SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4

The development of the Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Intention Scale

Merve Eker Çelebi(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8805-6214
Fatma Taşkın Ekici(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7798-6021
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CFA findings indicated that the developed model showed an acceptable level of model-data fit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool entitled the Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Intention Scale (SuCBIS) that provides valid and reliable data for identifying individuals’ sustainable consumption behaviors and their intentions within the framework of zero waste regulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The EFA was conducted with 242 pre-service teachers, while the CFA was carried out with a different sample of 280 pre-service teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CFA findings indicated that the developed model showed an acceptable level of model-data fit.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainable consumption behavior · Sustainable intention · Zero waste

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool entitled the Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Intention Scale (SuCBIS) that provides valid and reliable data for identifying individuals’ sustainable consumption behaviors and their intentions within the framework of zero waste regulation. The scale was constructed based on the steps of the zero-waste hierarchy: reconsider, reuse, recycle, and rot (compost). The research was designed within the scope of a descriptive survey model based on scale development. For the validation and reliability processes of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed. Convenience sampling was used in the study. The EFA was conducted with 242 pre-service teachers, while the CFA was carried out with a different sample of 280 pre-service teachers. The participants were undergraduate students enrolled in various teacher education programs. Content validity was ensured through literature review, the opinions of pre-service teachers, and expert evaluations. As a result of EFA, a five-factor structure was revealed regarding consumption behavior: reconsider, reuse, reduce, recycle, and compost. CFA findings indicated that the developed model showed an acceptable level of model-data fit. The reliability of the data obtained from the scale was supported by internal consistency analyses and item-total correlations. In conclusion, a measurement tool that provides valid and reliable data for evaluating pre-service teachers’ sustainable consumption behaviors and intentions has been developed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelebi, M. E., Ekici, F. T. (2025). The development of the Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Intention Scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Volume: 12 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1479112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (59)

  1. Afacan, Ö., & Demirci-Güler, M.P. (2012). Development of attitude scale in the context of sustainable environmental education. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(4), 2479-2488.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Aksan, Z., & Çelikler, D. (2017). The development of a recycling awareness scale for prospective science teachers. Educational Studies, 43(5), 567 583. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1312289
  4. Atabek-Yiğit, E., Yavuz-Topaloğlu, M., & Balkan-Kıyıcı, F. (2020). Recycling Scale for secondary school students: Scale development and reliability. PESA International Journal of Social Studies, 6(3), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.25272/j.2149-8385.2020.6.3.04
  5. Bektaş, Ş. (2020, March 2). Sıfır atık [Zero-waste] [PowerPoint slides]. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevre Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü [Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate of Environmental Management]. https://pagev.org/upload/files/1%20%C5%9EULE%20BEKTA%C5%9E.pptx
  6. Buğday, E.B. (2015). Bilinçli tüketici ölçeği geliştirme çalışması [Development of the Conscious Consumer Scale] [Doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
  7. Bulut, E., & Çavuldur, L. (2017). The impact of recycled paper pulp usage as a creative material in the visual arts education in developing an awareness and habit for paper recycling among the students. Internatıonal Journal of Afro Eurasıan Research, 2(4), 187 208. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/385029
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications, and interpretation (1st Edition)]. Pegem Publishing.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002b). Factor analysis: basic concepts and its use in scale development. Educational Administration in Theory & Practice, 32, 470-483.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. (16th Edition). Pegem Academy.
  11. Cabrera-Nguyen, E.P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2010.8
  12. Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological Significance of Nature (pp. 45-65). MIT Press.
  13. Coskun, T., & Marangoz, M. (2019). Development of the hedonic and utilitarian consumption behavior scale: reliability and validity study. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(2), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.183
  14. DeVellis, R.F. (2014). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
  15. Doğan, O., Bulut, Z.A., & Kökalan-Çımrın, F. (2015). A scale development study to measure individuals’ sustainable consumption behavior. Trends in Business and Economics, 29(4), 659-678.
  16. Duncan, E. (2011). Report Part 2 – ESD in practice. OMEP (Organisation Mondiale Pour L’Éducation Préscolaire).
  17. Dunn, T.J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
  18. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E.S., & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi [Data analysis with SPSS in the social sciences] (5th ed.). Beta Yayıncılık.
  19. Erbaşı, A. (2019). Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış Ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Green Organizational Behavior Scale: A scale development study]. Istanbul Management Journal, 86, 1-23. http://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0001
  20. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  21. Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
  22. Gökçe, N., Çetinkaya-Aydoğdu, C., Arslan, E., Bayram, F.Ö., & Akbaş, A. (2024). Ortaokul öğrencilerine yönelik yeniden kazanım tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. [Development of a recycling attitude scale for middle school students]. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 784-816.
  23. Güzeller, C.O. (2016). Herkes için çok değişkenli istatistik (1. Baskı) [Multivariate statistics for everyone (1st ed.)]. Maya Akademi.
  24. Harman, G., & Yenikalaycı, N. (2020). Awareness of preservice science teachers on zero waste approach. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 50, 138 161. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.589781
  25. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104 121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
  26. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
  27. Johnson, B. (2019). Sıfır atık ev [Zero waste home] (Ö. Kocaefe, Trans.). Sinek Sekiz Yayınları. (Original work published 2013)
  28. Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.). (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (6. baskı) [Multivariate statistical techniques with SPSS applications (6th ed.)]. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  29. Karatekin, K. (2013). Developing a scale to measure pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards solid waste and recycling: a validity and reliability study. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 4 (10), 71-90.
  30. Karadağ-Alçı Ş., Geçkil T., & Aksu S. (2023). Turkish adaptation of the environmentally sensitive product consumption behavior scale: A validity and reliability study. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(2), 540 553. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1224548
  31. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method] (26th ed.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
  32. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  33. Köse, E.Ö., & Gül, Ş. (2014). Öğretmen adayları için çevre sorumluluğuna bağlı tüketim bilinci ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of consumption consciousness depending on environmental responsibility scale for prospective teachers]. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 13, 257-277.
  34. Li, C.H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
  35. Liu, X., Wang, C., Shishime, T., & Fujitsuka, T. (2012). Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.484
  36. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  37. Munro, B.H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  38. Mutlu, M. (2013). “Recycling” concepts perceptions of grade eight students: phenomenographic analysis. Anthropologist 16(3), 663-669.
  39. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  40. Ocak, G., Olur, B., & Aydın, T.Y. (2022). Recycling awareness scale: A scale development study. African Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 107 116. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.102.22.009
  41. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  42. Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (R package). https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.psych
  43. Rosseel, Y. (2023). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  44. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  45. Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [The process of developing and adapting psychological tests: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Anı Yayıncılık.
  46. Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme [Developing measurement tools in psychology and education]. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  47. Song, Q., Li, J., & Zeng, X. (2015) Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 199 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.027
  48. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
  49. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik [Reliability and validity in social and behavioral measurements]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  50. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  51. Tekkaya, C., Kılıç, D.S., & Şahin, E. (2011, April 27–29). Geridönüşüm davranışının planlanmış davranış teorisi ile açıklanması: Sürdürülebilir bir kampüs için geri dönüşüm anketi [Explaining recycling behavior with the theory of planned behavior: Recycling survey for a sustainable campus] [Paper presentation]. 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (ICONTE), Antalya, Türkiye.
  52. TEMA [Turkish Foundation for Combating Erosion, Afforestation and Protection of Natural Assets]. (2018, December 26). Sıfır Atık on binlerce çocuğa ulaştırılacak [Zero waste will be delivered to tens of thousands of children] [Press release]. https://www.tema.org.tr/basin-odasi/basin-bultenleri/sifir-atik-on-binlerce-cocuga-ulastirilacak
  53. TEMA. (2019). Doğanın sürdürülebilirliği için 5D [5D for the sustainability of nature]. Turkish Foundation for Combating Erosion, Afforestation and Protection of Natural Assets. https://sifiratiktema.org/?/ortaokul
  54. Terzi, H., Baydar, V., Tosun, E.K., Sayın, M.E., & Ok, Ş. (2023). Sosyal sorumlu tüketim davranışı ölçeğinin kısaltılmış Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması [The Turkish Short Version of The Socially Responsible Consumption Behavior Scale (SRCBS): A Scale Adaptation]. Studies on Social Science, 3(2), 83 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.53035/SOSSCI.67
  55. The jamovi project (2023). Jamovi (Version 2.4) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
  56. Ural-Keleş, P., & Keleş, M.İ. (2018). İlkokul 3. ve 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin geri dönüşüm kavramı ile ilgili algıları [Perceptions of the 3rd and 4th Grade Students of Elementary School about The Concept of “Recycling"]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 481 498. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.404816
  57. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (7th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  58. Zaman, A. (2015). A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: Lessons learned and guidelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 12 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.013
  59. Zero Waste Regulation. (2019, July 12). Resmi Gazete, (30829). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=32659&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5