Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Communication Barriers: A Study of Eastern Mediterranean University Students’ and Teachers’ of Online Program and Courses

Associate Prof. Dr. Aytekin ISMAN

Pages
138–160
Publication Date
2005-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore; multiple qualitative and quantitative research approaches under mixed approach are used to be aware of communication barriers in online context and make participants to revamp the system by eliminating the weaknesses of the existing system and adapting to new trends that teachers and students have experienced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research study defines communication barriers in online program and courses by determining the perceptions of students and teachers at Eastern Mediterranean University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aims to get the answers of question which is what sorts of problems students and teachers face while being involved in online courses and online program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore; multiple qualitative and quantitative research approaches under mixed approach are used to be aware of communication barriers in online context and make participants to revamp the system by eliminating the weaknesses of the existing system and adapting to new trends that teachers and students have experienced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Communication Barriers · Eastern Mediterranean University · Online Program Online Courses

Abstract

This research study defines communication barriers in online program and courses by determining the perceptions of students and teachers at Eastern Mediterranean University. It aims to get the answers of question which is what sorts of problems students and teachers face while being involved in online courses and online program. Distance Education, in other words, online programs and online courses is the new challenge that universities face in the knowledge age in order to adapt to contemporary changes. Therefore; most of the universities try to improve their educational systems in relation to the demands of students by presenting alternatives depending on participants’ interests and needs. Eastern Mediterranean University has started to implement distance education program and online courses to meet the demands of its students with the support of developing technologies and trends. Communication is an essential concept in online context to define the effectiveness and quality of these systems in regards of having qualified communication among participants that provides mutual understanding in educational context for efficient outcomes. For having effective online system, defining the communication barriers is an important process. Therefore; multiple qualitative and quantitative research approaches under mixed approach are used to be aware of communication barriers in online context and make participants to revamp the system by eliminating the weaknesses of the existing system and adapting to new trends that teachers and students have experienced.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISMAN, A., ALTINAY, F. (2005). Communication Barriers: A Study of Eastern Mediterranean University Students’ and Teachers’ of Online Program and Courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 138–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/141033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal, 32(1), 33-42.
  2. Albrechtsen, K., Mariger, H., & Parker, C. (2001). Distance education and the impact of technology in Europe. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, (3), 107-15.
  3. Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learner in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 97-112). Madison: Atwood Publishing. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43.
  4. Applefield, J. M., Huber, R., Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in theory and practice: toward a better understanding. The Journal of High School, 84(2), 35-53.
  5. Armstrong, D., & Namsoo, A. C. (2000). New markets or new alliances? Distance education, globalization and postcolonial challenges. Retrieved March, 8, 2004, from www.co.org/resources/publications/SmallStates00/2_conf_proc_Armstrong. pdf. Asirvatham, S. (2000). Beyond the distance barrier. Journal of Property Management, (5), 42-48.
  6. Barbera, E. (2004). Quality in virtual education environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 13- Barrett, S. (2002). Overcoming transactional distance as a barrier to effective communication over the internet. International Education Journal, 3(4), 34-42.
  7. Bauman, P. (2002). Solving personnel problems in cyberspace. Distance EducationReport, (4), 1-15.
  8. Berge, Z. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(2). Retrieved October, 10, 2003, from http://westga.edu/~distance/Berge12.html
  9. Berge, Z. (2001). Obstacles faced at various stages of capability regarding distance education in institutions of higher education. Tech Trends, 45(4), 40-45.
  10. Berge, Z. (2002). Obstacles to distance training and education in corporate organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(5), 182-189.
  11. Berge, Z. (2003). Barriers to e-learning. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Irish Educational Technology Users Conference, Waterford, Ireland. Retrieved March, 8, 2004, from http://www.ilta.net/EdTech2003/papers/berge_handouts.doc.
  12. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, K. S. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston: A Division of S