Journals / Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Hydraulic Conductivity Values of Soils in Different Soil Processing Conditions

Pages
132–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, increasing the organic matter content of the local soils will make significant contributions to sustainable soil management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hydraulic conductivity is an important indicator of water movement and pore structure in soil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three samples were colected from each field (9 samples in total).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, increasing the organic matter content of the local soils will make significant contributions to sustainable soil management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:9 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Hydraulic conductivity is an important indicator of water movement and pore structure in soil. Therefore, it is important to determine soil physical and hydraulic properties under different land use conditions. The present study was comducted under three different landuse; dry farming (D), irrigated land (I) and pastureland (P). Three samples were colected from each field (9 samples in total). Infiltration measurements were also tested at each sampling point in each field. The results of this study showed that although hydraulic conductivity was not significantly differentt under dry and irrigated agricultural lands, significant differences were observed between the pastureland and the tilled areas. Soil water infiltration was positively correlated with soil organic matter, aggregate stability and hydraulic conductivity, whereas infiltration was negatively correlated with bulk density. The lowest infiltration rate was found under pastureland compare to those are the highest under the irrigated lands. Therefore, increasing the organic matter content of the local soils will make significant contributions to sustainable soil management.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAL, S., BARİK, K. (2020). Hydraulic Conductivity Values of Soils in Different Soil Processing Conditions. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 132–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/141282

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agyare, W.A., Vlek, P.L.G., Dikau, R., Andreini, M., and Fosu, M., 2005. Soil Characterization and Modeling using Pedo-Transfer Functions and Artificial Neural Networks. Status Conference, Cologne, Germany, May 17-19.
  2. Aksakal, E.L., 2004. Soil Compaction and Its Importance for Agriculture, J. of Agricultural Faculty of Atatürk Univ., 35(3-4): 247-252. Anonoymus, 2019a. http://www.bigadic.gov.tr/geographic situation Anonoymus, 2019b. https://www.mgm.gov.tr /data evaluation /province and districts statistics.aspx?m=BALIKESIR Arshad, M., and Martin, S., 2002. Identifying Critical Limits for Soil Quality Indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 88(2): 153-160.
  3. Balesdent, J., Chenu, C. and Balabane, M., 2000. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil & Tillage Research. 53(3-4): 215-230.
  4. Barik, K., 2011. Effects of Barnyard Manure and Beet Pulp Addition on Some Soil Properties. J. of Agricultural Faculty of Atatürk Univ., 42(2): 133-138.
  5. Barik, K., Aksakal E., Islam K.R., Sari S., and Angin I., 2014. Spatial variability in soil compaction properties associated with field traffic operations, Catena 120: 122-133.
  6. Blake, G.R., and Hartge, K.H., 1986. Particle Density in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods (Ed. A, Klute). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Boadu, F.K., 2000. Hydraulic conductivity of soils from grainsize distribution: new models. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 126(8): 739-746.
  7. Canbolat, M., and Demiralay, İ., 1995. The relationship among aggregate stability, bulk density of briquet, modulus of rupture of organic material added soils. Soil Science Society of Turkey. Soil and Environment Symposium. Vol. 2 pp: A-116 A-124, Ankara.
  8. Danielson, R.E., and Sutherland, P.L., 1986. Porosity. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 443-461.
  9. Dao, T.H., 1993. Tillage and Winter Wheat Residue Management Effects on Water Infiltration and Storage. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 1586-1595.
  10. Demiralay, İ., 1993. Soil Physical Analysis Methods. Ataturk Univ. Agricultural Faculty Publications. Erzurum, 111- 120. Edwards, W.M., 1982. Predicting tillage effects on infiltration. ASA, CSSA, SSSA Books. ASA Special Publications 44: 105-115.
  11. Erşahin, S., 2001. Toprak Amenajmanı. GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Notları Serisi No: 21: 44-57.
  12. Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle-Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineral