SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

A Review on Fundamentals, Applications, Challenges and Current Status of Spiking Automotive Electronics

İsmail Can Dikmen(ISTINYE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7747-7777
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on these findings, a deployment roadmap is proposed around always on modules with explicit timing contracts, automotive grade benchmark suites, and safety case patterns that constrain learning and enforce monitorable behavioral contracts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Automotive edge systems face a growing gap between computational demand and what vehicle platforms can supply under tight power and thermal budgets, especially in autonomous vehicles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But earlier reviews on this subject tend to mix demonstrated uses with speculative applications and do not always relate efficiency claims to real driving conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on these findings, a deployment roadmap is proposed around always on modules with explicit timing contracts, automotive grade benchmark suites, and safety case patterns that constrain learning and enforce monitorable behavioral contracts.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ADAS · automotive electronics · edge AI

Abstract

Automotive edge systems face a growing gap between computational demand and what vehicle platforms can supply under tight power and thermal budgets, especially in autonomous vehicles. Neuromorphic computing is proposed as response, owing to its event driven operation. But earlier reviews on this subject tend to mix demonstrated uses with speculative applications and do not always relate efficiency claims to real driving conditions. This review addresses this gap in the literature; automotive system integration of neuromorphic hardware, spiking neural network training and deployment, event based sensing. Reviewed studies are separated into demonstrated implementations with measurable outcomes on stated platform and proposed opportunities that still lack automotive grade validation. Four observations are obtained from this review. First, efficiency gains from spike based processing become credible mainly when the workload is sparse and temporal by nature and when coding policy is selected with bounded time to decision in mind. Second, cross study comparison remains difficult because latency, energy, event rate condition, and stopping rule are usually reported in inconsistent ways across published studies. Third, deployment barriers are largely procedural, including toolchain maturity, integration of asynchronous accelerators with synchronous ECU timing, and the construction of safety arguments under ISO 26262 and SOTIF. Fourth, public industrial activity is still concentrated on bounded functions such as driver monitoring, keyword spotting, and radar pre processing rather than full neuromorphic autonomy stacks. Based on these findings, a deployment roadmap is proposed around always on modules with explicit timing contracts, automotive grade benchmark suites, and safety case patterns that constrain learning and enforce monitorable behavioral contracts.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dikmen, İ. C. (2026). A Review on Fundamentals, Applications, Challenges and Current Status of Spiking Automotive Electronics. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1845650

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (115)

  1. Mead C. Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proc IEEE. 1990;78(10):1629-1636. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.58356
  2. Halaly R, Ezra Tsur E. Autonomous driving controllers with neuromorphic spiking neural networks. Front Neurorobot. 2023;17:1234962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2023.1234962
  3. Moitra A, Bhattacharjee A, Kuang R, Panda P. SpikeSim: An end-to-end compute-in-memory hardware evaluation tool for benchmarking spiking neural networks. IEEE Trans Comput-Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst. 2024;43(1):90-103. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2023.3274918
  4. Shariff W, Dilmaghani MS, Kielty P, Moustafa M, Lemley J, Corcoran P. Event cameras in automotive sensing: A review. IEEE Access. 2024;12:51275-51306. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386032
  5. Man Y, Xie L, Qiao S, Zhou Y, Shang D. Differentiable ar-chitecture search with multi-dimensional attention for spiking neural networks. Neurocomputing. 2024;601:128181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128181
  6. Sanyal S, Joshi A, Nagaraj M, Manna RK, Roy K. Energy-efficient autonomous aerial navigation with dynamic vision sensors: A physics-guided neuromorphic approach. CoRR. 2025;abs/2502.05938. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.05938
  7. Lee HJ, Lim JH. Adaptive synaptic adjustment mechanism to improve learning performances of spiking neural networks. Comput Intell. 2024;40(5):e70001. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.70001
  8. Du Z, Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhou S, Zhi T. TDSNN: From deep neural networks to deep spike neural networks with temporal-coding. In: Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2019;33:1319-1326. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011319
  9. Maass W. Networks of spiking neurons: The third generation of neural network models. Neural Netw. 1997;10(9):1659-1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(97)00011-7
  10. Pfeiffer M, Pfeil T. Deep learning with spiking neurons: Op-portunities and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00774
  11. Thorpe S, Delorme A, Van Rullen R. Spike-based strategies for rapid processing. Neural Netw. 2001;14(6-7):715-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(01)00083-1
  12. Gerstner W, Kistler WM. Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neu-rons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815706
  13. Izhikevich EM. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2003;14(6):1569-1572. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2003.820440
  14. Gallego G, Delbruck T, Orchard G, Bartolozzi C, Taba B, Censi A, et al. Event-based vision: A survey. IEEE Trans Pat-tern Anal Mach Intell. 2022; 44(1):154-180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3008413
  15. Neftci EO, Mostafa H, Zenke F. Surrogate gradient learning in spiking neural networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2019;36(6):51-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2019.2931595
  16. Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippo-campal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 1998;18(24):10464-10472. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998
  17. Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat Neu-rosci. 2000;3(9):919-926. https://doi.org/10.1038/78829
  18. Merolla PA, Arthur JV, Alvarez-Icaza R, Cassidy AS, Sawada J, Akopyan F, et al. A million spiking-neuron integrated cir-cuit with a scalable communication network and interface. Science. 2014;345(6197):668-673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254642
  19. Isik MC, Tiwari K, Eryilmaz MB, Dikmen IC. Accelerating sensor fusion in neuromorphic computing: A case study on Loihi-2. In: 2024 IEEE HPEC. IEEE; 2024. p. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC62836.2024.10938501
  20. Davies M, Srinivasa N, Lin TH, Chinya G, Cao Y, Choday SH, et al. Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro. 2018;38(1):82-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2018.112130359
  21. Patel H, Vanarse A, Carlson KD, Osseiran A. Bringing touch to the edge: A neuromorphic processing approach for event-based tactile systems. In: 2023 IEEE 5th AICAS. 2023. p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICAS57966.2023.10168592
  22. Mayr C, Hoppner S, Furber S. SpiNNaker 2: A 10 million core processor system for brain simulation and machine learning — keynote presentation. In: Communicating Process Architectures 2017 & 2018. Concurrent Systems Engineering Series, Vol. 70. IOS Press; 2019. p.277-280. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-949-2-277
  23. Pehle C, Billaudelle S, Cramer B, Kaiser J, Schreiber K, Stradmann Y, et al. The BrainScaleS-2 accelerated neuromor-phic system with hybrid plasticity. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:795876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.795876
  24. Balaji A, Catthoor F, Das A, Wu Y, Huynh K, Dell'Anna FG, et al. Mapping spiking neural networks to neuromorphic hardware. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst. 2020;28(1):76-86. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVLSI.2019.2951493
  25. Lin CK, Wild A, Chinya GN, Cao Y, Davies M, Lavery DM, et al. Programming spiking neural networks on Intel's Loihi. Computer. 2018;51(3):52-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.157113521
  26. Bouvier M, Valentian A, Mesquida T, Rummens F, Reyboz M, Vianello E, et al. Spiking neural networks hardware imple-mentations and challenges: A survey. J Emerg Technol Com-put Syst. 2019;15(2):22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304103
  27. Kulkarni SR, Parsa M, Mitchell JP, Schuman CD. Benchmark-ing the performance of neuromorphic and spiking neural network simulators. Neurocomputing. 2021;447:145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.028
  28. Tang F, Gao W. SNNBench: End-to-end AI-oriented spiking neural network benchmarking. BenchCouncil Trans Bench-marks Stand Eval. 2023;3(1):100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100108
  29. Matinizadeh S, Das A. An open-source and extensible framework for fast prototyping and benchmarking of spiking neural network hardware. In: 2024 34th FPL. 2024. p. 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1109/FPL64840.2024.00042
  30. Waschle M, Thaler F, Berres A, Polzlbauer F, Albers A. A review on AI safety in highly automated driving. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:952773. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.952773
  31. Van Rullen R, Thorpe SJ. Rate coding versus temporal order coding: What the retinal ganglion cells tell the visual cortex. Neural Comput. 2001;13(6):1255-1283. https://doi.org/10.1162/08997660152002852
  32. Park S, Kim SJ, Na B, Yoon S. T2FSNN: Deep spiking neural networks with time-to-first-spike coding. In: 2020 57th ACM/IEEE DAC. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/DAC18072.2020.9218689
  33. Im J, Kim J, Yoo HN, Baek JW, Kwon D, Oh S, et al. On-chip trainable spiking neural networks using time-to-first-spike encoding. IEEE Access. 2022;10:31263-31272. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160271
  34. Zhang Z, Liu Q. Spike-event-driven deep spiking neural net-work with temporal encoding. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 2021;28:484-488. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2021.3059172
  35. Ma C, Yu Q. AugMapping: Accurate and efficient inference with deep double-threshold spiking neural networks. In: 2020 IEEE SSCI. 2020. p. 2002-2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308402
  36. Chowdhury SS, Garg I, Roy K. Spatio-temporal pruning and quantization for low-latency spiking neural networks. In: IJCNN 2021. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9534111
  37. Hu Y, Zheng Q, Jiang X, Pan G. Fast-SNN: Fast spiking neu-ral network by converting quantized ANN. IEEE Trans Pat-tern Anal Mach Intell. 2023; 45(12):14546-14562. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3275769
  38. Hu Y, Zheng Q, Pan G. BitSNNs: Revisiting energy-efficient spiking neural networks. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. 2024;16(5):1736-1747. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2024.3383428
  39. Meng Q, Xiao M, Yan S, Wang Y, Lin Z, Luo ZQ. Towards memory- and time-efficient backpropagation for training spiking neural networks. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF ICCV. 2023. p. 8446-8455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00776
  40. Nomura O, Sakemi Y, Hosomi T, Morie T. Robustness of spiking neural networks based on time-to-first-spike encoding against adversarial attacks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Ex-press Briefs. 2022;69(9):3640-3644. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2022.3184313
  41. Olin-Ammentorp W, Beckmann K, Schuman CD, Plank JS, Cady NC. Stochasticity and robustness in spiking neural net-works. Neurocomputing. 2021;419:23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.105
  42. Cao Y, Chen Y, Khosla D. Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition. Int J Com-put Vis. 2015;113(1):54-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0788-3
  43. Hunsberger E, Eliasmith C. Spiking deep networks with LIF neurons. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08829. 2015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1510.08829
  44. Rueckauer B, Lungu IA, Hu Y, Pfeiffer M, Liu SC. Conver-sion of continuous-valued deep networks to efficient event-driven networks for image classification. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11:682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00682
  45. Bu T, Fang W, Ding J, Dai P, Yu Z, Huang T. Optimal ANN-SNN conversion for high-accuracy and ultra-low-latency spiking neural networks. In: ICLR. 2022.
  46. Rathi N, Srinivasan G, Panda P, Roy K. Enabling deep spik-ing neural networks with hybrid conversion and spike timing dependent backpropagation. In: ICLR. 2020.
  47. Lee JH, Delbruck T, Pfeiffer M. Training deep spiking neural networks using backpropagation. Front Neurosci. 2016; 10:508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00508
  48. Shrestha SB, Orchard G. SLAYER: Spike layer error reas-signment in time. In: NeurIPS. 2018; 31:1419-1428.
  49. Fang W, Yu Z, Chen Y, Huang T, Masquelier T, Tian Y. Deep residual learning in spiking neural networks. In: NeurIPS. 2021; 34:21056-21069.
  50. Kudithipudi D, Schuman C, Vineyard CM, et al. Neuromor-phic computing at scale. Nature. 2025;637(8047):801-812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08253-8
  51. Parpart GG, Risbud SR, Kenyon GT, Watkins YZ. Imple-menting and benchmarking the locally competitive algorithm on the Loihi 2 neuromorphic processor. In: ICONS 2023. 2023. Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589737.3605973
  52. Fang W, Chen Y, Ding J, Yu Z, Masquelier T, Chen D, et al. SpikingJelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence. Sci Adv. 2023;9(40):eadi1480. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi1480
  53. Narduzzi S, Mateu L, Jokic P, Azarkhish E, Dunbar LA. Benchmarking neuromorphic computing for inference. In: Industrial Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Applica-tions. River Publishers; 2023. p. 1-20.
  54. Chen G, Cao H, Conradt J, Tang H, Rohrbein F, Knoll A. Event-based neuromorphic vision for autonomous driving: A paradigm shift for bio-inspired visual sensing and perception. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2020;37(4):34-49. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2985815
  55. Gehrig M, Aarents W, Gehrig D, Scaramuzza D. DSEC: A stereo event camera dataset for driving scenarios. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2021;6(3):4947-4954. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3068942
  56. Alonso I, Murillo AC. EV-SegNet: Semantic segmentation for event-based cameras. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF CVPRW. 2019. p. 1624-1633. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00205
  57. Jiang J, Zhou B, Zhou T, Zhong Y. Deep event-based object detection in autonomous driving: A survey. In: 2024 10th BigDIA. 2024. p. 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDIA63733.2024.10808654
  58. She X, Mukhopadhyay S. SPEED: Spiking neural network with event-driven unsupervised learning and near-real-time inference for event-based vision. IEEE Sens J. 2021; 21(18):20578-20591. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3098013
  59. Hasssan A, Meng J, Seo JS. Spiking neural network with learnable threshold for event-based classification and object detection. In: 2024 IJCNN. 2024. p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024.10650320
  60. Kosta AK, Roy K. Adaptive-SpikeNet: Event-based optical flow estimation using spiking neural networks with learnable neuronal dynamics. In: 2023 IEEE ICRA. 2023. p. 6021-6027. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160551
  61. Zhang Y, Lv H, Zhao Y, Feng Y, Liu H, Bi G. Event-based optical flow estimation with spatio-temporal backpropagation trained spiking neural network. Micromachines. 2023;14(1):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010203
  62. Viale A, Marchisio A, Martina M, Masera G, Shafique M. CarSNN: An efficient spiking neural network for event-based autonomous cars on the Loihi neuromorphic research proces-sor. In: 2021 IJCNN. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9533738
  63. Viale A, Marchisio A, Martina M, Masera G, Shafique M. LaneSNNs: Spiking neural networks for lane detection on the Loihi neuromorphic processor. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ IROS. 2022. p. 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981034
  64. Safa A, Keuninckx L, Gielen G, Catthoor F. Neuromorphic Solutions for Sensor Fusion and Continual Learning Systems. Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63565-6
  65. Safa A, Verbelen T, Ocket I, Bourdoux A, Sahli H, Catthoor F, et al. Fusing event-based camera and radar for SLAM using spiking neural networks with continual STDP learning. In: 2023 IEEE ICRA. 2023. p. 2782-2788. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160681
  66. Isik MC, Vishwamith H, Sur Y, Inadagbo K, Dikmen IC. NeuroSec: FPGA-based neuromorphic audio security. In: ARC 2024. Springer; 2024. p. 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55673-9_10
  67. Lopez-Randulfe J, Reeb N, Karimi N, Liu C, Gonzalez HA, Dietrich R, et al. Time-coded spiking Fourier transform in neuromorphic hardware. IEEE Trans Comput. 2022;71(11):2792-2802. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2022.3162708
  68. Lopez-Randulfe J, Duswald T, Bing Z, Knoll AC. Spiking neural network for Fourier transform and object detection for automotive radar. Front Neurorobot. 2021;15:688344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.688344
  69. Reeb N, Lopez-Randulfe J, Dietrich R, Knoll AC. Range and angle estimation with spiking neural resonators for FMCW ra-dar. Neuromorphic Comput Eng. 2025;5(2):024009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4386/adcf46
  70. Venon A, Dupuis Y, Vasseur P, Merriaux P. Millimeter wave FMCW radars for perception, recognition and localization in automotive applications: A survey. IEEE Trans Intell Veh. 2022;7(3):533-555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2022.3167733
  71. Zhuang G, Bing Z, Huang K, Knoll A. Toward neuromorphic perception: Spike-driven lane segmentation for autonomous driving using LiDAR sensor. In: 2023 IEEE 26th ITSC. 2023. p. 2448-2453. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422133
  72. Roriz R, Tumnark P, Gomes T, Costeira JP, Bernardino A, Fonseca JR. Automotive LiDAR technology: A survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2022; 23(7):6282-6297. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3086804
  73. Kielty P, Dilmaghani MS, Shariff W, Ryan C, Lemley J, Cor-coran P. Neuromorphic driver monitoring systems: A proof-of-concept for yawn detection and seatbelt state detection us-ing an event camera. IEEE Access. 2023; 11:96363-96373. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3312190
  74. Chung HJ, Kang B, Yang YS. N-DriverMotion: Driver motion learning and prediction using an event-based camera and di-rectly trained spiking neural networks on Loihi 2. IEEE Open J Veh Technol. 2025; 6:68-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJVT.2024.3504481
  75. Iddrisu K, Shariff W, Corcoran P, O'Connor NE, Lemley J, Little S. Event camera-based eye motion analysis: A survey. IEEE Access. 2024; 12:136783-136804. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3462109
  76. Jiang Y, Wang W, Yu L, He C. Eye tracking based on event camera and spiking neural network. Electronics. 2024;13(14):2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142879
  77. Friedrichs F, Yang B. Camera-based drowsiness reference for driver state classification under real driving conditions. In: 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. 2010. p. 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2010.5548039
  78. Ghourabi A, Ghazouani H, Barhoumi W. Driver drowsiness detection based on joint monitoring of yawning, blinking and nodding. In: 2020 IEEE 16th ICCP. 2020. p. 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCP51029.2020.9266160
  79. Chen X, Su L, Zhao J, Qiu K, Jiang N, Zhai G. Sign language gesture recognition and classification based on event camera with spiking neural networks. Electronics. 2023;12(4):786. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040786
  80. Xing Y, Di Caterina G, Soraghan J. A new spiking convolu-tional recurrent neural network (SCRNN) with applications to event-based hand gesture recognition. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:590164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.590164
  81. Liu Q, Xing D, Tang H, Ma D, Pan G. Event-based action recognition using motion information and spiking neural net-works. In: IJCAI-21. 2021. p. 1743-1749. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/240
  82. Lei J, Cheng Y, Wang J, Xu L, Zhang J, Li Z. In-vehicle acoustic event detection model based on deep neural network. In: 2023 ICCSI. 2023. p. 503-508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSI58851.2023.10304030
  83. Antony A, Theimer W, Grossetti G, Friedrich CM. Acoustic event detection in vehicles: A multi-label classification ap-proach. Sensors. 2025;25(8):2591. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082591
  84. Yoo J, Lee CH, Jea HM, Lee SK, Yoon Y, Lee J, et al. Classi-fication of road surfaces based on CNN architecture and tire acoustical signals. Appl Sci. 2022;12(19):9521. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199521
  85. Park J, Min K, Kim H, Lee W, Cho G, Huh K. Road surface classification using a deep ensemble network with sensor fea-ture selection. Sensors. 2018;18(12):4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124342
  86. Li H, Liu F, Zhao Z, Karimzadeh M. Effective safety message dissemination with vehicle trajectory predictions in V2X net-works. Sensors. 2022;22(7):2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072686
  87. Khalid I, Maglogiannis V, Naudts D, Shahid A, Moerman I. Optimizing hybrid V2X communication: An intelligent tech-nology selection algorithm using 5G, C-V2X PC5 and DSRC. Future Internet. 2024;16(4):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16040107
  88. Dai X, Zhou R, Zhang J, He K, Lin F, Ma H. SocNet: A phys-ics-guided neural network for battery state-of-charge estima-tion robust to temperature variations and sensor noises. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification. 2025;11(5):11165-11176. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2025.3573618
  89. How DNT, Hannan MA, Lipu MSH, Sahari KSM, Ker PJ, Muttaqi KM. State-of-charge estimation of Li-ion battery in electric vehicles: A deep neural network approach. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2020;56(5):5565-5574. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2020.3004294
  90. Wei M, Ye M, Li JB, Wang Q, Xu X. State of charge estima-tion of lithium-ion batteries using LSTM and NARX neural networks. IEEE Access. 2020;8:189236-189245. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031340
  91. Dikmen IC, Ekici YE, Karadag T. Multi-chemistry battery management system for electric vehicles. Eur J Res Dev. 2022;2(4):32-49. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v2i4.115
  92. Ekici YE, Dikmen IC, Nurmuhammed M, Karadag T. Effi-ciency analysis of various batteries with real-time data on a hybrid electric vehicle. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2021;5(3):214-223. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.946047
  93. Wang Y, Han X, Guo D, Lu L, Chen Y, Ouyang M. Physics-informed recurrent neural network with fractional-order gra-dients for state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery. IEEE J Radio Freq Identif. 2022; 6:968-971. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRFID.2022.3211841
  94. Avanthika DSRSL, Udumula RR, Lokeshgupta B, Morampudi MK. Dual estimation of state of charge and state of health of a battery: Leveraging machine learning and deep neural net-works. In: 2025 4th ICPC2T. 2025. p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC2T63847.2025.10958585
  95. Dikmen IC. Neuromorphic battery management system (nBMS). Turkish Patent Application 2025/018585. 2025.
  96. Dikmen IC, Karadag T. Electrical method for battery chemi-cal composition determination. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:6496-6504. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3143040
  97. Dikmen IC, Ari A, Karadag T. Physics-informed LSTM and EKF fusion for robust battery SoC estimation. Turkish J Sci Technol. 2026;21(1):57-67. https://doi.org/10.55525/tjst.1812986.
  98. Dikmen IC. Adaptive, modular and intelligent battery man-agement system capable of automatically determining battery chemistry. Turkish Patent TR 2021 018973. 2021.
  99. International Organization for Standardization. Road vehicles - Functional safety. ISO 26262:2018. Geneva: ISO; 2018.
  100. International Organization for Standardization. Road vehicles - Safety of the intended functionality. ISO/PAS 21448:2019. Geneva: ISO; 2019.
  101. Calaim N, Dehmelt FA, Goncalves PJ, Machens CK. The geometry of robustness in spiking neural networks. eLife. 2022;11:e73276. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73276
  102. Beland S, Chang I, Chen A, Moser M, Paunicka JL, Stuart D, et al. Towards assurance evaluation of autonomous systems. In: 2020 IEEE/ACM ICCAD. 2020. p. 1-6.
  103. Kuznietsov A, Gyevnar B, Wang C, Peters S, Albrecht SV. Explainable AI for safe and trustworthy autonomous driving: A systematic review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2024;25(12):19342-19364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3474469
  104. Peng L, Li B, Yu W, Yang K, Shao W, Wang H. SOTIF entro-py: Online SOTIF risk quantification and mitigation for au-tonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2024;25(2):1530-1546. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3322166
  105. Katz G, Barrett C, Dill DL, Julian K, Kochenderfer MJ. Relu-plex: An efficient SMT solver for verifying deep neural net-works. In: CAV. Springer; 2017. p. 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_5
  106. Zhang H, Cheng J, Zhang J, Liu H, Wei Z. A regularization perspective based theoretical analysis for adversarial robust-ness of deep spiking neural networks. Neural Netw. 2023;165:164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2023.05.038
  107. Liu Y, Bu T, Ding J, Hao Z, Huang T, Yu Z. Enhancing ad-versarial robustness in SNNs with sparse gradients. In: Proc 41st ICML (ICML'24). JMLR.org; 2024. Article 1239.
  108. van der Perk P. A Distributed Safety Mechanism for Auton-omous Vehicle Software Using Hypervisors [PhD thesis]. Eindhoven University of Technology; 2019.
  109. Yik J, Van den Berghe K, den Blanken D, et al. The Neuro-Bench framework for benchmarking neuromorphic compu-ting algorithms and systems. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):1545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56739-4
  110. Smolka M, Stoepel L, Quill J, Wahlbrink T, Floehr J, Boschen S, et al. Transdisciplinary development of neuromorphic computing hardware for artificial intelligence applications. In: Transformation Towards Sustainability. Springer; 2024. p. 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54700-3_10
  111. Isik MC, Naoukin J, Dikmen IC. NeuroVM: Dynamic neuro-morphic hardware virtualization. In: 2024 IEEE 15th IGSC. IEEE; 2024. p. 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGSC64514.2024.00023
  112. Finateu T, Niwa A, Matolin D, Tsuchimoto K, Mascheroni A, Reynaud E, et al. A 1280x720 back-illuminated stacked tem-poral contrast event-based vision sensor with 4.86um pixels, 1.066GEPS readout, programmable event-rate controller and compressive data-formatting pipeline. In: 2020 IEEE ISSCC. 2020. p. 112-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC19947.2020.9063149
  113. Jung S, Kim SJ. MRAM in-memory computing macro for AI computing. In: 2022 IEDM. 2022. p. 33.4.1-33.4.4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019461
  114. Kim Y, Chough J, Panda P. Beyond classification: Directly training spiking neural networks for semantic segmentation. Neuromorphic Comput Eng. 2022;2(4):044015. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4386/ac9b86
  115. Ekici YE, Dikmen IC, Nurmuhammed M, Karadag T. Effi-ciency analysis of various batteries with real-time data on a hybrid electric vehicle. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2021;5(3):214-223. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.946047