Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Optimization and Distance based Parameter Reduction Under q Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Environment for Electric Vehicle Battery Design

Leyla Efe(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK VE MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, MEKATRONİK MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, MEKATRONİK MÜHENDİSLİĞİ PR.)0009-0008-9902-5705
Burak Efe(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK VE MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, ENDÜSTRİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, ENDÜSTRİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ PR. (İNGİLİZCE))0000-0001-7092-3001
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed methodology can also be adapted to other multi-criteria decision-making problems involving uncertainty and a large number of criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Multi-criteria decision-making problems involving a large number of parameters can lead to information overload.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The applicability of the model is demonstrated through an electric vehicle battery design problem involving multiple criteria and alternatives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed methodology can also be adapted to other multi-criteria decision-making problems involving uncertainty and a large number of criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Electric vehicle battery design · Minkowski distance · Multi criteria decision making

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making problems involving a large number of parameters can lead to information overload. This study proposes a novel parameter reduction framework based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy (qROF) numbers to find the same ranking of alternatives using less parameters. The proposed approach combines two complementary approaches. First, an optimization-based model is developed using score values derived from qROF membership and non-membership degrees to identify the parameters considered without changing the alternative ranking. Second, a qROF-based Minkowski distance measure is introduced to detect redundant parameters based on a predefined threshold value. In current studies, the ranking of alternatives can be partially preserved or parameter reduction can be performed randomly. The proposed approach offers a systematic approach for parameter reduction presenting the same alternative ranking. The applicability of the model is demonstrated through an electric vehicle battery design problem involving multiple criteria and alternatives. The results highlight the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed integrated approach for complex decision-making environments. It successfully reduces the number of parameter while preserving the original ranking of alternatives. The integration of optimization-based and distance-based methods ensures a more clear and interpretable parameter reduction process. The proposed methodology can also be adapted to other multi-criteria decision-making problems involving uncertainty and a large number of criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

Efe, L., Efe, B. (2026). Optimization and Distance based Parameter Reduction Under q Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Environment for Electric Vehicle Battery Design. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1897352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Efe B, Boran FE, Kurt M. Sezgisel bulanık TOPSIS yöntemi kullanılarak ergonomik ürün konsept seçimi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2015;3(3):433-440.
  2. Duffy AHB, Andreasen MM, MacCallum KJ, Reijers LN. Design co-ordination for concurrent engineering. Journal of Engineering Design. 1993;4(4):251-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829308914785
  3. Mallahi S, Olamaei J, Sheikhi Fini A, Hosseini Montazer B. A hybrid intelligent decision-making framework for optimal location of electric vehicle battery swapping stations: With an emphasis on sustainable development components. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2025;135:106946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106946
  4. Aishwarya VM, Ekren BY, Singh T, Singh V. A stakeholder-centric fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing challenges and solutions in the sustainable circular supply chain of electric vehicle batteries. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain. 2025;17:100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100272
  5. Sutikno T, Arsadiando W, Purnama HS. Battery types and recent developments for energy storage in electric vehicles: Technical criteria and battery management system. Clean Energy. 2025;9(6):293-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaf048
  6. Sinha GK, Chattopadhyay N. Multi-criteria evaluation of electric vehicle alternatives for sustainable transportation using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection. 2024;44(12):1069-1080.
  7. Feng J, Guo P, Xu G, Xu G, Ning Y. An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection. Applied Energy. 2024;373:123897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123897
  8. Bakioğlu G. Prioritization of digital technology applications in intermodal freight transport using CRITIC-based picture fuzzy TOPSIS method. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9(2):230-240. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1639635
  9. Çıkmak S. Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach for evaluating the importance level of Industry 4.0 technologies in the automotive manufacturing industry. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9(1):26-39. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1522257
  10. Ejegwa PA, Kausar N, Aydin N, Deveci M. A novel Pythagorean fuzzy correlation coefficient based on Spearman’s technique of correlation coefficient with applications in supplier selection process. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2025;44:100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100762
  11. Ejegwa PA, Daniel WT, Kausar N, Aydin N. Novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy correlation measure based on Spearman’s correlation scheme with application in vehicle selection problem. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2026;15:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-026-00737-y
  12. Qin H, Mohd Noor AS, Ma X, Chiroma H, Herawan T. An adjustable reduction approach of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets for decision making. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences. 2017;11(4):999-1009. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/110407
  13. Ma X, Qin H. A new parameter reduction algorithm for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets based on Pearson’s product moment coefficient. Applied Intelligence. 2020;50(11):3718-3730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01708-1
  14. Qin H, Wang Y, Ma X, Wang J, Jiang C. A Euclidean distance-based parameter reduction algorithm for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023;234:121106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121106
  15. Ghosh S, Das S. Parameter reduction of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and its related algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA 2015). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 404. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 405-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2695-6_34
  16. Athira TM, John SJ. Parameter-reduction of Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets and corresponding algorithms. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2021;2336(1):040017. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045746
  17. Zhang H, Wang L, Wang D, Huang Z, Yu D, Peng Y. A parameter reduction-based decision-making method with interval-valued neutrosophic soft sets for the selection of bionic thin-wall structures. Biomimetics. 2024;9(4):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9040208
  18. Musa SY, Asaad BA. A novel approach towards parameter reduction based on bipolar hypersoft set and its application to decision-making. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. 2023;55(1):544-556.
  19. Tosun E, Keyinci S, Yakaryılmaz AC, Yıldızhan Ş, Özcanlı M. Evaluation of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2024;8(3):332-340. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1460955
  20. Gökciler OC, Geren N. An approach to selection and evaluation of battery enclosure materials for electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2026;10(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1830219
  21. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1986;20(1):87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
  22. Yager RR. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2014;22(4):958-965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
  23. Yager RR. Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2017;25(5):1222-1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
  24. Liu P, Wang P. Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018;33(2):259-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21927
  25. Du WS. Minkowski-type distance measures for generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2018;33(4):802-817. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21968
  26. Bakioğlu G. Prioritization of digital technology applications in intermodal freight transport using CRITIC-based picture fuzzy TOPSIS method. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9(2):230-240. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1639635
  27. Çıkmak S. Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach for evaluating the importance level of Industry 4.0 technologies in the automotive manufacturing industry. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9(1):26-39. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1522257
  28. Tosun E, Keyinci S, Yakaryılmaz AC, Yıldızhan Ş, Özcanlı M. Evaluation of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2024;8(3):332-340. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1460955
  29. Gökciler OC, Geren N. An approach to selection and evaluation of battery enclosure materials for electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2026;10(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1830219