Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Examining Modal Vibration Analysis in Automotive Headlight Testing Systems

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the combined numerical and experimental findings, viscoelastic damping and improved isolation/noise mitigation are recommended to reduce resonance sensitivity and enhance test repeatability and accuracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Automotive headlamps are critical for safety, but prone to vibration-induced misalignment, reducing visibility by up to 40–50% and risking non-compliance with UN/ECE and FMVSS standards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study conducts modal analysis on a vibration test bench with a cam-based vertical stroke mechanism for headlamp durability, comparing fixed UCP 205 bearings with natural frequencies of 354.57–2831.6 Hz and rotational freedom mounts with 87.67–3347.4 Hz using SolidWorks Simulation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the combined numerical and experimental findings, viscoelastic damping and improved isolation/noise mitigation are recommended to reduce resonance sensitivity and enhance test repeatability and accuracy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Automotive Headlight · Cam-Driven Mechanism · Modal Analysis

Abstract

Automotive headlamps are critical for safety, but prone to vibration-induced misalignment, reducing visibility by up to 40–50% and risking non-compliance with UN/ECE and FMVSS standards. This study conducts modal analysis on a vibration test bench with a cam-based vertical stroke mechanism for headlamp durability, comparing fixed UCP 205 bearings with natural frequencies of 354.57–2831.6 Hz and rotational freedom mounts with 87.67–3347.4 Hz using SolidWorks Simulation. The first 10 eigenfrequencies, mode shapes, and effective/cumulative effective mass participation factors (EMPF/CEMPF) are evaluated to quantify directional dynamic dominance and to assess resonance susceptibility. Although the nominal operating range is 10–100 Hz, the rotational configuration introduces a resonance risk at 87.67 Hz (Mode 1), producing a maximum shaft deformation of 0.12 mm and implying potential bearing wear and headlamp misalignment under sustained excitation. In contrast, the fixed-bearing configuration shifts the lowest modes well above the operating band, indicating a stiffer support representation but potentially less realistic boundary compliance. Experimental validation at 35 Hz with 3.5 mm amplitude—selected to represent low-frequency road-induced vibration profiles—showed stable electrical and optical behavior with ±0.2 A current fluctuations. Noise measurements indicated levels exceeding 85 dB at 36 Hz, attributed to motor–cam interactions, representing an occupational exposure concern under TS EN ISO 9612 rather than structural failure. Based on the combined numerical and experimental findings, viscoelastic damping and improved isolation/noise mitigation are recommended to reduce resonance sensitivity and enhance test repeatability and accuracy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayiş, Y., Ercan, E., Kibar, A. (2026). Examining Modal Vibration Analysis in Automotive Headlight Testing Systems. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1745870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Borzendowski SAW, Stafford Sewall AA, Rosopa PJ, Tyrrell RA. Drivers' judgments of the effect of headlight glare on their ability to see pedestrians at night. J Safety Res. 2015;53:31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.001
  2. Riexinger LE, Kidd DG, Jermakian J. Estimated potential of human drivers and automatic braking to prevent frontal crashes based on headlight visibility. Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(sup1):S78-S85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2374955
  3. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Regulation No. 48: uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the installation of lighting and light-signalling devices. E/ECE/324, E/ECE/TRANS/505, Rev.1/Add.47/Rev.6. Geneva: United Nations.
  4. Vrabel J, Stopka O, Palo J, Stopkova M, Droździel P, Michalsky M. Research regarding different types of headlights on selected passenger vehicles when using sensor-related equipment. Sensors. 2023;23(4):1978. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041978
  5. Yatak MÖ, Hisar Ç, Şahin F. Fuzzy logic controller for half vehicle active suspension system: an assessment on ride comfort and road holding. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2024;8(2):179-187. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1372001
  6. Kharche S, Karajagi P, Kulkarni R. Design development and vibration analysis of MCM300 headlamp. Int J Eng Trends Technol. 2016;38(1):168-175. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V38P230
  7. Mechefske CK, Sun Q. Failure detection in automotive light assemblies during vibration endurance testing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;51(5-8):799-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2652-0
  8. Rumyantsev SL, Shur MS, Bilenko Y, Kosterin PV, Salzberg BM. Low frequency noise and long-term stability of noncoherent light sources. J Appl Phys. 2004;96(2):966-969. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1763225
  9. Arat Ö, Duran A, Erman B, Kibar A. Structural investigation of pneumatic grippers for handling automotive parts using finite element analysis and topology optimization. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Univ J Eng Sci. 2025;28(1):380-390. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1569349
  10. Devarajan MM, Kumaragurparan G. Evaluation of thermal performance and vibration effects on automotive headlights for selection of heat sink geometry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2024;149(11):5659-5671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13194-5
  11. Hong D, Park J, Kim B. Positioning criteria for automotive headlamp module supports using transmitted force and natural frequency. Int J Automot Technol. 2021;22(6):1665-1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0143-y
  12. Siswanto WA, Ibrahim MN, Madlan MA, Mohamad SM. Shaker table design for electronic device vibration test system. Int J Eng Technol. 2011;3(6):663-668. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2011.V3.302
  13. Pandey S, Ganesan B. Enhancing bumper and headlamp durability: lightweight bumper design with optimized resonance frequency. Warrendale (PA): SAE International; 2024. SAE Technical Paper No.: 2024-28-0238. https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-28-0238
  14. Yazıcı M, Güçlü HA, Karen İ, Kandırmış İK, Malkoç S, Buyukluoğlu ÖF. Optimal design of light commercial vehicle headlamp for pedestrian protection. Acta Phys Pol A. 2016;130(1):262-265. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.130.262
  15. Ayiş Y, Ercan E, Kibar A. Otomobil farları için titreşim test cihazının tasarım ve performans analizi. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Black Sea Coastline Countries Scientific Research Conference; 2025 Mar 9; Samsun, Turkey. p. 288-295.
  16. Modak SV. Analytical and experimental modal analysis. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429454783
  17. Yatak MÖ, Hisar Ç, Şahin F. Fuzzy logic controller for half vehicle active suspension system: an assessment on ride comfort and road holding. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2024;8(2):179-187. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1372001