Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Integrated Assessment of Non-Edible Biodiesel Production and Engine Performance and Emission Landscape under Diesel/Biodiesel Blends via RSM

Arif Savaş(Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1509-5183
Samet Uslu(KARABUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9118-5108
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The outcomes show that cottonseed biodiesel is a sustainable and eco-friendly substitute fuel that, when used properly, can lower emissions in diesel engines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays, a large portion of energy is produced using diesel engines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In a single-cylinder, four-stroke diesel engine, fuel mixtures made by mixing cottonseed biodiesel with diesel fuel at volumetric percentages of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% were tested under six distinct engine loads and at a constant speed of 3000 rpm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The outcomes show that cottonseed biodiesel is a sustainable and eco-friendly substitute fuel that, when used properly, can lower emissions in diesel engines.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cottonseed biodiesel · optimization · second generation biodiesel

Abstract

Nowadays, a large portion of energy is produced using diesel engines. Although they have many benefits, like long lifespans, great efficiency, and dependability, they also have serious drawbacks, including the depletion of fossil fuel supplies and the release of pollutants that are bad for the environment and human health. The purpose of this study was to reduce these drawbacks and assess the viability of an environmentally acceptable, sustainable alternative fuel. Biodiesel fuels were used in this case because they may be utilized in current diesel engines with little to no modification. Cottonseed biodiesel was chosen among the various forms of biodiesel because of its high production potential and the fact that it is not intended for direct human use. In a single-cylinder, four-stroke diesel engine, fuel mixtures made by mixing cottonseed biodiesel with diesel fuel at volumetric percentages of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% were tested under six distinct engine loads and at a constant speed of 3000 rpm. According to the experimental results, CO and HC emissions significantly decreased as the biodiesel ratio rose, but CO2 and NOx emissions increased. Additionally, because biodiesel has a reduced calorific value, BSFC increased but BTE decreased. Optimization studies were conducted using three different scenarios with RSM and experimental data. In the scenario where all output parameters were assumed to be equally important, the ideal biodiesel ratio was found to be 9.22% and the engine load to be 1451.71 W. Under these ideal conditions, NOx was 633.69 ppm, HC was 20.84 ppm, CO2 was 5.27%, CO was 0.028%, BTE was 19.87%, and BSFC was 411.41 g/kWh. The outcomes show that cottonseed biodiesel is a sustainable and eco-friendly substitute fuel that, when used properly, can lower emissions in diesel engines.

🔖

Cite This Article

Savaş, A., Uslu, S. (2026). Integrated Assessment of Non-Edible Biodiesel Production and Engine Performance and Emission Landscape under Diesel/Biodiesel Blends via RSM. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1897071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Şener R. Experimental and numerical analysis of a waste cooking oil biodiesel blend used in a CI engine. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences. 2021;33:299–307. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.829006
  2. Kalender V, Bayer MU, Yavuz M, Yilmaz IT. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of an RCCI diesel engine fuelled with fusel oil addition. Processes. 2026;14:558. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030558
  3. Bayer MU, Yilmaz İT, Vargün M, Kalender V, Çelik V. Investigation of the effects of hydrogen and ammonia addition on a marine auxiliary compression ignition engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2026;216:153770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153770
  4. Elkelawy M, Aly Farag M, Seleem HE. Enhancing diesel engine power plant efficiency and cutting emissions with commercial fuel additives in generator systems. Pharos Engineering Science Journal. 2025;2:37–46. https://doi.org/10.21608/pesj.2025.352985.1012
  5. Savaş A, Uslu S, Şener R. Optimization of performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with MgCO3 nanoparticle doped second generation biodiesel from jojoba by using response surface methodology (RSM). Fuel. 2025;381:133658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133658
  6. Savaş A, Bilgili L. Emission estimation of ship traffic in the Dardanelles. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries. 2022;5:80–85. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1134339
  7. Küçüksarıyıldız H, Yaylalı Ç, Güney B. Investigation of the effect of internal combustion engine exhaust gases on workshop air quality and the importance of ventilation systems. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9:618–625. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1813591
  8. Hassan QH, Al-Abboodi H. Experimental investigation of the impact of methanol-diesel blends on diesel engine emissions and performance. Combustion Engines. 2025;201(2):150–157. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-204494
  9. Uslu S, Celik MB. Performance and exhaust emission prediction of a SI engine fueled with i-amyl alcohol-gasoline blends: An ANN coupled RSM based optimization. Fuel. 2020;265:116922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116922
  10. Houghton-Alico D. Alcohol fuels: policies, production, and potential. Routledge; 2019.
  11. Osman AI, Nasr M, Lichtfouse E, Farghali M, Rooney DW. Hydrogen, ammonia and methanol for marine transportation. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2024;22:2151–2158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01757-9
  12. Dhamodaran G, Venugopal S, Seetharaman S, Palsami T. Comparative analysis of a diesel engine fueled with hydrogen-enriched nanoparticle-emulsified second-generation biodiesel. Fuel. 2026;409:137851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137851
  13. Rosha P, Kumar S, Senthil Kumar P, Kowthaman CN, Kumar Mohapatra S, Dhir A. Impact of compression ratio on combustion behavior of hydrogen enriched biogas-diesel operated CI engine. Fuel. 2022;310:122321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122321
  14. Horoz E, Baydır ŞA. Engine speed-dependent NOx reduction behavior of safflower-sunflower biodiesel blends in an SCR-equipped diesel engine. Engineering Perspective. 2026;6(3):331–343. https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1894491
  15. Celik M, Bayindirli C, İlhak Mİ. Investigation of the performance and emissions of an engine operated with CeO2 nano additive doped biodiesel. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2022;6:113–119. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1063986
  16. Celik M, Bayındırlı C, Kuş R. Experimental investigation of effect of n-hexane addition in diesel and biodiesel fuels on performance and emissions characteristics. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2023;7:118–124. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1257614
  17. Krishnan R, S KM, Paramasivam P, Ayanie AG. Investigation of bamboo biodiesel performance in variable compression ratio engines. Energy Science & Engineering. 2025;13:5465–5481. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70252
  18. Zhou G, Zhao X, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Dong S, Peng Q. Performance assessment of a diesel engine fueled with biodiesel in a plateau environment. Energies. 2025;18:1955. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18081955
  19. Simsek S. Effects of biodiesel obtained from canola, safflower oils and waste oils on the engine performance and exhaust emissions. Fuel. 2020;265:117026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117026
  20. Yasin MHM, Paruka P, Mamat R, Yusop AF, Najafi G, Alias A. Effect of low proportion palm biodiesel blend on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine. Energy Procedia. 2015;75:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.145
  21. Lei T, Wang Z, Chang X, Lin L, Yan X, Sun Y, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine running on optimized ethyl levulinate–biodiesel–diesel blends. Energy. 2016;95:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.059
  22. Asokan MA, Senthur Prabu S, Bade PKK, Nekkanti VM, Gutta SSG. Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of juliflora biodiesel fuelled DI diesel engine. Energy. 2019;173:883–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.075
  23. Kumar P, Sharma MP, Dwivedi G. Impact of ternary blends of biodiesel on diesel engine performance. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. 2016;25:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.06.010
  24. Srithar K, Arun Balasubramanian K, Pavendan V, Ashok Kumar B. Experimental investigations on mixing of two biodiesels blended with diesel as alternative fuel for diesel engines. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 2017;29:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.04.008
  25. Ge S, Brindhadevi K, Xia C, Salah Khalifa A, Elfasakhany A, Unpaprom Y, et al. Enhancement of the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of spirulina microalgae biodiesel blends using nanoparticles. Fuel. 2022;308:121822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121822
  26. Savaş A, Uslu S, Kaya T. From waste to clean energy: multi-objective optimization of engine efficiency and emissions using waste plastic oil. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 2025;14:215–228. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1691757
  27. Shehata MS, Razek SMA. Experimental investigation of diesel engine performance and emission characteristics using jojoba/diesel blend and sunflower oil. Fuel. 2011;90:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.011
  28. Tarabet L, Loubar K, Lounici MS, Hanchi S, Tazerout M. Eucalyptus biodiesel as an alternative to diesel fuel: Preparation and tests on DI diesel engine. BioMed Research International. 2012;2012:235485. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/235485
  29. Gumus M, Kasifoglu S. Performance and emission evaluation of a compression ignition engine using a biodiesel (apricot seed kernel oil methyl ester) and its blends with diesel fuel. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2010;34:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.029
  30. İlkılıç C, Çılğın E, Aydın H. Terebinth oil for biodiesel production and its diesel engine application. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2015;88:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.09.001
  31. Suvanjumrat C, Kongsarai K, Phong-arom P, Chumphong N, Promtong M, Priyadumkol J. Development and optimization of an electrohydrodynamic dehydrator using ANN-GA for improved energy performance. Results in Engineering. 2025;27:106049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106049
  32. Ajith BS, Manjunath Patel GC, Der O, Selvan CP, Samuel OD, Annadurai S, et al. Microwave-assisted transesterification of hybrid Garcinia gummi-gutta and Garcinia indica oils: Optimization using RSM and meta-heuristic algorithms for high-yield biodiesel production. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2025;202:108223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108223
  33. Kumaran P, Natarajan S, Kumar SMP, Rashid M, Nithish S. Optimization of diesel engine performance and emissions characteristics with tomato seed blends and EGR using response surface methodology. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2023;7:223–233. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1326036
  34. Savaş A, Uslu S, Saral Ş. Enabling a sustainable diesel future: Emission control and performance enhancement with B2O3 nanoparticles via RSM optimization. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9:174–185. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1679467
  35. Der O. Multi-output prediction and optimization of CO2 laser cutting quality in FFF-printed ASA thermoplastics using machine learning approaches. Polymers. 2025;17:1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141910
  36. Basar G, Kahraman F, Der O. Multi-response optimization of drilling parameters in direct hot-pressed Al/B4C/SiC hybrid composites using Taguchi-based Entropy–CoCoSo method. Materials. 2025;18:4319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184319
  37. Mishra VK, Goswami R. A review of production, properties and advantages of biodiesel. Biofuels. 2018;9:273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1336350
  38. Eryilmaz T, Yesilyurt MK, Cesur C, Gokdogan O. Biodiesel production potential from oil seeds in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;58:842–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.172
  39. Riaz T, Iqbal MW, Mahmood S, Yasmin I, Leghari AA, Rehman A, et al. Cottonseed oil: A review of extraction techniques, physicochemical, functional, and nutritional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2023;63:1219–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1963206
  40. Mohamad M, Ngadi N, Wong SL, Jusoh M, Yahya NY. Prediction of biodiesel yield during transesterification process using response surface methodology. Fuel. 2017;190:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.123
  41. Yuksel S, Sirin TB, Ay M, Uçar M, Kurt M. A study on end mill tool geometry parameters for end milling of 316L: finite element analysis and response surface methodology optimization based on resultant cutting force. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2024;46:452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05027-1
  42. Canan A. Multi-purpose optimization with response surface methodology of plastic waste cables to clean energy with graphene nanoparticles. Journal of Environmental Management. 2025;391:126336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126336
  43. Şirin TB, Der O, Kuş H, Avdan ÇG, Yüksel S, Etyemez A, et al. Optimization of end mill geometry for machining 1.2379 cold-work tool steel through hybrid RSM-ANN-GA coupled FEA approach. Machines. 2025;14:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14010015
  44. Savaş A, Uslu S, Erorhan N. Next-generation cleaner and efficient diesel operation with Mn2O3 nanoparticles: Experimental insights and multiobjective RSM optimization. Next Energy. 2026;12:100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2026.100630
  45. Zhang Z, Wang T, Jia M, Wei Q, Meng X, Shu G. Combustion and particle number emissions of a direct injection spark ignition engine operating on ethanol/gasoline and n-butanol/gasoline blends with exhaust gas recirculation. Fuel. 2014;130:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.052
  46. Panchasara H, Ashwath N. Effects of pyrolysis bio-oils on fuel atomisation: A review. Energies. 2021;14:794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040794
  47. Liu Z, Li S, Zhang J, Wang Y, Dai Y, Niu L, et al. Solid fuel emissions of CO pollutants in iron ore sintering process: Generation, control, and challenges. Steel Research International. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202500677
  48. Mofijur M, Ahmed SF, Ahmed B, Mehnaz T, Mehejabin F, Shome S, et al. Impact of nanoparticle-based fuel additives on biodiesel combustion: An analysis of fuel properties, engine performance, emissions, and combustion characteristics. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2024;21:100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100515
  49. Li R, Wang Z, Ni P, Zhao Y, Li M, Li L. Effects of cetane number improvers on the performance of diesel engine fuelled with methanol/biodiesel blend. Fuel. 2014;128:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.011
  50. Koç MA, Şener R. Prediction of emission and performance characteristics of reactivity-controlled compression ignition engine with the intelligent software based on adaptive neural-fuzzy and neural-network. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;318:128642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128642
  51. Kumar M, Ansari NA, Gautam R. Optimising CRDI engine performance using waste-derived biodiesel, bioethanol, and ceric oxide nanoparticles: An RSM approach for emission reduction and economic viability. Fuel. 2026;415:138435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.138435
  52. Tüccar G, Tosun E, Uludamar E. Investigations of effects of density and viscosity of diesel and biodiesel fuels on NOx and other emission formations. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Science. 2018;6:81–85. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.371015
  53. Savaş A, Şener R, Uslu S, Der O. Experimental study on performance and emission optimization of MgO nanoparticle-enriched 2nd generation biodiesel: A method for employing nanoparticles to improve cleaner diesel combustion. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2025;120:102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2025.102024
  54. Venkatesan SP, Rahul R, Sabbharishi V, Purusothamand M, Ganesan S. Study of emission characteristics of a diesel engine run by fuel blends of diesel, jatropha biodiesel and cetane improver. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.404
  55. Nanda Behera B, Kumar Hotta T. Influence of copper oxide nanoparticles on the performance, emission, and combustion measures of a VCR engine using palm biodiesel blended with n-butanol: A combined experimental and ANN-GA-based study. Fuel. 2025;381:133504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133504
  56. Dere C, Deniz C. Effect analysis on energy efficiency enhancement of controlled cylinder liner temperatures in marine diesel engines with model based approach. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;220:113015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113015
  57. El-Shafay AS, Ağbulut Ü, Attia E-A, Touileb KL, Gad MS. Waste to energy: Production of poultry-based fat biodiesel and experimental assessment of its usability on engine behaviors. Energy. 2023;262:125457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125457
  58. Sarıdemir S, Etem Gürel A, Ağbulut Ü, Bakan F. Investigating the role of fuel injection pressure change on performance characteristics of a DI-CI engine fuelled with methyl ester. Fuel. 2020;271:117634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117634
  59. Afzal A, Soudagar MEM, Belhocine A, Kareemullah M, Hossain N, Alshahrani S, et al. Thermal performance of compression ignition engine using high content biodiesels: A comparative study with diesel fuel. Sustainability. 2021;13:7688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147688
  60. Feng Z, Zhang J, Gu J, Leng X, He Z, Nishida K. Improving biodiesel atomization performance in CI engines: A review of spray behavior, droplet impingement, and advanced techniques. Processes. 2025;13:2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082527
  61. Küçüksarıyıldız H, Yaylalı Ç, Güney B. Investigation of the effect of internal combustion engine exhaust gases on workshop air quality and the importance of ventilation systems. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9:618–625. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1813591
  62. Celik M, Bayindirli C, İlhak Mİ. Investigation of the performance and emissions of an engine operated with CeO2 nano additive doped biodiesel. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2022;6:113–119. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1063986
  63. Celik M, Bayındırlı C, Kuş R. Experimental investigation of effect of n-hexane addition in diesel and biodiesel fuels on performance and emissions characteristics. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2023;7:118–124. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1257614
  64. Kumaran P, Natarajan S, Kumar SMP, Rashid M, Nithish S. Optimization of diesel engine performance and emissions characteristics with tomato seed blends and EGR using response surface methodology. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2023;7:223–233. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1326036
  65. Savaş A, Uslu S, Saral Ş. Enabling a sustainable diesel future: Emission control and performance enhancement with B2O3 nanoparticles via RSM optimization. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology. 2025;9:174–185. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1679467