Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

iPAD LEARNING ECOSYSTEM: Developing Challenge-Based Learning using Design Thinking

Catalina MARIN, MEd Faculty, Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT) Abu Dhabi Women's College (ADWC) Abu Dhabi, UAE

Pages
22–34
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further development is needed in the areas of CBL assessment rubric development in English Language Teaching (ELT) and the analysis of student generated content through iPad applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to maximize college English language students' learning, product development, 21st Century skills and engagement with real world meaningful challenges, a course was designed to integrate Challenge Based Learning (CBL) and iPad mobile learning technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article describes the course design, which was grounded in design thinking, and provides an overview of the pilot implementation of the course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further development is needed in the areas of CBL assessment rubric development in English Language Teaching (ELT) and the analysis of student generated content through iPad applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mobile Learning · English Language Learning · Challenge Based Learning

Abstract

In order to maximize college English language students' learning, product development, 21st Century skills and engagement with real world meaningful challenges, a course was designed to integrate Challenge Based Learning (CBL) and iPad mobile learning technology. This article describes the course design, which was grounded in design thinking, and provides an overview of the pilot implementation of the course. The course achieved its goals to a great extent in that learners felt that they were beginning to help build a better college community by sharing stories of their learning experience and their insights about the essential question they chose with other students and with other teachers. The course also helped the students discover the use of English as they found ways to reach out to the broader college community and held meaningful conversations with teachers, librarians, managers, and staff from different departments and other students. The course transformed the teacher/researcher into an observer of learning and a guide, thus flipping the classroom and allowing the learners to take responsibility and steer their own learning experiences. Further development is needed in the areas of CBL assessment rubric development in English Language Teaching (ELT) and the analysis of student generated content through iPad applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARIN, C., HARGIS, J., CAVANAUGH, C. (2013). iPAD LEARNING ECOSYSTEM: Developing Challenge-Based Learning using Design Thinking. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 22–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/141064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acaoglu, M., Kerelvik, K., & Capsperson, G. (2011). TPACK in online lesson plans. Retrieved April 1, 2011, from http://prezi.com/ddcb8-urq8qi/site-11-tpack
  2. Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2010). Auditing the TPACK confidence of Australian pre-service teachers: The TPACK confidence survey (TCS). In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3772–3779). AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/33969
  3. Apple Inc. (2010). Challenge Based Learning: A Classroom Guide. Cupertino, CA: Author. “Bit by bit putting it all together” How a holistic view of assessment changed our perception of the TPACK framework. (2008). (c), 3932–3939.
  4. Bos, B. (2011). Professional development for elementary teachers using TPACK. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 167–183. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol11/iss2/mathematics/article1.cfm
  5. Brown, B. T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter (Winter 2010), 30–35. doi:10.1108/10878571011042050
  6. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. (M. Amelang, Ed.) Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92, 141. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605031
  7. Burdick, A., &, Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546–556. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142694X11000597
  8. Burgoyne, N., &, Graham, C. R. (2010). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of an Instrument Measuring TPACK, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 3787–3794.
  9. Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., & Kamali, T. (2013, March). Mobile learning in college: Early findings from a large-scale iPad program. BCS International IT Conference. Abu Dhabi, UAE. Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., Munns, S., & Kamali, T. (2013). iCelebrate teaching and learning: Sharing the iPad experience, Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology 1(2), 1-12.
  10. Colloquium, E., & Economics, B. (2009). Exploring Design Thinking as pragmatist inquiry. 25th EGOS Colloquium (Vol. 4, pp. 1–23). John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle: Design+Thinking+as+Knowledge+Work:+Epistemological+Foundations+and+Practic al+Implications#0 Ericson, A., Bergstrom, M., Larsson, A. C., & Torlind, P. (2009).
  11. Design Thinking Liedtka, J. (2011).