Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Turkish Mentors' Perception of Roles, Competencies and Resources for Online Teaching

Pages
58–80
Publication Date
2005-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the study has supported Le Boterf’s claim about importance of context on identification of roles and competencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Developments in computer-mediated communications are not only providing new opportunities for educators but also changing roles and competencies in learning and teaching environments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experts agree that teaching online requires different roles and competencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the study has supported Le Boterf’s claim about importance of context on identification of roles and competencies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Online Teaching · Roles · Competencies

Abstract

Developments in computer-mediated communications are not only providing new opportunities for educators but also changing roles and competencies in learning and teaching environments. Experts agree that teaching online requires different roles and competencies. The literature includes several studies on roles and competencies for online teaching. However, as Le Boterf underlines, roles and competencies largely depend on context. This survey study intends to identify roles, competencies and resources for online teaching in Turkey by asking online mentors of Anadolu University what they think about the roles they should perform and the competencies and resources they should possess in order to teach online successfully. Results have shown that the participant Turkish online mentors agree on the significance of the assessor, the content expert and process facilitator roles; on the other hand, they indicate lower level of necessity for the material producer and the administrator roles. Results have also revealed lack of design competencies among online mentors. Overall, the study has supported Le Boterf’s claim about importance of context on identification of roles and competencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, C. H. (2005). Turkish Mentors' Perception of Roles, Competencies and Resources for Online Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 58–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/140909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alkan, C., et al (1997). Açıköğretim Lisesi uygulamasının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the Open Lycee] Ankara:
  2. MEB. Anderson, T. D., et al (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retreived March 12, 2004 from http://www.aln.org/publications/ jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp Angeli, C. et al (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31 Ataizi, M. & Caliskan, H. (2003). Evaluating online students: Online mentors’ perceptions. Unpublished raw data, Anadolu University of Eskisehir, Turkey. Aydin, C. H. (2001). Uses of the Internet in Turkey. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(4), 120-123.
  3. Aydin, C. H. & McIsaac, M.S. (2004). Impact of instructional technology in Turkey. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(1), 105-112.
  4. Aydin, C. H & Tasci, D. (in press). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging Country. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. Berge, Z.L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 15(1), 22-30.
  5. Collison, G. et al. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood. Cyrus, T. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 15-18.
  6. Daniel, J. (1996). Mega universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page. Demiray, U. (1993). Açıköğretim Fakültesi yetişkin-yaşlı mezunları [Adult graduates of the Open Education Faculty]. Eskisehir, Turkey: Anadolu University. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd Ed.) Applied Social Research Methods Series 26. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Goodyear, P., et al. (2001). Competences for online teaching. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(1), 65-72.
  7. Gunawardena, C.N. & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-25.
  8. Gunawardena, C. N. et al. (2001) A cross-cultural study of group process and development in online conferences Distance Education, 22(1), 85-121.
  9. Gunawardena, C. N. et al. (2003). Culture and online education. In Moore, M.G. & Anderson, W.G. (eds) Handbook of distance education (753-776).
  10. Mahwah, NJ: Lawren