Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Comparative Performance Analysis of Predictive Model Deployment for Daily Energy Demand of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations

Mustafa Teke(CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7262-4918
Mahmud Esad Yiğit(ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0148-1913
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the analysis results, the TabNet architecture has been the most successful model in terms of overall performance, achieving the lowest RMSE of 37.30 and the highest R2 score of 0.9724.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid global increase in electric vehicles (EVs) usage is leading a significant burden on charging infrastructure and requires precise energy management solutions for grid stability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate forecasting of daily energy consumption at charging stations is critical for minimizing operational costs and optimizing infrastructure planning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the analysis results, the TabNet architecture has been the most successful model in terms of overall performance, achieving the lowest RMSE of 37.30 and the highest R2 score of 0.9724.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Comparative Study · Deep learning · Electric vehicles

Abstract

The rapid global increase in electric vehicles (EVs) usage is leading a significant burden on charging infrastructure and requires precise energy management solutions for grid stability. Accurate forecasting of daily energy consumption at charging stations is critical for minimizing operational costs and optimizing infrastructure planning. This study presents a comprehensive comparative performance analysis of the deployment of different learning models to predict the daily energy demand of EV charging stations. In this paper, predictions have been performed based on variables such as the number of vehicles, charging time and connection time using real-time charging data. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms such as the Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Bayesian Ridge, Hist Gradient, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Ensemble Learning and Deep Learning (DL)-based TabNet have been integrated to resolve the complex and nonlinear structure of the dataset. The prediction performances of the models have been compared using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and R-Squared (Coefficient of Determination-R²) metrics. According to the analysis results, the TabNet architecture has been the most successful model in terms of overall performance, achieving the lowest RMSE of 37.30 and the highest R2 score of 0.9724. It has been followed by the Ensemble Voting model, which shared the same coefficient of determination (R2: 0.9724) and produced the lowest MAE value of 28.77. The obtained testing results demonstrate that TabNet and Ensemble Voting outperform traditional methods in capturing complex user behaviors and variable charging patterns.

🔖

Cite This Article

Teke, M., Yiğit, M. E. (2026). Comparative Performance Analysis of Predictive Model Deployment for Daily Energy Demand of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1905847

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Nasri S, Mansouri N, Mnassri A, Lashab A, Vasquez J, Rezk H. Global analysis of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and sustainable energy sources solutions. World Electr Veh J. 2025;16(4):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16040194
  2. Alaraj M, Radi M, Alsisi E, Majdalawieh M, Darwish M. Machine learning-based electric vehicle charging demand forecasting: a systematized literature review. Energies. 2025;18(17):4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174779
  3. Szumska E, Pawlik Ł, Frej D, Wilk-Jakubowski JŁ. Machine learning applications in energy consumption forecasting and management for electric vehicles: a systematic review. Energies. 2025;18(20):5420. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205420
  4. Akshay KC, Grace GH, Gunasekaran K, Samikannu R. Power consumption prediction for electric vehicle charging stations and forecasting income. Sci Rep. 2024;14:6497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56507-2
  5. Matkovic D, Sudic I, Capuder T. Day-ahead and intra-day forecasting of electric vehicle charging station energy consumption. In: 2023 8th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech); 2023; Split/Bol, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech58164.2023.10193158
  6. Almaghrebi A, Aljuheshi F, Rafaie M, James K, Alahmad M. Data-driven charging demand prediction at public charging stations using supervised machine learning regression methods. Energies. 2020;13(16):4231. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164231
  7. Abida A, Majdoul R, Zegrari M. Comparative of prediction algorithms for energy consumption by electric vehicle chargers for demand side management. Int J Electr Comput Eng. 2025;15(4):4192-4201. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v15i4.pp4192-4201
  8. Ostermann A, Haug T. Probabilistic forecast of electric vehicle charging demand: analysis of different aggregation levels and energy procurement. Energy Inform. 2024;7:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-024-00319-1
  9. Hussain I, Ching KB, Uttraphan C, Tay KG, Noor A. Evaluating machine learning algorithms for energy consumption prediction in electric vehicles: a comparative study. Sci Rep. 2025;15:16124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94946-7
  10. Zhang T, Peng Q, Zeng S. Predicting EV charging demand in renewable-energy-powered grids using explainable machine learning. Sustainability. 2025;17(9):4158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094158
  11. Shern SJ, Sarker MT, Haram MHSM, Ramasamy G, Thiagarajah SP, Al Farid F. Artificial intelligence optimization for user prediction and efficient energy distribution in electric vehicle smart charging systems. Energies. 2024;17(22):5772. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225772
  12. Sreekumar AV, Lekshmi RR. Electric vehicle charging station demand prediction model deploying data slotting. Results Eng. 2024;24:103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103095
  13. Ertarğin M. Predicting daily energy consumption in EV charging stations using tree-based models. Middle East J Sci. 2025;11(2):263-275. https://doi.org/10.51477/mejs.1674470
  14. Osman H, Azab A, AlGhazi A, Duffuaa S, Baki F. Forecasting electric vehicle charging loads using random forest and gene expression programming ensemble models. Results Eng. 2025;28:108369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108369
  15. Mystakidis A, Tsalikidis N, Koukaras P, Skaltsis G, Ioannidis D, Tjortjis C, et al. EV charging forecasting exploiting traffic, weather and user information. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2025;16:6737-6763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-025-02643-8
  16. Talaat FM, Salem M, Hamza AA. EV charging duration prediction using advanced ensemble learning techniques and feature importance analysis. Neural Comput Appl. 2025;37(30):25257-25281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-11576-w
  17. Genov E, De Cauwer C, Van Kriekinge G, Coosemans T, Messagie M. Forecasting flexibility of charging of electric vehicles: tree and cluster-based methods. Appl Energy. 2024;353:121969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121969
  18. Jabari M, Ghoreishi M, Bragatto T, Santori F, Maccioni M, Bellesini F. Predictive modeling and analysis of energy consumption in EV charging stations using machine learning techniques. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2025 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe); 2025; Chania, Crete, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope64998.2025.11169195
  19. Koohfar S, Woldemariam W, Kumar A. Performance comparison of deep learning approaches in predicting EV charging demand. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054258
  20. Ressler Z, Grijalva M, Ignacio AM, Torres M, Rojas AC, Moghadam R, et al. LSTM-based forecasting and analysis of EV charging demand in a dense urban campus. arXiv Preprint. 2025;arXiv:2510.16719. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.16719
  21. Akshayaa RN, Sajidha SA, Radha R. Session and energy forecasting for electric vehicle charging station using custom weighted ensemble machine learning. Results Eng. 2025;26:105104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105104
  22. Gholizadeh N, Musilek P. Daily electric vehicle charging dataset for training reinforcement learning algorithms. Data Brief. 2024;55:110587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110587
  23. Lee ZJ, Li T, Low SH. ACN-Data: analysis and applications of an open EV charging dataset. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems; 2019; Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3307772.3328313
  24. Barr AA, Rozman R, Guo E. Generative adversarial networks vs large language models: a comparative study on synthetic tabular data generation. arXiv Preprint. 2025;arXiv:2502.14523. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.14523
  25. Chen JQ, He YL, Cheng YC, et al. A multiple kernel-based kernel density estimator for multimodal probability density functions. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024;132:107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107979
  26. Hussain M, Haque A, Mateen S. Predictive analytics for EV charging demand: a machine learning perspective. In: 2025 7th International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment (ICEPE); 2025; Sohra (Cherrapunjee), India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE65965.2025.11139647
  27. González S, García S, Del Ser J, Rokach L, Herrera F. A practical tutorial on bagging and boosting based ensembles for machine learning: algorithms, software tools, performance study, practical perspectives and opportunities. Inf Fusion. 2020;64:205-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.07.007
  28. Wang Y, Luo Q, Cao L, Seth A, Liu J, Gopaluni B. Data-driven battery capacity estimation using support vector regression and model bagging under fast-charging conditions. Can J Chem Eng. 2024;102(10):3322-3332. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25394
  29. Chung YW, Khaki B, Li T, Chu C, Gadh R. Ensemble machine learning-based algorithm for electric vehicle user behavior prediction. Appl Energy. 2019;254:113732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113732
  30. Jafari S, Kim J, Choi W, Byun YC. Integrating multilayer perceptron and support vector regression for enhanced state of health estimation in lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Access. 2025;13:11463-11478. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3497656
  31. Wang Y, Gao G, Li X, Chen Z. A fractional-order model-based state estimation approach for lithium-ion battery and ultra-capacitor hybrid power source system considering load trajectory. J Power Sources. 2020;449:227543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227543
  32. Wang Y, Chen Z. A framework for state-of-charge and remaining discharge time prediction using unscented particle filter. Appl Energy. 2020;260:114324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114324
  33. Ma S, Ning J, Mao N, Liu J, Shi R. Research on machine learning-based method for predicting industrial park electric vehicle charging load. Sustainability. 2024;16(17):7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177258
  34. Tolun ÖC, Zor K, Tutsoy O. A comprehensive benchmark of machine learning-based algorithms for medium-term electric vehicle charging demand prediction. J Supercomput. 2025;81:475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-025-06975-8
  35. Kashifi MT, Ahmad I. Efficient histogram-based gradient boosting approach for accident severity prediction with multisource data. Transp Res Rec. 2022;2676(6):236-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221074370
  36. Lim Y, Bae S, Moon J. Optimal control scheme of electric vehicle charging using combined model of XGBoost and cumulative prospect theory. Energies. 2024;17(24):6457. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246457
  37. Mu Y, Zhou R, Zhao K, Jia H, Zu G, Yang Y. A charging demand prediction method for individual electric vehicle users based on dual-layer multisource data clustering and a LightGBM. Energy AI. 2025;22:100644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100644
  38. Siddiqui J, Ahmed U, Amin A, Alharbi T, Alharbi A, Aziz I, et al. Electric vehicle charging station load forecasting with an integrated DeepBoost approach. Alex Eng J. 2025;116:331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.069
  39. Sfar W, Amhaimar L, Khalidi A, Talbi B. A hybrid long-term photovoltaic power prediction model integrating a BiLSTM network with residual correction via CatBoost. Results Eng. 2026;29:108898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108898
  40. Ullah I, Liu K, Yamamoto T, Zahid M, Jamal A. Electric vehicle energy consumption prediction using stacked generalization: an ensemble learning approach. Int J Green Energy. 2021;18(9):896-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2021.1881902
  41. Dikmen İC, Yildiran N, Karadag T. Machine learning approaches for enhancing the SoH estimation of LTO batteries. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(1):48-59. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1522403
  42. Mühendis A, Akkaya R. Integrating machine learning with advanced features of L9963E BMS for enhanced state of charge estimation. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):475-490. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1698286
  43. Arık SÖ, Pfister T. TabNet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2021;35(8):6679-6687. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826
  44. Dikmen İC, Yildiran N, Karadag T. Machine learning approaches for enhancing the SoH estimation of LTO batteries. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(1):48-59. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1522403
  45. Mühendis A, Akkaya R. Integrating machine learning with advanced features of L9963E BMS for enhanced state of charge estimation. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):475-490. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1698286