanc, J.-M., Saux, É., & Claramunt, C. (2010). A semantic and language-based representation of an environmental scene. GeoInformatica, 14(3), 333-352. doi: 10.1007/s10707-010-0103-6
  16. Point-Grey. (2014). Overview of the Ladybug Image Stitching Process. Retrieved 06.02.2019, from https://www.flir.eu/globalassets/support/iis/applicationnotes/tan2008010_overview_ladybug_image_stitching.pdf
  17. Raheja, J. L., Chaudhary, A., & Singal, K. (2011). Tracking of Fingertips and Centers of Palm Using KINECT. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling & Simulation.
  18. Roborealm. (2016). Kinect Targeting. Retrieved 01.11.2018, from http://www.roborealm.com/tutorial/FIRST/slide010.php
  19. Roupé, M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., & Johansson, M. (2014). Interactive navigation interface for Virtual Reality using the human body. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 43, 42-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.10.003
  20. Rundle, A. G., Bader, M. D. M., Richards, C. A., Neckerman, K. M., & Teitler, J. O. (2011). Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments. American journal of preventive medicine, 40(1), 94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034
  21. Schwarz, L. A., Mkhitaryan, A., Mateus, D., & Navab, N. (2012). Human skeleton tracking from depth data using geodesic distances and optical flow. Image and Vision Computing, 30(3), 217-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2011.12.001
  22. Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R.,. Blake, A. (2011, 20-25 June 2011). Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. Paper presented at the CVPR 2011.
  23. Suma, E. A., Krum, D. M., Lange, B., Koenig, S., Rizzo, A., & Bolas, M. (2013). Adapting user interfaces for gestural interaction with the flexible action and articulated skeleton toolkit. Computers & Graphics, 37(3), 193-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.11.004
  24. Tran, K. N., Kakadiaris, I. A., & Shah, S. K. (2012). Partbased motion descriptor image for human action recognition. Pattern Recognition, 45(7), 2562-2572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.12.028
  25. Xia, L., Chen, C., & Aggarwal, J. K. (2011, 20-25 June 2011). Human detection using depth information by Kinect. Paper presented at the CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS.
  26. Yemenicioglu, C., Kaya, S., & Seker, D. Z. (2016). Accuracy of 3D (Three-Dimensional) Terrain Models in Simulations. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 1(1), 34-38, doi: 10.26833/ijeg.285223
  27. Yue, H., Chen, W., Wu, X., & Liu, J. (2014). Fast 3D modeling in complex environments using a single Kinect sensor. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 53, 104-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.08.009
  28. Zhou, H., Wang, L., & Suter, D. (2009). Human action recognition by feature-reduced Gaussian process classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 30(12), 1059-1066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.03.013
  29. Anguelov, D., Dulong, C., Filip, D., Frueh, C., Lafon, S., Lyon, R.,. Weaver, J. (2010). Google Street View: Capturing the World at Street Level. Computer, 43(6), 32-38. doi: 10.1109/MC.2010.170
  30. Bakirman, T., Gumusay, M. U., Reis, H. C., Selbesoglu, M. O., Yosmaoglu, S., Yaras, M. C.,. Bayram, B. (2017). Comparison of low cost 3D structured light scanners for face modeling. Applied Optics, 56(4), 985-992. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.000985
  31. Izadi, S., Kim, D., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Newcombe, R., Kohli, P.,. Fitzgibbon, A. (2011). KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
  32. Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R.,. Blake, A. (2011, 20-25 June 2011). Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. Paper presented at the CVPR 2011.