SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4

Construction and validation of a multilingual diagnostic instrument for neuromyths and their origins

Oktay Cem Adıgüzel(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7985-4871
Patrice Potvin(Université du Québec à Montréal)0000-0002-1623-2362
Sibel Küçükkayhan(ANADOLU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3035-9220
Derya Atik Kara(ANADOLU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6890-030X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The resulting neuromyth identification tool has been rigorously tested for its structural properties, such as validity and reliability, across different linguistic and cultural contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents the development of a comprehensive neuromyth identification tool designed to be valid, reliable, and multilingual, including French, English, Turkish, Greek, Kazakh, Arabic, Malay, and Chinese.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By incorporating languages from diverse geographic regions, the tool aims to increase the accessibility and relevance of neuromyth research, allowing for more comprehensive and generalizable findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The resulting neuromyth identification tool has been rigorously tested for its structural properties, such as validity and reliability, across different linguistic and cultural contexts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neuromyths · Learning and teaching · Neuroscience

Abstract

This study presents the development of a comprehensive neuromyth identification tool designed to be valid, reliable, and multilingual, including French, English, Turkish, Greek, Kazakh, Arabic, Malay, and Chinese. By incorporating languages from diverse geographic regions, the tool aims to increase the accessibility and relevance of neuromyth research, allowing for more comprehensive and generalizable findings. The primary research question guiding this study was: "What structural properties should a valid and reliable instrument have to effectively identify teachers' primary neuromyth beliefs and the origins of these beliefs?" A mixed-methods approach was used, integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure the robustness of the instrument. The development process unfolded in four key stages: (1) a thorough literature review to identify existing neuromyths and relevant survey instruments, (2) the design of the initial questionnaire, (3) pilot testing to evaluate and refine the instrument, and (4) language adaptation to ensure cultural and linguistic appropriateness in the target languages. The resulting neuromyth identification tool has been rigorously tested for its structural properties, such as validity and reliability, across different linguistic and cultural contexts.

🔖

Cite This Article

Adıgüzel, O. C., Potvin, P., Küçükkayhan, S., Kara, D. A. (2025). Construction and validation of a multilingual diagnostic instrument for neuromyths and their origins. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Volume: 12 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1566093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Adıgüzel, C., Atik-Kara, D., & Küçükkayhan, S. (2024). Misconceptions of the learning and teaching process: Neuromyths and their formal and informal sources introduction. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 27(53), 68-70. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy13019966
  2. Betts, K., Miller, M., Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Shewokis, P., Anderson, A., Borja, C., Galoyan, T., Delaney, B., Eigenauer, J., & Dekker, S. (2019). International report: Neuromyths and evidence-based practices in higher education. Online Learning Consortium.
  3. Bissessar, S., & Youssef, F.F. (2021). A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 23, Article 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155
  4. Carter, M., van Bergen, P., Stephenson, J., Newall, C., & Sweller, N. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and sources of information regarding neuromyths in an Australian cohort of preservice teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(10), 95 113. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n10.6
  5. Ching, F.N.Y., So, W.W.M., Lo, S.K., & Wong, S.W.H. (2020). Preservice teachers' neuroscience literacy and perceptions of neuroscience in education: Implications for teacher education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 21, Article 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144
  6. Craig, H.L., Wilcox, G., Makarenko, E.M., & MacMaster, F.P. (2021). Continued educational neuromyth belief in pre- and in-service teachers: A call for de-implementation action for school psychologists. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 127 141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573520979605
  7. Deans, C., & Larsen, E. (2022). Brain-based Learning: Beliefs and Practice in one Australian Primary School Implementing a Neuroscience Pedagogical Framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(10), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n10.2
  8. De Bruyckere, P., Kirschner, P.A., & Hulshof, C.D. (2015). Urban myths about learning and education. Academic Press.
  9. Deibl, I., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about neuroscience and education-Do freshmen and advanced students differ in their ability to identify myths?. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 22(1), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221146649
  10. Dekker, S., Lee, N.C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
  11. Ferrero, M., Garaizar, P., & Vadillo, M.A. (2016). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among Spanish teachers and an exploration of cross-cultural variation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 496. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00496
  12. Hair, J.F., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Black, W.C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice.
  13. Howard-Jones, P.A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817
  14. Jeyavel, S., Pandey, V., Rajkumar, E., & Lakshmana, G. (2022). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence among south Indian school teachers. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 781735. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.781735
  15. Krammer, G., Vogel, S.E., Yardimci, T., & Grabner, R.H. (2019). Neuromythen sind zu Beginn des Lehramtsstudiums prävalent und unabhängig vom wissen über das menschliche gehirn [Neuromyths are prevalent at the beginning of teacher education programs and independent of knowledge about the human brain]. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 9, 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-019-00238-2
  16. Krammer, G., Vogel, S.E., & Grabner, R.H. (2020). Believing in neuromyths makes neither a bad nor good student-teacher: The relationship between neuromyths and academic achievement in teacher education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 54 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12266
  17. Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L.M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314
  18. McMahon, K., Yeh, C.S.H., & Etchells, P.J. (2019). The impact of a modified initial teacher education on challenging trainees' understanding of neuromyths. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12219
  19. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  20. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2002). Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. OECD.
  21. Papadatou-Pastou, M., Gritzali, M., & Barrable, A. (2018). The learning styles Educational neuromyth: lack of agreement between teachers’ judgments, Self-Assessment, and students’ intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 105. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00105
  22. Ruhaak, A.E., & Cook, B.G. (2018). The prevalence of educational neuromyths among pre‐service special education teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 12(3), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12181
  23. Ruiz-Martin, H., Portero-Tresserra, M., Martínez-Molina, A., & Ferrero, M. (2022). Tenacious educational neuromyths: Prevalence among teachers and an intervention. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 29, Article 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2022.100192
  24. Sazaka, L.S.R., Hermida, M.J., & Ekuni, R. (2024). Where did pre-service teachers, teachers, and the general public learn neuromyths? Insights to support teacher training. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 36, Article 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2024.100235
  25. Schmitt, A., Wollschläger, R., Blanchette Sarrasin, J., Masson, S., Fischbach, A., & Schiltz, C. (2023). Neuromyths and knowledge about intellectual giftedness in a highly educated multilingual country. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1252239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252239
  26. Simoes, E., Foz, A., Petinati, F., Marques, A., Sato, J., Lepski, G., & Arévalo, A. (2022). Neuroscience knowledge and endorsement of neuromyths among educators: What is the scenario in Brazil? Brain Sciences, 12(6), Article 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060734
  27. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  28. Tardif, E., Doudin, P.A., & Meylan, N. (2015). Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers. Mind, brain, and Education, 9(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12070
  29. Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2018). Neuromyths: Debunking false ideas about the brain. WW Norton & Company
  30. Tovazzi, A., Giovannini, S., & Basso, D. (2020). A new method for evaluating knowledge, beliefs, and neuromyths about the mind and brain among Italian teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12249
  31. van Elk, M. (2019). Socio-cognitive biases are associated to belief in neuromyths and cognitive enhancement: A pre-registered study. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.014
  32. van Dijk, W., & Lane, H.B. (2020). The brain and the US education system: Perpetuation of neuromyths. Exceptionality, 28(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2018.1480954
  33. Vig, J., Révész, L., Kaj, M., Kälbli, K., Svraka, B., Révész-Kiszela, K., & Csányi, T. (2023). The prevalence of educational neuromyths among Hungarian pre-service teachers. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020031
  34. Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Dang, B., & Zhou, A. (2019, February). Neuromyths in Chinese classrooms: Evidence from headmasters in an underdeveloped region of China. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00008