SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alatarım / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Rootstocks Characteristics of Different Persimmon Species

Bazı Trabzon Hurması Türlerinin Anaçlık Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Celil TOPLU
Müge KAMİLOĞLU
Mustafa KAPLANKIRAN
Ercan YILDIZ
Journal
Alatarım
Pages
92–99
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The size of nursery varieties on the Diospyros kaki rootstock was found to be higher than those on Diospyros lotus rootstocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the germination rate, nursery and seedling development of persimmon species were identified.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seed germination rate was 67.2% in Diospyros lotus and 66.5% in Diospyros kaki species.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The size of nursery varieties on the Diospyros kaki rootstock was found to be higher than those on Diospyros lotus rootstocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the germination rate, nursery and seedling development of persimmon species were identified. Seed germination rate was 67.2% in Diospyros lotus and 66.5% in Diospyros kaki species. The rootstocks diameter and plant height of Diospyros lotus was less than that Diospyros kaki rootstocks. The lowest retention rate of grafting Hana Fuyu / Diospyros lotus (44.40%) and MKÜ Harbiye / Diospyros lotus (45.00%) took place in the rootstock-scion combinations. The highest retention rates grafting MKÜ Harbiye / Diospyros kaki (70.00%) on the rootstock-scion combinations. The size of nursery varieties on the Diospyros kaki rootstock was found to be higher than those on Diospyros lotus rootstocks.

Özet

Bu çalışmada farklı Trabzon hurması türlerinin çimlenme oranları, çöğür ve fidan gelişimleri belirlenmiştir. Tohumların çimlenme oranları Diospyros lotus türünde %67.2, Diospyros kaki türünde ise %66.5 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Diospyros lotus anacının çapı ve bitki boyu Diospyros kaki anacına göre daha az olmuştur. En düşük aşı tutma oranı Hana Fuyu/ Diospyros lotus (%44,40) ve MKÜ Harbiye/ Diospyros lotus (%45,00) anaç-kalem kombinasyonlarından elde edilmiştir. En yüksek aşı tutma oranları ise MKÜ Harbiye/ Diospyros kaki (%70,00) anaç-kalem kombinasyonunda gerçekleşmiştir. Diospyros kaki anacı üzerindeki çeşitlerin fidan boylarının Diospyros lotus anacı üzerindekilere göre daha fazla olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPLU, C., KAMİLOĞLU, M., KAPLANKIRAN, M., YILDIZ, E. (2019). Determination of Rootstocks Characteristics of Different Persimmon Species. Alatarım, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 92–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/141288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bellini, E., 2002. Cultural practices for persimmon production. In: E. Bellini & E Giordani (eds.). 1. Mediterranean symposium on persimmon, 23-24 Nov 2001, Faenza (Italy). Bilgener, Ş,K., Özcan, M., Serdar, Ü., Özkaraman, F., 1995. Bazı Uygulamaların Yabani Trabzon Hurması Tohumlarının (Diospyros lotus L.) Çimlenme ve Çöğür Gelişimleri Üzerine Etkileri. Türkiye II. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, Adana, 591-594.
  2. Cepoiu, N., Stanica, F., 2002. Preliminary results regarding nursery behaviour of some persimmon cultivars. 1. Mediterranean Symposium on Persimmon, 23-24 Nov 2001, Faenza (Italy). Cohen, Y., Gur, A., Barkai, Z., Blumenfeld, A., 1991. Decline of persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) trees on Diospyros virginiana rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 48(1- 2): 61-70.
  3. Daood, H.G., Biacs, P., Czinkotai, B., Hoschke, A., 1992. Chromatographic investigation of carotenoids, sugars and organic acids from Diospyros kaki fruits. Food Chemistry 45, 151–155. Faostat, 2017. Faostat Statistical Database. http: // www.apps.fao.org. Gao, Z.H., Zhang, Z., Duan, F., 1996. Observation of anatomical structure on rootstock and scion and their joint in sweet persimmon. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science and Technology, 23: 21- 24. Kaşka, N., Yılmaz, M., 1974. Bahçe Bitkileri Yetiştirme Tekniği. ÇÜ. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları 79, Ders Kitapları: 2, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, 610s. Kitagawa, H., Glucina, P.G., 1984. Persimmon Culture in New Zeland. DSIR Information Series No. 159, Science Information Publishing Centre, Wellington, 74s. Kumar, R.V., Nayudu, M.V., Rao, K.N., 1989. Studies on Nagapatla reserve forest ecosystem management. Proceedings of 3. Conference, Mendelian Society of India, 4-7 April, 1989,
  4. New Delhi, India, 423-439.
  5. Omarov, M.D., Erokhina, A.I., 1989. The distribution of the persimmon root system in the soil in relation to rootstocks. Subtropicheskie Kultury, (3): 78-82.
  6. Popovic, R.M., Cizmovic, M., Kulina, M., Ahmet, D., 2006. Influence of budding time of Japanese apple (Diospyros kaki) on acceptance and growth of plants. Vocarstvo, 40 (4), Cacak: Jugoslovensko Naucno Vocarsko Drustvo. Sas, 1999.
  7. SAS Online Doc, Version 8. SAS Inst., Cary, NC. Satheinkhot, W., Krisanapook, K., Boonprakob, U., Jutamanee, K., 2005. Comparative growth of persimmon seedling rootstocks in Thailand. Satheinkhot, ACIAR Technical Reports Series, (61): 61-64.
  8. Shimkhada, E.P., Gemma, H., 2005. Factors affecting the success potential of grafting related to persimmon cultiva