Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Formative Assessment in Teaching the Macedonian Language (Primary Education in R. Macedonia)

Violeta Januševa(Faculty of Education, St. “Vasko Karangelevski” - Bitola, Republic of Macedonia University)
Jana Jurukovska(Faculty of Education, St. “Vasko Karangelevski” - Bitola, Republic of Macedonia University)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-12-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The instrument consists of two questionnaires, one for students and one for teachers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the Republic of Macedonia, the formative assessment represents a new assessment paradigm that focuses on students as active participants during the teaching process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paradigm was established in 2007 as part of the Primary Education Project (PEP) by USAID (United States Agency for International Development).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The instrument consists of two questionnaires, one for students and one for teachers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Formative assessment · Teaching process · Macedonian language

Abstract

In the Republic of Macedonia, the formative assessment represents a new assessment paradigm that focuses on students as active participants during the teaching process. This paradigm was established in 2007 as part of the Primary Education Project (PEP) by USAID (United States Agency for International Development). This research is focused on the analysis of Macedonian language teaching curriculum from first to ninth grade of primary education in the Republic of Macedonia, on the analysis of the suitability of the tasks for formative assessment in one Macedonian language textbook, as well as on the examination of students’ and teachers’ viewpoints, concerning various aspects of formative assessment in Bitola, a region in the Republic of Macedonia. From the analysis it could be seen that there is strong support of formative assessment by the authorized structures, and that there are many positive and negative aspects of the use of formative assessment in the Macedonian language teaching process. The research has qualitative and quantitative paradigm. The methods for collecting and processing the data, and for gaining scientific conclusion are analysis, synthesis and comparison. The instrument consists of two questionnaires, one for students and one for teachers.

Özet

In the Republic of Macedonia, the formative assessment represents a new assessment paradigm that focuses on students as active participants during the teaching process. This paradigm was established in 2007 as part of the Primary Education Project (PEP) by USAID (United States Agency for International Development). This research is focused on the analysis of Macedonian language teaching curriculum from first to ninth grade of primary education in the Republic of Macedonia, on the analysis of the suitability of the tasks for formative assessment in one Macedonian language textbook, as well as on the examination of students’ and teachers’ viewpoints, concerning various aspects of formative assessment in Bitola, a region in the Republic of Macedonia. From the analysis it could be seen that there is strong support of formative assessment by the authorized structures, and that there are many positive and negative aspects of the use of formative assessment in the Macedonian language teaching process. The research has qualitative and quantitative paradigm. The methods for collecting and processing the data, and for gaining scientific conclusion are analysis, synthesis and comparison. The instrument consists of two questionnaires, one for students and one for teachers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Januševa, V., Jurukovska, J. (2016). Formative Assessment in Teaching the Macedonian Language (Primary Education in R. Macedonia). International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.266059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Almanah na proektot na USAID za osnovno obrazovanie. (2011). [Almanac of the USAID project for primary education]. Team of editors: Mojsoski, N., Dimitrovska, V., Miceva, E., Dimovska, A. Skopje: Project by USAID for primary education. http://www.scribd.com/doc/82280276/Проект-за-основно-образование-Алманах#scribd. Accessed 20 April 2015.
  2. Andrade, H., and Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48: 1, 12–19. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577544
  3. Author and Pejchinovska, M. (2011). Formative assessment in the teaching practice through the prism of the teachers. In Proceeding of International Science Conference: “Educational Technologies” 2011 on TU – Sofija, IPF – Sliven. Announcements of Union of Scientists – Sliven, Vol. 19: 71–76.
  4. Black, P. (2007). Formative Assessment: Promises or problems?. King’s College London [Adobe Acrobat Document]. Retrieved from
  5. https://www.learntogether.org.uk/resources/Documents/Formative%20Assessment%20in%20Music.pdf on 15 September 2014.